From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.12282.1596172633199958328 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 22:17:13 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=EZY9PbI0; spf=none, err=SPF record not found (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.231, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:References:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Gow6AabUjCIbHafCEmZkcp2fERq5OJv3S7TTr7wkhdc=; b=EZY9PbI0S2XAYbDPStRBhLrjUa UTNoq+jNtqtT2amhYeFlS6rUEnCDi3tCfFAz9zGRzOfnh8RAKNAC1T/8BHCr7ibY14Wq2mcv7BV4Z tnG9pNTWJ4PKWm3dWgqqe4yjLkoPUE3cU1+9zdAdWNr6uS24YW0fWRUEO7KsngBZZb9M=; Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1k1NPq-0054Sz-VG; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 23:17:11 -0600 Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.69]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1k1NPq-0006uE-6A; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 23:17:10 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B471280B4E; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 23:17:09 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta5.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta5.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 6Kt71pXcbQ8o; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 23:17:09 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 305A61280A4A; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 23:17:09 -0600 (MDT) From: "Rebecca Cran" To: Laszlo Ersek , devel@edk2.groups.io Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Andrew Fish , Leif Lindholm , Jordan L Justen , Michael D Kinney , Liming Gao References: <20200713054131.479627-1-rebecca@bsdio.com> <20200713054131.479627-2-rebecca@bsdio.com> <88d22f36-c210-f626-fe70-b2eb3c5fcd3c@redhat.com> <162169B0F92549B8.20689@groups.io> Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 23:17:08 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <162169B0F92549B8.20689@groups.io> X-XM-SPF: eid=1k1NPq-0006uE-6A;;;mid=;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.69;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=none X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa08.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,NICE_REPLY_A,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01, T_TooManySym_02,TooManyTo_001,XMNoVowels,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5001] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa08 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_02 5+ unique symbols in subject * -0.8 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-DCC: ; sa08 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;Laszlo Ersek , devel@edk2.groups.io X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 536 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 17 (3.1%), b_tie_ro: 14 (2.7%), parse: 1.33 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 13 (2.5%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.81 (0.2%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.8 (0.7%), tests_pri_-950: 1.36 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.12 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 56 (10.4%), check_bayes: 54 (10.1%), b_tokenize: 4.5 (0.8%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (1.1%), b_comp_prob: 1.77 (0.3%), b_tok_touch_all: 38 (7.0%), b_finish: 1.20 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 431 (80.3%), check_dkim_signature: 1.36 (0.3%), check_dkim_adsp: 46 (8.6%), poll_dns_idle: 42 (7.8%), tests_pri_10: 2.0 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 7 (1.3%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Add BhyvePkg, to support the bhyve hypervisor X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US On 7/13/20 2:25 PM, Rebecca Cran wrote: > On 7/13/20 12:09 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >> Can you please ping me when the PatchCheck.py problem has been solved, >> so I can go ahead with the merge? > > Will do. Hi Laszlo, I just rebased the bhyve commit against the latest edk2 master with no conflicts, and all CI checks passed (https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/841). So I think it's ready to go into the tree. -- Rebecca Cran