From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, ardb@kernel.org
Cc: "Taylor Beebe" <taylor.d.beebe@gmail.com>,
"Oliver Smith-Denny" <osd@smith-denny.com>,
"Peter Jones" <pjones@redhat.com>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@google.com>,
"L�szl� �rsek" <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Oliver Steffen" <osteffen@redhat.com>,
"Alexander Graf" <graf@amazon.com>,
"Leif Lindholm" <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] ArmVirtPkg: Allow EFI memory attributes protocol to be disabled
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 16:27:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ak2bhgjjmyh5fq7s3hnf3kohw6av4s3uhvxd2huolae7vbowku@cwjmv4ztpimg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXG3G+g2XXoWm=3ViwTT6KtEt--aMNFoAwHvaBQU1yXK=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
> But what we might do is invent a way to avoid setting the XP attribute
> on the entire region based on some heuristic. Given that the main
> purpose of the EFI memory attribute protocol is to provide the ability
> to remove XP (and set RO instead), perhaps we can avoid the set
> entirely? Just brainstorming here.
Can the fault handler deal with this? Set a flag somewhere, print a
big'n'fat error message, wait 5 secs, reset machine? After reset the
firmware will see the flag and come up in 'compat' instead of 'strict'
mode.
Not sure what a good place for such a flag would be. Do we have other
options than a non-volatile efi variable? When using a efi variable we
probably should add an 'expires' timestamp, so the machine doesn't stay
in 'compat' mode forever.
> (cc'ing Taylor and Oliver given that this is related to the memory
> policy work as well) Perhaps we can use the fact that the active image
> is non-NX compat to make some tweaks?
Memory policies would be another candidate which could possibly use a
less strict profile in 'compat' mode. I'd love to see memory policies
land for the February stable tag.
> What I really want to avoid is derail our effort to tighten things
> down and comply with the NX compat related policies, by adding some
> build time control that the distros will enable now and never disable
> again, citing backward compat concerns.
Sure, I want that too. Having an runtime switch is already an
improvement over having a compile time switch. Having this working
fully automatic would be even better of course.
> And the deafening silence from the shim developers is not an
> encouragement either.
Indeed.
take care,
Gerd
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#112129): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/112129
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/102967690/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-06 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-04 9:52 [edk2-devel] [PATCH] ArmVirtPkg: Allow EFI memory attributes protocol to be disabled Ard Biesheuvel
2023-12-04 9:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-12-04 10:45 ` Alexander Graf via groups.io
2023-12-04 10:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-12-04 12:20 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-12-04 12:38 ` Alexander Graf via groups.io
2023-12-04 12:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-12-05 9:56 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2023-12-07 8:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-12-04 14:52 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-12-04 16:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-12-04 22:24 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-12-05 10:44 ` Alexander Graf via groups.io
2023-12-05 12:56 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-12-04 10:53 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-12-04 10:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-12-04 11:40 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-12-06 12:51 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-12-06 13:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-12-06 15:27 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2023-12-06 20:00 ` Taylor Beebe
2023-12-06 18:37 ` Oliver Smith-Denny
2023-12-07 7:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ak2bhgjjmyh5fq7s3hnf3kohw6av4s3uhvxd2huolae7vbowku@cwjmv4ztpimg \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox