From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 209.132.183.28, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by groups.io with SMTP; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:54:52 -0700 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D99873179B5B; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 07:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-117-191.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.191]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27AE5D9CA; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 07:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] EdkRepo - The Multi-Repository Tool for EDK II To: Nate DeSimone , devel@edk2.groups.io Cc: Andrew Fish , Leif Lindholm , Michael D Kinney References: <20190612000448.20432-1-nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com> From: "Laszlo Ersek" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 09:54:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190612000448.20432-1-nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.41]); Wed, 12 Jun 2019 07:54:50 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Nate, On 06/12/19 02:04, Nate DeSimone wrote: > This patch series is raised to add the EdkRepo and EdkRepo-Manifest branches > to the Edk2-Staging repository. These branches are added to host EdkRepo, > the multi-repository tool for EDK II firmware development to TianoCore. > > For more details on EdkRepo, please see my RFC. > > Nate DeSimone (2): > Add EdkRepo - The Multi-Repo Tool > Add EdkRepo manifest XML > the Maintainers.txt files added in both patches contain sections called "EDK II" and "EDK II Packages". Is that intended? (I'm not familiar with branches in the staging repo.) No comments from me otherwise, I'll defer to the other stewards on this. Thanks! Laszlo