From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.4248.1587489154162986636 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:12:34 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.231, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQwRk-0004Xw-P6; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:12:32 -0600 Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.67]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jQwRj-0006DD-5e; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:12:32 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE574160ED1; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:12:30 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta3.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta3.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id KfWqH2K4jbNx; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:12:30 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) (Authenticated sender: rebecca@bsdio.com) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 802451603F8; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:12:30 -0600 (MDT) To: Laszlo Ersek , devel@edk2.groups.io Cc: Jordan Justen , Ard Biesheuvel , "Leif Lindholm (Linaro address)" , Michael Kinney , Andrew Fish References: <66d11e29-504f-f41f-2a6d-e914d061277a@redhat.com> <883577ce-2118-99bf-1270-541496a852b3@redhat.com> From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:12:29 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <883577ce-2118-99bf-1270-541496a852b3@redhat.com> X-XM-SPF: eid=1jQwRj-0006DD-5e;;;mid=;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.67;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.67 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,TooManyTo_001, XMNoVowels,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4939] * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **;Laszlo Ersek , devel@edk2.groups.io X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 1375 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 10 (0.8%), b_tie_ro: 9 (0.7%), parse: 0.94 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 3.6 (0.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.39 (0.0%), tests_pri_-1000: 2.5 (0.2%), tests_pri_-950: 1.20 (0.1%), tests_pri_-900: 0.98 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 183 (13.3%), check_bayes: 182 (13.2%), b_tokenize: 4.6 (0.3%), b_tok_get_all: 99 (7.2%), b_comp_prob: 1.66 (0.1%), b_tok_touch_all: 74 (5.4%), b_finish: 0.85 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 1159 (84.3%), check_dkim_signature: 0.51 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 1041 (75.7%), poll_dns_idle: 1035 (75.3%), tests_pri_10: 2.2 (0.2%), tests_pri_500: 9 (0.6%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 00/13] BhyvePkg - initial patch series for review X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US On 4/20/20 3:57 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > It would be great if Peter could post formal R-b's or A-b's in response > to (some of) the patches on edk2-devel. > > Alternatively, you could mention Peter's review somewhere in the commit > messages, in natural language. > > Again, not a "hard requirement" from my side, I'd just really appreciate it. I've cc'd him on the latest v3 patch series, and asked him to give formal R-b's. -- Rebecca Cran