From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/19] MdePkg/DebugLib.h: add ASSERT_RETURN_ERROR()
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:33:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8759211-eece-767c-8b4d-acb03fc4724c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0C09AFA07DD0434D9E2A0C6AEB0483103959121C@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 10/25/16 10:22, Zeng, Star wrote:
> In fact, EFI_* codes are a subset of RETURN_* codes, so it seems work to implement ASSERT_EFI_ERROR() using new ASSERT_RETURN_ERROR().
Let me commit the patch as-is for now, with Mike's review, and let's
continue the discussion on the above-suggested code sharing. If everyone
agrees, I can submit a separate patch that reuses ASSERT_RETURN_ERROR in
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR.
One thing I'm not so sure about (regarding the code sharing) is that
each of these macros prints its own name, as a literal string. If we
simply redefine ASSERT_EFI_ERROR with ASSERT_RETURN_ERROR, the error
message won't match the source code any longer for the former.
We can get around this by introducing a common base macro that also
takes the name to print as a parameter. But, I think that justifies a
separate patch even more.
Thanks!
Laszlo
> Thanks,
> Star
> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Kinney, Michael D
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 7:05 AM
> To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> Cc: edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH 01/19] MdePkg/DebugLib.h: add ASSERT_RETURN_ERROR()
>
> Hi Laszlo,
>
> Sorry for the delay. I was traveling last week.
>
> I did see this and I have been thinking about it.
> I think it does make sense to add this new macro for libraries of type BASE. I am surprised we did not run into an issue before that would have required the introduction of this macro earlier. Unless the workaround has been to add #include of <Uefi/UefiBaseTypes.h>, which makes me think we should review BASE libraries to make sure that extra include is not present.
>
> The EFI_* error codes are mapped to RETURN_* error codes. So the only feedback I was considering was to implement ASSERT_EFI_ERROR() using ASSERT_RETURN_ERROR(), but that might not always be the right mapping because the RETURN_* codes are a subset of EFI_* error codes.
>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mike
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 2:00 PM
>> To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Gao, Liming
>> <liming.gao@intel.com>
>> Cc: edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH 01/19] MdePkg/DebugLib.h: add
>> ASSERT_RETURN_ERROR()
>>
>> Mike, Liming,
>>
>> On 10/21/16 23:27, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR() cannot be used in BASE type modules because
>>> - the replacement text calls EFI_ERROR(),
>>> - EFI_ERROR() is defined in "MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiBaseType.h",
>>> - the inclusion of "UefiBaseType.h" is not required for BASE type modules.
>>>
>>> While
>>>
>>> ASSERT (!RETURN_ERROR (StatusParameter))
>>>
>>> would be a functional statement in BASE type modules, it would be
>>> less convenient and less informative: ASSERT_EFI_ERROR() prints the
>>> actual StatusParameter.
>>>
>>> Hence add ASSERT_RETURN_ERROR(), paralleling ASSERT_EFI_ERROR().
>>> Copy the original macro definition and update it as follows:
>>> - replace EFI with RETURN,
>>> - wrap overlong lines in the comment block and in the code,
>>> - EFI_D_ERROR is deprecated, so employ DEBUG_ERROR instead.
>>>
>>> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>>> Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166
>>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
>>> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Notes:
>>> OvmfPkg/SmbiosVersionLib, modified in one of the upcoming patches, is
>>> one such BASE module.
>>>
>>> MdePkg/Include/Library/DebugLib.h | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/Library/DebugLib.h
>>> b/MdePkg/Include/Library/DebugLib.h
>>> index 81904325703f..3a910e6a208b 100644
>>> --- a/MdePkg/Include/Library/DebugLib.h
>>> +++ b/MdePkg/Include/Library/DebugLib.h
>>> @@ -348,6 +348,33 @@ DebugPrintLevelEnabled (
>>> #define ASSERT_EFI_ERROR(StatusParameter) #endif
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + Macro that calls DebugAssert() if a RETURN_STATUS evaluates to an error code.
>>> +
>>> + If MDEPKG_NDEBUG is not defined and the
>>> + DEBUG_PROPERTY_DEBUG_ASSERT_ENABLED
>>> + bit of PcdDebugProperyMask is set, then this macro evaluates the
>>> + RETURN_STATUS value specified by StatusParameter. If
>>> + StatusParameter is an error code, then DebugAssert() is called
>>> + passing in the source filename, source line number, and StatusParameter.
>>> +
>>> + @param StatusParameter RETURN_STATUS value to evaluate.
>>> +
>>> +**/
>>> +#if !defined(MDEPKG_NDEBUG)
>>> + #define ASSERT_RETURN_ERROR(StatusParameter) \
>>> + do { \
>>> + if (DebugAssertEnabled ()) { \
>>> + if (RETURN_ERROR (StatusParameter)) { \
>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "\nASSERT_RETURN_ERROR (Status = %r)\n", \
>>> + StatusParameter)); \
>>> + _ASSERT (!RETURN_ERROR (StatusParameter)); \
>>> + } \
>>> + } \
>>> + } while (FALSE)
>>> +#else
>>> + #define ASSERT_RETURN_ERROR(StatusParameter)
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> Macro that calls DebugAssert() if a protocol is already installed in the
>>> handle database.
>>>
>>
>> can I please get a maintainer review for this patch? The rest of the
>> series is ready to go, but it depends on this patch.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Laszlo
>
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-25 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-21 21:27 [PATCH 00/19] OvmfPkg, ArmVirtPkg: leave deprecated interfaces behind Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 01/19] MdePkg/DebugLib.h: add ASSERT_RETURN_ERROR() Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-24 20:59 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-24 23:05 ` Kinney, Michael D
2016-10-25 7:54 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-25 10:32 ` Gao, Liming
2016-10-27 2:53 ` Kinney, Michael D
2016-10-25 8:22 ` Zeng, Star
2016-10-25 8:33 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 02/19] OvmfPkg/XenBusDxe: eliminate AsciiStrCpy() calls Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-24 4:44 ` Gary Lin
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 03/19] OvmfPkg/XenBusDxe: eliminate AsciiStrCat() calls Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-24 4:44 ` Gary Lin
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 04/19] OvmfPkg/EmuVariableFvbRuntimeDxe: eliminate unchecked PcdSetXX() calls Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-24 4:45 ` Gary Lin
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 05/19] OvmfPkg/PlatformBootManagerLib: " Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-24 4:45 ` Gary Lin
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 06/19] OvmfPkg/SmbiosVersionLib: " Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-24 8:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 07/19] OvmfPkg/PlatformDxe: " Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 08/19] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: " Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-24 4:45 ` Gary Lin
2016-10-24 11:51 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 09/19] OvmfPkg/QemuFlashFvbServicesRuntimeDxe: " Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 10/19] OvmfPkg: disable deprecated interfaces Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 11/19] ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtGicArchLib: eliminate unchecked PcdSetXX() calls Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-24 8:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 12/19] ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtPL031FdtClientLib: " Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-24 8:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 13/19] ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtPlatformLib: " Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-24 7:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 14/19] ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtTimerFdtClientLib: " Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-24 7:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 15/19] ArmVirtPkg/FdtPciPcdProducerLib: " Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-24 7:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 16/19] ArmVirtPkg/PlatformBootManagerLib: " Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-24 7:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 17/19] ArmPkg/ArmDisassemblerLib: replace AsciiStrCat() with AsciiStrCatS() Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-24 7:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-24 18:47 ` Jordan Justen
2016-10-24 19:54 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 18/19] ArmPkg/DefaultExceptionHandlerLib: " Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-24 7:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-24 11:52 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-21 21:27 ` [PATCH 19/19] ArmVirtPkg: disable deprecated interfaces Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-25 8:25 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-25 8:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-24 8:04 ` [PATCH 00/19] OvmfPkg, ArmVirtPkg: leave deprecated interfaces behind Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-24 11:50 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-25 8:26 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-25 8:45 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-25 8:49 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-24 18:48 ` Jordan Justen
2016-10-25 9:07 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a8759211-eece-767c-8b4d-acb03fc4724c@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox