From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=217.140.101.70; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=supreeth.venkatesh@arm.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E5F211A1E2C for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:12:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9160EBD; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:12:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from supven01-VirtualBox (unknown [10.119.48.40]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1EC0F3F575; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:12:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: From: Supreeth Venkatesh To: Laszlo Ersek , Leif Lindholm , Andrew Fish , Michael D Kinney Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" , "Jin, Eric" Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:12:32 -0600 In-Reply-To: <359acbc9-1e0f-722d-0096-67d77ab3c6c0@redhat.com> References: <20181212033214.10456-1-eric.jin@intel.com> <31cc8b433744850df7d65f73d3f2a6aa7840e71b.camel@arm.com> <20181214105917.qaplwp3vtspieig7@bivouac.eciton.net> <359acbc9-1e0f-722d-0096-67d77ab3c6c0@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Line endings: Was "Re: [edk2-test][Patch] uefi-sct/SctPkg:Correct macro name style in HwErrRecVariable Test" X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:12:38 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:12:38 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:12:38 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:12:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 14:24 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 12/14/18 11:59, Leif Lindholm wrote: > > Hmm, this gets me thinking... > > > > We were discussing before about doing a line ending conversion in > > edk2, and let the git gools provide native line endings (as > > designed). > > > > Is this a good opportunity to run a pilot with edk2-test, where > > much > > less history will be lost? > > Well, history won't be lost, in the sense that people running "git > blame" will need one more execution of "git blame" (to "look past" > the > whitespace change commit), but yes, it will result in a minor > inconvenience. > > And, I think, converting the edk2-test repo would not be a bad test > at all. > Thanks Leif/Laszlo. I volunteer to try the tool. However, I admit that I have not tried this before, any pointers/instructions on how to do this? > Thanks, > Laszlo