From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Alcantara, Paulo" <paulo.alc.cavalcanti@hp.com>,
Rafael Machado <rafaelrodrigues.machado@gmail.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>
Subject: Re: Question about OS initialization at UEFI firmware (x86)
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:18:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b36a9d7f-8f35-0931-0125-ccbc4d2caa9b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CS1PR84MB02304185AD724D0274DC9436AC600@CS1PR84MB0230.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On 01/05/17 13:16, Alcantara, Paulo wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
>> Rafael Machado
>> Sent: quinta-feira, 5 de janeiro de 2017 10:00
>> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> Subject: [edk2] Question about OS initialization at UEFI firmware (x86)
>>
>> Hi everyone
>>
>> I was taking a look at how the OS boots after the firmware and bootloader
>> are done.
>>
>> To understand this I started to take a look at the linux source code, and the
>> strange is that I saw some bios legacy interrupts being called.
>>
>> The flow I checked is this:
>>
>> void main(void) --> linux/arch/x86/boot/main.c
>> int detect_memory(void) --> linux/arch/x86/boot/memory.c
>> static int detect_memory_e820(void) -->
>> linux/arch/x86/boot/memory.c
>> intcall(0x15, &ireg, &oreg) --> linux/arch/x86/boot/memory.c
>>
>>
>> At the last call the value of ireg is this one:
>>
>> ireg.ax = 0xe820;
>> ireg.cx = sizeof buf;
>> ireg.edx = SMAP;
>> ireg.di = (size_t)&buf;
>>
>>
>> As we can see this is done so the OS knows the memory map, so the OS can
>> do all its magic.
>>
>> Finally, my question is:
>>
>> How could linux, or any other OS, boot on a system with UEFI firmware that
>> does not have CSM (compatibility support module) ?
>
> The code you pasted above seems to be executed when booting Linux on
> PC BIOS firmware. See below.
>
>> I consider that some parts of the hypothetical OS need to be written to call
>> some UEFI protocols. Am I right ?
>
> As far as I know, there are currently two ways of booting Linux on
> UEFI firmware:
>
> 1) The OS loader (bootloader as a PE/COFF image) uses the EFI handover
> protocol to boot the Linux kernel image. What the loader does is
> basically to find the entry point offset (handover_offset) in that
> image and jump to it. The entry point conforms to ABI defined in UEFI
> spec.
>
> 2) The kernel may be built as PE/COFF binary (UEFI image) so the firmware can
> directly boot it at BDS without any external OS loader.
>
> You might want to look at how OVMF boots up Linux through QEMU's command-line parameter "-kernel" by using EFI handover protocol.
See also:
https://lwn.net/Articles/632528/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-05 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-05 11:16 Question about OS initialization at UEFI firmware (x86) Rafael Machado
2017-01-05 11:59 ` Rafael Machado
2017-01-05 12:16 ` Alcantara, Paulo
2017-01-05 13:18 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2017-01-07 21:14 ` Rafael Machado
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b36a9d7f-8f35-0931-0125-ccbc4d2caa9b@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox