From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A01C721959CB2 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 03:20:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05C373097042; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-120-236.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.236]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F7E600C6; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:19:55 +0000 (UTC) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , yuchenlin@synology.com Cc: anthony.perard@citrix.com, jordan.l.justen@intel.com, edk2-devel@lists.01.org, phil@philjordan.eu References: <20181102032402.19686-1-yuchenlin@synology.com> <20181102032402.19686-6-yuchenlin@synology.com> <4d3da28e-42ca-c54e-1efa-c6fc8c9b0fb2@redhat.com> <3167b5fd-5514-5a79-e400-39d7c64e50ea@redhat.com> <6d5e3697-6da6-37bb-c47d-a971c6c360d0@redhat.com> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 12:19:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6d5e3697-6da6-37bb-c47d-a971c6c360d0@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.43]); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] OvmfPkg: simply use the Bochs interface for vmsvga X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:20:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Phil, On 11/06/18 14:44, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 6/11/18 14:36, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 11/06/18 12:47, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> >>> ... While we discuss this, I'll go ahead and push the first four >>> patches. The code being reverted is dead anyway. I'll report back about >>> the commit hashes. >> >> Before pushing the first four patches, I regression-tested them as well. >> Using: Cirrus, stdvga, and QXL. My QEMU version was >> v3.0.0-1763-gb2f7a038bb4c. The machine type was "pc-q35-3.0". >> >> For the first four patches: >> - Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek , >> - pushed them as commit range 62ea70e31285..328409ce8de7. > > Thanks Laszlo! > A bit late, but 1-4 reviewed too. can you please formally state your R-b, for the first four patches? For when I apply them again, after edk2-stable201811. Thanks! Laszlo