public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	Ryan Harkin <ryan.harkin@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ArmPlatformPkg: eliminate Juno gcc build warning
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:44:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a978c8e3-460d-12d4-a74f-2d44089ca562@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170620120046.GZ26676@bivouac.eciton.net>

On 06/20/17 14:00, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 01:28:38PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> (+ Laszlo)
>>
>> On 20 June 2017 at 13:00, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> When building without LTO, gcc incorrectly resolves the hazards for
>>> 'PciRegBase’ when inlining, leading to "may be used uninitialized"
>>> warnings (and hence build failure with -Werror).
>>> Eliminate this warning by explicitly initializing the variable to 0.
>>>
>>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
>>> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
>>> ---
>>>
>>> For those who have heard me mentioning this before but arguing against
>>> upstreaming this patch: I only just tweaked that this warning doesn't
>>> go away with more recent toolchains, but simply when switching to GCC5
>>> build profile, and hence LTO. Build failure still reproducible with
>>> gcc 6.3.1 and GCC49.
>>
>> /me annoyed
> 
> +1
> 
>> We keep hitting this with GCC, and I profoundly dislike having to add
>> redundant initialization sequences. Is there any other solution
>> possible, e.g., disable this warning for certain builds?
> 
> I would really like to not disable it.
> When it gets it right, that's usually a pretty horrific bug caught.
> And if we switch to LTO as the norm, I guess these will become less
> noticeable over time.
> But it does bug me too.

Perhaps we should introduce two macros to "MdePkg/Include/Base.h",

#define UNUSED_POINTER NULL
#define UNUSED_INTEGER 0

These could be used to suppress such warnings, without the risk of
misleading programmers (as to the real necessity of the variable
assignment at hand).

Thanks
Laszlo


  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-20 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-20 11:00 [PATCH] ArmPlatformPkg: eliminate Juno gcc build warning Leif Lindholm
2017-06-20 11:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-20 11:44   ` Ryan Harkin
2017-06-20 12:04     ` Leif Lindholm
2017-06-20 12:00   ` Leif Lindholm
2017-06-20 15:44     ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2017-06-20 19:52       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-20 19:57         ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-06-20 20:05         ` Leif Lindholm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a978c8e3-460d-12d4-a74f-2d44089ca562@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox