public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>,
	Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] OvmfPkg: raise PcdShellFileOperationSize to 128KB
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:58:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b82b3803-84a8-254b-6dc2-4fc3fa9cd626@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ecb1a31-001f-f57e-c97c-afd527383fa9@redhat.com>

On 1/15/21 11:09 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 01/15/21 10:34, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 1/13/21 9:54 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>>
>>> The virtio-fs daemon of QEMU advertizes a 128KB maximum buffer size by
>>> default, for the FUSE_WRITE operation.
>>
>> I delayed this patch review because I couldn't find where this value
>> is advertized in QEMU (virtiofsd is very new to me). Can you enlighten
>> me please?
> 
> Yes, absolutely. It's really difficult to find. I actually started to
> capture all that information in what would be commit 6f7bc7196ff2
> ("OvmfPkg/VirtioFsDxe: implement the wrapper function for FUSE_WRITE",
> 2020-12-21), or perhaps in this patch even -- but in the end, it was
> such a divergent set of commits, originating actually in the "libfuse"
> project, from which virtiofsd was forked, that I decided to drop it.
> 
> So, in virtiofsd, you actually have to look for the *page count* that
> corresponds to 128KB -- FUSE_DEFAULT_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ (32).
> 
> In the fuse_session_new() function, we have
> 
>     se->conn.max_write = UINT_MAX;
>     se->bufsize = FUSE_MAX_MAX_PAGES * getpagesize() + FUSE_BUFFER_HEADER_SIZE;
> 
> In the do_init() function, which handles the FUSE_INIT request, we have
> 
>     size_t bufsize = se->bufsize;
> 
> then
> 
>     if (!(arg->flags & FUSE_MAX_PAGES)) {
>         size_t max_bufsize = FUSE_DEFAULT_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ * getpagesize() +
>                              FUSE_BUFFER_HEADER_SIZE;
>         if (bufsize > max_bufsize) {
>             bufsize = max_bufsize;
>         }
>     }
> 
> and later
> 
>     if (se->conn.max_write > bufsize - FUSE_BUFFER_HEADER_SIZE) {
>         se->conn.max_write = bufsize - FUSE_BUFFER_HEADER_SIZE;
>     }
> 
> and then
> 
>     outarg.max_write = se->conn.max_write;
> 
> It's super convoluted, because a bunch of flags are handled, and they
> all control the buffer size one way or another, and so the various
> limits are converted and enforced back and forth. In practice, the
> virtio-fs driver in OVMF does not set the FUSE_MAX_PAGES flag in the
> FUSE_INIT request, and so in virtiofsd, we first reduce "bufsize" from
> 
>   FUSE_MAX_MAX_PAGES             * getpagesize() + FUSE_BUFFER_HEADER_SIZE;
> 
> to
> 
>   FUSE_DEFAULT_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ * getpagesize() + FUSE_BUFFER_HEADER_SIZE;
> 
> and then calculate "max_write" by subtracting FUSE_BUFFER_HEADER_SIZE.
> The result is
> 
>   FUSE_DEFAULT_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ * getpagesize()
> 
> which is 128 KB.
> 
> 
> In the libfuse project <https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse.git>, one
> related commit is:
> 
>   https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/commit/027d0d17c8a4
> 
> and before that,
> 
>   https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/commit/97f4a9cb4fc69
> 
> If you try to peek even before that, you end up with historical commits
> like
> 
>   https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/commit/065f222cd5850
> 
> So basically the *origin* of max_write=128KB is untraceable :) But, at
> least the present behavior can be found; it comes from libfuse commit
> 027d0d17c8a4.
> 
> 
> Approaching the same topic from the FUSE client in the Linux kernel,
> commit 5da784cce430 ("fuse: add max_pages to init_out", 2018-10-01) is
> relevant; it also points to the following discussion on LKML:
> <https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/5/136>.
> 
> Again it's convoluted; the direct answer to your question is,
> "max_write=128KB comes from FUSE_DEFAULT_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ, because the
> FUSE_MAX_PAGES flag is not requested in the FUSE_INT operation".

Thanks a lot for the full explanation!
I'm glad I asked this early enough so this was fresh in your
memory :) At least we got it archived on the list.

Shouldn't QEMU announce this via a better mechanism? I.e. a
fw_cfg entry? This is so convoluted (as you said) than I'm
worried libfuse change a parameter and we end having a debug
nightmare figuring the root cause...

Anyhow this is not blocking this patch, so:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>

Regards,

Phil.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-15 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-13  8:54 [PATCH v2 00/10] multiple packages: shell usability improvements Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-13  8:54 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] ShellPkg/Comp: add file buffering Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-13 18:42   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-01-13  8:54 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] OvmfPkg: raise PcdShellFileOperationSize to 128KB Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-15  9:34   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-01-15 10:09     ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-15 15:58       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2021-01-15 18:22         ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-13  8:54 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] ArmVirtPkg: " Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-15 15:59   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-01-15 19:03     ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-13  8:54 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] EmulatorPkg: add OrderedCollectionLib class resolution Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-13 13:20   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-01-18 16:48   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-19  7:55     ` 回复: " gaoliming
2021-01-13  8:54 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] UefiPayloadPkg: " Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-13 13:20   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-01-18 16:48   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-19  4:29     ` Guo Dong
2021-01-13  8:54 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] ShellPkg/ShellCommandLib: add ShellSortFileList() Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-13 13:19   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-01-13  8:54 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] ShellPkg/Ls: sort output by FileName in non-SFO mode Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-13 13:15   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-01-13  8:54 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] ShellPkg/ShellProtocol: sort files by FullName in RemoveDupInFileList() Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-13 13:14   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-01-14 14:19     ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-13  8:54 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] OvmfPkg: disable list length checks in NOOPT and DEBUG builds Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-15  9:30   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-01-13  8:54 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] ArmVirtPkg: " Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-15  9:31   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-01-19 18:39 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 00/10] multiple packages: shell usability improvements Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b82b3803-84a8-254b-6dc2-4fc3fa9cd626@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox