public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, shenglei.zhang@intel.com
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
	Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] SecurityPkg/Tpm2Help.c: Add boundary check for array
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 10:27:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b25fc5f2-793e-599d-c581-461e9b86f07a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191206014933.36648-1-shenglei.zhang@intel.com>

On 12/06/19 02:49, Zhang, Shenglei wrote:
> Add 'Index < HASH_COUNT' to ensure things out of boundary
> of digests[] can not be visited.
> 
> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  SecurityPkg/Library/Tpm2CommandLib/Tpm2Help.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/SecurityPkg/Library/Tpm2CommandLib/Tpm2Help.c b/SecurityPkg/Library/Tpm2CommandLib/Tpm2Help.c
> index 36c240d1221c..a7d4e3ab5373 100644
> --- a/SecurityPkg/Library/Tpm2CommandLib/Tpm2Help.c
> +++ b/SecurityPkg/Library/Tpm2CommandLib/Tpm2Help.c
> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ GetDigestListSize (
>    UINT32 TotalSize;
>  
>    TotalSize = sizeof(DigestList->count);
> -  for (Index = 0; Index < DigestList->count; Index++) {
> +  for (Index = 0; Index < DigestList->count, Index < HASH_COUNT; Index++) {
>      DigestSize = GetHashSizeFromAlgo (DigestList->digests[Index].hashAlg);
>      TotalSize += sizeof(DigestList->digests[Index].hashAlg) + DigestSize;
>    }
> 

Nacked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

The comma operator is either functionally wrong in this context, or
stylistically wrong. From the C standard:

    The left operand of a comma operator is evaluated as a void
    expression; there is a sequence point after its evaluation. Then the
    right operand is evaluated; the result has its type and value. [...]

In case we *only* need to check (Index < HASH_COUNT), then the patch is
stylistically incorrect: the (Index < DigestList->count) condition
should simply be removed.

In case we need to check *both* conditions, then the patch is
functionally wrong: we should either use the logical AND (&&) operator,
instead of the comma:

  Index < DigestList->count && Index < HASH_COUNT

or invoke the MIN() function-like macro:

  Index < MIN ((UINTN)DigestList->count, (UINTN)HASH_COUNT)

Thanks
Laszlo


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-06  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-06  1:49 [PATCH] SecurityPkg/Tpm2Help.c: Add boundary check for array Zhang, Shenglei
2019-12-06  2:04 ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-12-16  6:57   ` Zhang, Shenglei
2019-12-06  9:27 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-12-16  6:58   ` [edk2-devel] " Zhang, Shenglei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b25fc5f2-793e-599d-c581-461e9b86f07a@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox