From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=66.187.233.73; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2188922436937 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 07:20:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54F7840201A0; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:26:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-120-112.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.112]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F43810AF9E6; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:26:38 +0000 (UTC) To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Heyi Guo , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" , Ruiyu Ni , Eric Dong , Michael D Kinney , Star Zeng References: <1519376008-110662-1-git-send-email-heyi.guo@linaro.org> <1519376008-110662-2-git-send-email-heyi.guo@linaro.org> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:26:38 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.6]); Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:26:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.6]); Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:26:40 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.3' DOMAIN:'int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'lersek@redhat.com' RCPT:'' Subject: Re: [RFC v3 1/3] MdeModulePkg/PciHostBridgeDxe: Add support for address translation X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:20:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/23/18 16:17, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 23 February 2018 at 15:05, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> (3) In general, the comment style requires comments like this: >> >> // >> // Add empty comment lines both before and after. >> // >> > > Quite the opposite, in fact. Search for 'horror vacui' in the coding > style document. Right, I remember that. But, I don't recall a single comment block (using "//"), recent or old, that does not violate that rule. Arguably, the rule is wrong (it certainly doesn't match on-going practice). Technically I was wrong however; thanks for the correction. > That does not mean I agree with that document, and I am perfectly fine > with both styles. OK. So, please ignore my comments on the comments. Thanks Laszlo