From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DEB921B02822 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 03:30:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94FE5C0BEAB4; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:30:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-120-237.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.237]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CB85D6A6; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:30:20 +0000 (UTC) To: David Woodhouse , "Ni, Ray" , Gerd Hoffmann , "Richardson, Brian" Cc: "Justen, Jordan L" , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" , Kevin O'Connor , Anthony Perard References: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BF6035C@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20181220064447.7eflwhm3t5upj7ds@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BF6895F@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BFCEBF2@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BFCF8F8@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <04736175-5976-8aff-ded1-e3bbbbaac679@redhat.com> <06825a8acc18a750c06675124373e40574e8e585.camel@infradead.org> <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BFD28AE@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <73ed780d136faa94f5e01b58762250e009b794f9.camel@infradead.org> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 12:30:19 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <73ed780d136faa94f5e01b58762250e009b794f9.camel@infradead.org> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:30:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Drop CSM support in OvmfPkg? X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:30:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/24/19 10:31, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2019-01-24 at 01:48 +0000, Ni, Ray wrote: >> David, >> I think we got an agreement here to move CSM components in OvmfPkg. >> I prefer we firstly clone the required CSM components in OvmfPkg right no. >> Finally I can remove the IntelFrameworkModulePkg/IntelFrameworkPkg in one patch. >> (I say "finally" because OVMF CSM dependency is not the only case that prevent removing >> the two framework packages.) >> >> Would you like to do the clone? Or if you are busy, I can do that. > > I keep asking this question, I don't believe I've seen an > answer. Apologies if I've missed it. I think you haven't. And, I'm curious too. :) Thanks Laszlo > Is this code genuinely not going to continue to exist anywhere else in > the Intel ecosystem, any more? > > No TianoCore-based images from this point forth are ever going to even > have the option of supporting CSM? > > Unless some third party also chooses to fork the CSM support code and > keep it on for themselves? >