From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
devel@edk2.groups.io, ankur.a.arora@oracle.com
Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>,
Aaron Young <aaron.young@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v8 07/10] OvmfPkg/SmmCpuFeaturesLib: call CPU hot-eject handler
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 18:06:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adfdbe3f-42ae-0403-4c04-68785a8f1dd9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <746e09c5-8623-d1fe-5871-0960abf09579@redhat.com>
On 02/23/21 08:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 22/02/21 15:53, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> +
>>> + if (mCpuHotEjectData != NULL) {
>>> + CPU_HOT_EJECT_HANDLER Handler;
>>> +
>>> + Handler = mCpuHotEjectData->Handler;
>> This patch looks otherwise OK to me, but:
>>
>> In patch v8 08/10, we have a ReleaseMemoryFence(). (For now, it is only
>> expressed as a MemoryFence() call; we'll make that more precise later.)
>>
>> (1) I think that should be paired with an AcquireMemoryFence() call,
>> just before loading "mCpuHotEjectData->Handler" above -- for now, also
>> expressed as a MemoryFence() call only.
>
> In Linux terms, there is a control dependency here. However, it should
> at least be a separate statement to load mCpuHotEjectData (which from my
> EDK2 reminiscences should be a global) into a local variable. So
>
> EjectData = mCPUHotEjectData;
> // Optional AcquireMemoryFence here
> if (EjectData != NULL) {
> CPU_HOT_EJECT_HANDLER Handler;
>
> Handler = EjectData->Handler;
> if (Handler != NULL) {
> Handler (CpuIndex);
> }
> }
Yes, "mCPUHotEjectData" is a global.
"mCpuHotEjectData" itself is set up on the BSP (from the entry point
function of the PiSmmCpuSmmDxe driver), before any other APs have a
chance to execute any SMM-related code at all. Furthermore, once set up,
mCpuHotEjectData never changes -- it remains set to a particular
non-NULL value forever, or it remains NULL forever. (The latter case
applies when the possible CPU count is 1; IOW, then there is no AP at all.)
Because of that, I thought that the first comparison (mCpuHotEjectData
!= NULL) would not need any fence -- I thought it was similar to a
userspace program that (a) set a global variable in the "main" thread,
before calling pthread_create(), (b) treated the global variable as a
constant, ever after (meaning all threads).
However, mCpuHotEjectData->Handler is changed regularly (modified by the
BSP, and read "later" by all processors). That's why I thought the
acquire fence was needed in the following location:
if (mCpuHotEjectData != NULL) {
CPU_HOT_EJECT_HANDLER Handler;
//
// HERE -- AcquireMemoryFence()
//
Handler = mCpuHotEjectData->Handler;
if (Handler != NULL) {
Handler (CpuIndex);
}
}
Thanks!
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-23 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-22 7:19 [PATCH v8 00/10] support CPU hot-unplug Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: refactor hotplug logic Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 11:49 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: collect hot-unplug events Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 12:27 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 22:03 ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-23 16:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: add Qemu Cpu Status helper Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 12:31 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 22:22 ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: introduce UnplugCpus() Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 12:39 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 22:22 ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: define CPU_HOT_EJECT_DATA Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 13:06 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 22:33 ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] OvmfPkg/SmmCpuFeaturesLib: init CPU ejection state Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 14:19 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-23 7:37 ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] OvmfPkg/SmmCpuFeaturesLib: call CPU hot-eject handler Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 14:53 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-23 7:37 ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-23 16:52 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-23 7:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-23 17:06 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2021-02-23 17:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-23 20:46 ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: add EjectCpu() Ankur Arora
2021-02-23 20:36 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-23 20:51 ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: do actual CPU hot-eject Ankur Arora
2021-02-23 21:39 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-24 3:44 ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-25 19:22 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] OvmfPkg/SmmControl2Dxe: negotiate CPU hot-unplug Ankur Arora
2021-02-23 21:52 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adfdbe3f-42ae-0403-4c04-68785a8f1dd9@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox