public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: gaoliming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
	'Ard Biesheuvel' <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>,
	devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: 'Dandan Bi' <dandan.bi@intel.com>,
	'Jian J Wang' <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
	'Hao A Wu' <hao.a.wu@intel.com>,
	'Sami Mujawar' <sami.mujawar@arm.com>,
	'Leif Lindholm' <leif@nuviainc.com>
Subject: Re: 回复: 回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/3] MdeModulePkg/AcpiTableDxe: use pool allocations when possible
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 07:25:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b58d3b6b-40ff-1d0d-a15b-17acb898f0ba@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <003401d6ab38$411f31d0$c35d9570$@byosoft.com.cn>

On 10/26/20 02:35, gaoliming wrote:
> Ard:
>   I verify this patch on OvmfX64 and collect the memmap info. I don't see the difference in memmap. 
>   So, this enhancement is for AARCH64 only. Is it right?

That's my understanding, yes. OVMF enables ACPI 1.0b support in the
bitmask PCD, and so the compat code for 32-bit allocations (= page
allocations for expressing the 4GB limit) remains active.

Laszlo

>> -----邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
>> 发送时间: 2020年10月22日 20:56
>> 收件人: gaoliming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; 'Laszlo Ersek'
>> <lersek@redhat.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
>> 抄送: 'Dandan Bi' <dandan.bi@intel.com>; 'Jian J Wang'
>> <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; 'Hao A Wu' <hao.a.wu@intel.com>; 'Sami Mujawar'
>> <sami.mujawar@arm.com>; 'Leif Lindholm' <leif@nuviainc.com>
>> 主题: Re: 回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/3] MdeModulePkg/AcpiTableDxe: use
>> pool allocations when possible
>>
>> On 10/22/20 4:01 AM, gaoliming wrote:
>>> Ard:
>>>    Can you help to collect memmap information on Shell before this
>> change and after this change? I want to know what’s impact on the memory
>> layout.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Before:
>> ===================
>> Type       Start            End              # Pages
>> Available  0000000040000000-00000000403B2FFF 00000000000003B3
>> LoaderCode 00000000403B3000-000000004047FFFF 00000000000000CD
>> ACPI_Recl  0000000040480000-00000000404DFFFF 0000000000000060
>> Available  00000000404E0000-00000000404FFFFF 0000000000000020
>> ACPI_Recl  0000000040500000-000000004051FFFF 0000000000000020
>> RT_Code    0000000040520000-000000004059FFFF 0000000000000080
>> RT_Data    00000000405A0000-000000004068FFFF 00000000000000F0
>> RT_Code    0000000040690000-000000004074FFFF 00000000000000C0
>> Available  0000000040750000-000000004188FFFF 0000000000001140
>> BS_Data    0000000041890000-00000000418ADFFF 000000000000001E
>> Available  00000000418AE000-00000000418CBFFF 000000000000001E
>> BS_Data    00000000418CC000-000000004299AFFF 00000000000010CF
>> Available  000000004299B000-000000004299BFFF 0000000000000001
>> BS_Data    000000004299C000-0000000043643FFF 0000000000000CA8
>> Available  0000000043644000-000000004391AFFF 00000000000002D7
>> BS_Code    000000004391B000-0000000043C1FFFF 0000000000000305
>> RT_Code    0000000043C20000-0000000043DAFFFF 0000000000000190
>> RT_Data    0000000043DB0000-0000000043FFFFFF 0000000000000250
>> Available  0000000044000000-000000004401EFFF 000000000000001F
>> BS_Data    000000004401F000-000000004401FFFF 0000000000000001
>> Available  0000000044020000-00000000477F7FFF 00000000000037D8
>> BS_Data    00000000477F8000-0000000047819FFF 0000000000000022
>> BS_Code    000000004781A000-000000004784FFFF 0000000000000036
>> BS_Data    0000000047850000-0000000047EEBFFF 000000000000069C
>> BS_Code    0000000047EEC000-0000000047EEFFFF 0000000000000004
>> BS_Data    0000000047EF0000-0000000047FF0FFF 0000000000000101
>> BS_Code    0000000047FF1000-0000000047FFAFFF 000000000000000A
>> BS_Data    0000000047FFB000-0000000047FFFFFF 0000000000000005
>> MMIO       0000000004000000-0000000007FFFFFF 0000000000004000
>> MMIO       0000000009010000-0000000009010FFF 0000000000000001
>>
>>    Reserved  :              0 Pages (0 Bytes)
>>    LoaderCode:            205 Pages (839,680 Bytes)
>>    LoaderData:              0 Pages (0 Bytes)
>>    BS_Code   :            841 Pages (3,444,736 Bytes)
>>    BS_Data   :          9,561 Pages (39,161,856 Bytes)
>>    RT_Code   :            720 Pages (2,949,120 Bytes)
>>    RT_Data   :            832 Pages (3,407,872 Bytes)
>>    ACPI_Recl :            128 Pages (524,288 Bytes)
>>    ACPI_NVS  :              0 Pages (0 Bytes)
>>    MMIO      :         16,385 Pages (67,112,960 Bytes)
>>    MMIO_Port :              0 Pages (0 Bytes)
>>    PalCode   :              0 Pages (0 Bytes)
>>    Available :         20,481 Pages (83,890,176 Bytes)
>>    Persistent:              0 Pages (0 Bytes)
>>                --------------
>> Total Memory:            128 MB (134,217,728 Bytes)
>>
>>
>> After:
>> ===================
>> Type       Start            End              # Pages
>> Available  0000000040000000-0000000043EE1FFF 0000000000003EE2
>> LoaderCode 0000000043EE2000-0000000043FBFFFF 00000000000000DE
>> RT_Code    0000000043FC0000-0000000043FFFFFF 0000000000000040
>> BS_Data    0000000044000000-000000004401FFFF 0000000000000020
>> Available  0000000044020000-000000004402FFFF 0000000000000010
>> ACPI_Recl  0000000044030000-000000004403FFFF 0000000000000010
>> RT_Code    0000000044040000-000000004407FFFF 0000000000000040
>> RT_Data    0000000044080000-000000004413FFFF 00000000000000C0
>> RT_Code    0000000044140000-000000004418FFFF 0000000000000050
>> RT_Data    0000000044190000-000000004422FFFF 00000000000000A0
>> RT_Code    0000000044230000-000000004431FFFF 00000000000000F0
>> Available  0000000044320000-0000000045481FFF 0000000000001162
>> BS_Data    0000000045482000-000000004549FFFF 000000000000001E
>> Available  00000000454A0000-00000000454BDFFF 000000000000001E
>> BS_Data    00000000454BE000-00000000454CAFFF 000000000000000D
>> Available  00000000454CB000-00000000454CFFFF 0000000000000005
>> BS_Data    00000000454D0000-0000000047217FFF 0000000000001D48
>> Available  0000000047218000-00000000472AAFFF 0000000000000093
>> BS_Code    00000000472AB000-00000000475FFFFF 0000000000000355
>> RT_Code    0000000047600000-000000004768FFFF 0000000000000090
>> Available  0000000047690000-000000004769FFFF 0000000000000010
>> RT_Data    00000000476A0000-00000000477BFFFF 0000000000000120
>> Available  00000000477C0000-00000000477DEFFF 000000000000001F
>> BS_Data    00000000477DF000-0000000047801FFF 0000000000000023
>> BS_Code    0000000047802000-0000000047848FFF 0000000000000047
>> BS_Data    0000000047849000-0000000047EDCFFF 0000000000000694
>> BS_Code    0000000047EDD000-0000000047EE4FFF 0000000000000008
>> BS_Data    0000000047EE5000-0000000047FE5FFF 0000000000000101
>> BS_Code    0000000047FE6000-0000000047FFAFFF 0000000000000015
>> BS_Data    0000000047FFB000-0000000047FFFFFF 0000000000000005
>> MMIO       0000000004000000-0000000007FFFFFF 0000000000004000
>> MMIO       0000000009010000-0000000009010FFF 0000000000000001
>>
>>    Reserved  :              0 Pages (0 Bytes)
>>    LoaderCode:            222 Pages (909,312 Bytes)
>>    LoaderData:              0 Pages (0 Bytes)
>>    BS_Code   :            953 Pages (3,903,488 Bytes)
>>    BS_Data   :          9,552 Pages (39,124,992 Bytes)
>>    RT_Code   :            592 Pages (2,424,832 Bytes)
>>    RT_Data   :            640 Pages (2,621,440 Bytes)
>>    ACPI_Recl :             16 Pages (65,536 Bytes)
>>    ACPI_NVS  :              0 Pages (0 Bytes)
>>    MMIO      :         16,385 Pages (67,112,960 Bytes)
>>    MMIO_Port :              0 Pages (0 Bytes)
>>    PalCode   :              0 Pages (0 Bytes)
>>    Available :         20,793 Pages (85,168,128 Bytes)
>>    Persistent:              0 Pages (0 Bytes)
>>                --------------
>> Total Memory:            128 MB (134,217,728 Bytes)
>>
>>
>>> Liming
>>>> -----邮件原件-----
>>>> 发件人: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>>>> 发送时间: 2020年10月20日 3:48
>>>> 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io; ard.biesheuvel@arm.com
>>>> 抄送: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>; Liming Gao
>>>> <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Hao
>> A
>>>> Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>; Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>;
>> Leif
>>>> Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
>>>> 主题: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/3] MdeModulePkg/AcpiTableDxe: use
>> pool
>>>> allocations when possible
>>>>
>>>> On 10/16/20 17:49, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>>> On AArch64 systems, page based allocations for memory types that are
>>>>> relevant to the OS are rounded up to 64 KB multiples. This wastes
>>>>> some space in the ACPI table memory allocator, since it uses page
>>>>> based allocations in order to be able to place the ACPI tables low
>>>>> in memory.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since the latter requirement does not exist on AArch64, switch to pool
>>>>> allocations for all ACPI tables except the root tables if the active
>>>>> allocation policy permits them to be anywhere in memory. The root
>>>>> tables will be handled in a subsequent patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiTable.h         |
>> 4
>>>> +-
>>>>>   MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiSdt.c
>> |
>>>> 4 +-
>>>>>   MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiTableProtocol.c |
>> 75
>>>> ++++++++++++++------
>>>>>   3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiTable.h
>>>> b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiTable.h
>>>>> index 425a462fd92b..6e600e7acd24 100644
>>>>> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiTable.h
>>>>> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiTable.h
>>>>> @@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ typedef struct {
>>>>>     LIST_ENTRY              Link;
>>>>>     EFI_ACPI_TABLE_VERSION  Version;
>>>>>     EFI_ACPI_COMMON_HEADER  *Table;
>>>>> -  EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS    PageAddress;
>>>>> -  UINTN                   NumberOfPages;
>>>>> +  UINTN                   TableSize;
>>>>>     UINTN                   Handle;
>>>>> +  BOOLEAN                 PoolAllocation;
>>>>>   } EFI_ACPI_TABLE_LIST;
>>>>>
>>>>>   //
>>>>
>>>> (1) The preceding comment (which explains the fields) should be updated.
>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiSdt.c
>>>> b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiSdt.c
>>>>> index b1cba20c8ed7..14ced68e645f 100644
>>>>> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiSdt.c
>>>>> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiSdt.c
>>>>> @@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ FindTableByBuffer (
>>>>>
>>>>>     while (CurrentLink != StartLink) {
>>>>>       CurrentTableList = EFI_ACPI_TABLE_LIST_FROM_LINK
>> (CurrentLink);
>>>>> -    if (((UINTN)CurrentTableList->PageAddress <= (UINTN)Buffer) &&
>>>>> -        ((UINTN)CurrentTableList->PageAddress +
>>>> EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(CurrentTableList->NumberOfPages) > (UINTN)Buffer))
>> {
>>>>> +    if (((UINTN)CurrentTableList->Table <= (UINTN)Buffer) &&
>>>>> +        ((UINTN)CurrentTableList->Table +
>> CurrentTableList->TableSize >
>>>> (UINTN)Buffer)) {
>>>>>         //
>>>>>         // Good! Found Table.
>>>>>         //
>>>>> diff --git
>>>> a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiTableProtocol.c
>>>> b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiTableProtocol.c
>>>>> index ad7baf8205b4..b05e57e6584f 100644
>>>>> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiTableProtocol.c
>>>>> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe/AcpiTableProtocol.c
>>>>> @@ -428,6 +428,26 @@ ReallocateAcpiTableBuffer (
>>>>>     return EFI_SUCCESS;
>>>>>   }
>>>>>
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> +  Free the memory associated with provided the EFI_ACPI_TABLE_LIST
>>>> instance
>>>>
>>>> (2) s/with provided the/with the provided/
>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +  @param  TableEntry                EFI_ACPI_TABLE_LIST
>>>> instance pointer
>>>>> +
>>>>> +**/
>>>>> +STATIC
>>>>> +VOID
>>>>> +FreeTableMemory (
>>>>> +  EFI_ACPI_TABLE_LIST   *TableEntry
>>>>> +  )
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +  if (TableEntry->PoolAllocation) {
>>>>> +    gBS->FreePool (TableEntry->Table);
>>>>> +  } else {
>>>>> +    gBS->FreePages
>>>> ((EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)(UINTN)TableEntry->Table,
>>>>> +           EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES (TableEntry->TableSize));
>>>>> +  }
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>>   /**
>>>>>     This function adds an ACPI table to the table list.  It will detect
>> FACS
>>>> and
>>>>>     allocate the correct type of memory and properly align the table.
>>>>> @@ -454,14 +474,15 @@ AddTableToList (
>>>>>     OUT UINTN                               *Handle
>>>>>     )
>>>>>   {
>>>>> -  EFI_STATUS          Status;
>>>>> -  EFI_ACPI_TABLE_LIST *CurrentTableList;
>>>>> -  UINT32              CurrentTableSignature;
>>>>> -  UINT32              CurrentTableSize;
>>>>> -  UINT32              *CurrentRsdtEntry;
>>>>> -  VOID                *CurrentXsdtEntry;
>>>>> -  UINT64              Buffer64;
>>>>> -  BOOLEAN             AddToRsdt;
>>>>> +  EFI_STATUS            Status;
>>>>> +  EFI_ACPI_TABLE_LIST   *CurrentTableList;
>>>>> +  UINT32                CurrentTableSignature;
>>>>> +  UINT32                CurrentTableSize;
>>>>> +  UINT32                *CurrentRsdtEntry;
>>>>> +  VOID                  *CurrentXsdtEntry;
>>>>> +  EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS  AllocPhysAddress;
>>>>> +  UINT64                Buffer64;
>>>>> +  BOOLEAN               AddToRsdt;
>>>>>
>>>>>     //
>>>>>     // Check for invalid input parameters
>>>>> @@ -496,8 +517,8 @@ AddTableToList (
>>>>>     // There is no architectural reason these should be below 4GB, it is
>>>> purely
>>>>>     // for convenience of implementation that we force memory below
>>>> 4GB.
>>>>>     //
>>>>> -  CurrentTableList->PageAddress   = 0xFFFFFFFF;
>>>>> -  CurrentTableList->NumberOfPages = EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES
>>>> (CurrentTableSize);
>>>>> +  AllocPhysAddress              = 0xFFFFFFFF;
>>>>> +  CurrentTableList->TableSize   = CurrentTableSize;
>>>>>
>>>>>     //
>>>>>     // Allocation memory type depends on the type of the table
>>>>> @@ -518,9 +539,22 @@ AddTableToList (
>>>>>       Status = gBS->AllocatePages (
>>>>>                       AllocateMaxAddress,
>>>>>                       EfiACPIMemoryNVS,
>>>>> -                    CurrentTableList->NumberOfPages,
>>>>> -                    &CurrentTableList->PageAddress
>>>>> +                    EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES
>>>> (CurrentTableList->TableSize),
>>>>> +                    &AllocPhysAddress
>>>>>                       );
>>>>> +    CurrentTableList->Table = (EFI_ACPI_COMMON_HEADER
>>>> *)(UINTN)AllocPhysAddress;
>>>>> +  } else if (mAcpiTableAllocType == AllocateAnyPages) {
>>>>> +    //
>>>>> +    // If there is no allocation limit, there is also no need to use page
>>>>> +    // based allocations for ACPI tables, which may be wasteful on
>>>> platforms
>>>>> +    // such as AArch64 that allocate multiples of 64 KB
>>>>> +    //
>>>>> +    Status = gBS->AllocatePool (
>>>>> +                    EfiACPIReclaimMemory,
>>>>> +                    CurrentTableList->TableSize,
>>>>> +                    (VOID **)&CurrentTableList->Table
>>>>> +                    );
>>>>> +    CurrentTableList->PoolAllocation = TRUE;
>>>>>     } else {
>>>>>       //
>>>>>       // All other tables are ACPI reclaim memory, no alignment
>>>> requirements.
>>>>> @@ -528,9 +562,10 @@ AddTableToList (
>>>>>       Status = gBS->AllocatePages (
>>>>>                       mAcpiTableAllocType,
>>>>>                       EfiACPIReclaimMemory,
>>>>> -                    CurrentTableList->NumberOfPages,
>>>>> -                    &CurrentTableList->PageAddress
>>>>> +                    EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES
>>>> (CurrentTableList->TableSize),
>>>>> +                    &AllocPhysAddress
>>>>>                       );
>>>>> +    CurrentTableList->Table = (EFI_ACPI_COMMON_HEADER
>>>> *)(UINTN)AllocPhysAddress;
>>>>>     }
>>>>>     //
>>>>>     // Check return value from memory alloc.
>>>>> @@ -539,10 +574,6 @@ AddTableToList (
>>>>>       gBS->FreePool (CurrentTableList);
>>>>>       return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
>>>>>     }
>>>>> -  //
>>>>> -  // Update the table pointer with the allocated memory start
>>>>> -  //
>>>>> -  CurrentTableList->Table = (EFI_ACPI_COMMON_HEADER *) (UINTN)
>>>> CurrentTableList->PageAddress;
>>>>>
>>>>>     //
>>>>>     // Initialize the table contents
>>>>
>>>> (3) Thus far, in the changes to AddTableToList(), two things bother me:
>>>>
>>>> (3a) Before the patch, we'd only convert the physical address to a
>>>> pointer once we knew that the allocation succeeded. Post-patch, we now
>>>> have two branches where we might convert bogus AllocPhysAddress
>> values
>>>> (such as even 0xFFFFFFFF) to (EFI_ACPI_COMMON_HEADER*). I think we
>>>> shouldn't do this. (It's not just the dereferencing of bogus pointers
>>>> that we should avoid, but also the evaluation thereof.)
>>>>
>>>> (3b) "CurrentTableList" is allocated with AllocatePool() not
>>>> AllocateZeroPool(), so *not* setting the "PoolAllocation" field to FALSE
>>>> on the two affected branches is wrong.
>>>>
>>>> The patch looks OK to me otherwise.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Laszlo
>>>>
>>>>> @@ -575,7 +606,7 @@ AddTableToList (
>>>>>       if (((Version & EFI_ACPI_TABLE_VERSION_1_0B) != 0 &&
>>>> AcpiTableInstance->Fadt1 != NULL) ||
>>>>>           ((Version & ACPI_TABLE_VERSION_GTE_2_0)  != 0 &&
>>>> AcpiTableInstance->Fadt3 != NULL)
>>>>>           ) {
>>>>> -      gBS->FreePages (CurrentTableList->PageAddress,
>>>> CurrentTableList->NumberOfPages);
>>>>> +      FreeTableMemory (CurrentTableList);
>>>>>         gBS->FreePool (CurrentTableList);
>>>>>         return EFI_ACCESS_DENIED;
>>>>>       }
>>>>> @@ -729,7 +760,7 @@ AddTableToList (
>>>>>       if (((Version & EFI_ACPI_TABLE_VERSION_1_0B) != 0 &&
>>>> AcpiTableInstance->Facs1 != NULL) ||
>>>>>           ((Version & ACPI_TABLE_VERSION_GTE_2_0)  != 0 &&
>>>> AcpiTableInstance->Facs3 != NULL)
>>>>>           ) {
>>>>> -      gBS->FreePages (CurrentTableList->PageAddress,
>>>> CurrentTableList->NumberOfPages);
>>>>> +      FreeTableMemory (CurrentTableList);
>>>>>         gBS->FreePool (CurrentTableList);
>>>>>         return EFI_ACCESS_DENIED;
>>>>>       }
>>>>> @@ -813,7 +844,7 @@ AddTableToList (
>>>>>       if (((Version & EFI_ACPI_TABLE_VERSION_1_0B) != 0 &&
>>>> AcpiTableInstance->Dsdt1 != NULL) ||
>>>>>           ((Version & ACPI_TABLE_VERSION_GTE_2_0)  != 0 &&
>>>> AcpiTableInstance->Dsdt3 != NULL)
>>>>>           ) {
>>>>> -      gBS->FreePages (CurrentTableList->PageAddress,
>>>> CurrentTableList->NumberOfPages);
>>>>> +      FreeTableMemory (CurrentTableList);
>>>>>         gBS->FreePool (CurrentTableList);
>>>>>         return EFI_ACCESS_DENIED;
>>>>>       }
>>>>> @@ -1449,7 +1480,7 @@ DeleteTable (
>>>>>       //
>>>>>       // Free the Table
>>>>>       //
>>>>> -    gBS->FreePages (Table->PageAddress, Table->NumberOfPages);
>>>>> +    FreeTableMemory (Table);
>>>>>       RemoveEntryList (&(Table->Link));
>>>>>       gBS->FreePool (Table);
>>>>>     }
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-26  6:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-16 15:49 [PATCH 0/3] MdeModulePkg: use pool allocations for ACPI tables Ard Biesheuvel
2020-10-16 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] MdeModulePkg/AcpiTableDxe: use pool allocations when possible Ard Biesheuvel
2020-10-19 19:47   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-22  2:01     ` 回复: " gaoliming
2020-10-22 12:55       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-10-26  1:35         ` 回复: " gaoliming
2020-10-26  6:25           ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-10-26  7:42             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-10-27  8:45               ` 回复: " gaoliming
2020-10-27  9:05                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-10-27 11:07               ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-16 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] MdeModulePkg/AcpiTableDxe: use pool allocation for RSDT/XSDT if possible Ard Biesheuvel
2020-10-19 20:06   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-19 20:11     ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-16 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] MdeModulePkg/AcpiTableDxe: use pool allocation for RSDP " Ard Biesheuvel
2020-10-19 20:13   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-19  1:28 ` FW: [PATCH 0/3] MdeModulePkg: use pool allocations for ACPI tables Wu, Hao A
2020-10-19  1:59   ` Wu, Hao A

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b58d3b6b-40ff-1d0d-a15b-17acb898f0ba@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox