From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
Ryan Harkin <ryan.harkin@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ArmPlatformPkg: eliminate Juno gcc build warning
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:44:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a978c8e3-460d-12d4-a74f-2d44089ca562@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170620120046.GZ26676@bivouac.eciton.net>
On 06/20/17 14:00, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 01:28:38PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> (+ Laszlo)
>>
>> On 20 June 2017 at 13:00, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> When building without LTO, gcc incorrectly resolves the hazards for
>>> 'PciRegBase’ when inlining, leading to "may be used uninitialized"
>>> warnings (and hence build failure with -Werror).
>>> Eliminate this warning by explicitly initializing the variable to 0.
>>>
>>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
>>> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>
> Thanks!
>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> For those who have heard me mentioning this before but arguing against
>>> upstreaming this patch: I only just tweaked that this warning doesn't
>>> go away with more recent toolchains, but simply when switching to GCC5
>>> build profile, and hence LTO. Build failure still reproducible with
>>> gcc 6.3.1 and GCC49.
>>
>> /me annoyed
>
> +1
>
>> We keep hitting this with GCC, and I profoundly dislike having to add
>> redundant initialization sequences. Is there any other solution
>> possible, e.g., disable this warning for certain builds?
>
> I would really like to not disable it.
> When it gets it right, that's usually a pretty horrific bug caught.
> And if we switch to LTO as the norm, I guess these will become less
> noticeable over time.
> But it does bug me too.
Perhaps we should introduce two macros to "MdePkg/Include/Base.h",
#define UNUSED_POINTER NULL
#define UNUSED_INTEGER 0
These could be used to suppress such warnings, without the risk of
misleading programmers (as to the real necessity of the variable
assignment at hand).
Thanks
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-20 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-20 11:00 [PATCH] ArmPlatformPkg: eliminate Juno gcc build warning Leif Lindholm
2017-06-20 11:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-20 11:44 ` Ryan Harkin
2017-06-20 12:04 ` Leif Lindholm
2017-06-20 12:00 ` Leif Lindholm
2017-06-20 15:44 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2017-06-20 19:52 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-20 19:57 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-06-20 20:05 ` Leif Lindholm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a978c8e3-460d-12d4-a74f-2d44089ca562@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox