From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com (out03.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.233]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.24577.1586984911273518995 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:08:31 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.233, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jOpGo-00032P-5O; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:08:30 -0600 Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.67]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jOpGn-0000KM-A4; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:08:30 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D736D161C68; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:08:28 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta3.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta3.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id UMMotadnd6lu; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:08:28 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) (Authenticated sender: rebecca@bsdio.com) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8C66161C62; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:08:28 -0600 (MDT) To: Sean , devel@edk2.groups.io References: <33e62be3-5cb2-67c7-1d8b-adf9d83bdeb4@bsdio.com> <5211.1586983478083118979@groups.io> From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:08:27 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5211.1586983478083118979@groups.io> X-XM-SPF: eid=1jOpGn-0000KM-A4;;;mid=;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.67;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.67 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa08.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01, T_TooManySym_02,TooManyTo_001,XMSubLong,XM_B_Unicode autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4817] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.0 XM_B_Unicode BODY: Testing for specific types of unicode * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa08 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_02 5+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa08 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Sean , devel@edk2.groups.io X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 650 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.07 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 14 (2.2%), b_tie_ro: 12 (1.9%), parse: 1.09 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 16 (2.5%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.02 (0.2%), tests_pri_-1000: 4.4 (0.7%), tests_pri_-950: 1.40 (0.2%), tests_pri_-900: 1.11 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 248 (38.2%), check_bayes: 242 (37.3%), b_tokenize: 4.9 (0.8%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (1.0%), b_comp_prob: 2.0 (0.3%), b_tok_touch_all: 223 (34.4%), b_finish: 1.50 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 277 (42.6%), check_dkim_signature: 0.48 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 175 (26.9%), poll_dns_idle: 235 (36.2%), tests_pri_10: 2.1 (0.3%), tests_pri_500: 82 (12.6%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 0/6] Edk2 Platform and Core CI for ArmVirtPkg, EmulatorPkg, and OvmfPkg X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US On 4/15/2020 2:44 PM, sean.brogan via [] wrote: > > Each CI framework has different syntax, capabilities, and > requirements.  The PyTools environment attempts to generalize the > edk2/uefi aspects of the setup, build, and test but regardless there > are things that should be done as "steps" in the CI framework being > targeted.  This is why there is a split between PlatformBuild.py and > the azurepipelines files.   PlatformBuild.py and the ReadMe.md files > all have details about how to run locally as well so those aspects can > be tested independently from the CI framework. I had difficulty running the PyTools locally, so I thought there was an idea to only support running it on Azure. Thanks for the clarification. -- Rebecca Cran