From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: None (no SPF record) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=192.55.52.151; helo=mga17.intel.com; envelope-from=stephano.cetola@linux.intel.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11D592118B7B5 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:13:38 -0800 (PST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Nov 2018 11:13:38 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,241,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="106921796" Received: from scetola-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.182.85]) ([10.254.182.85]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Nov 2018 11:13:37 -0800 To: "Zimmer, Vincent" , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" References: <6535b4dd-57ac-856c-e013-ae8b3203c550@linux.intel.com> <3FEC98D0C33031D6.0465ECFF-1E41-4227-B64B-45BCF39396EA@mail.outlook.com> <76DE84138CBE89489874B70B432D8F9BC7EBA888@ORSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com> From: stephano Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:13:37 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <76DE84138CBE89489874B70B432D8F9BC7EBA888@ORSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com> Subject: Re: [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration Software X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 19:13:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The only reason I didn't include Slack is that it will only log so much information before things start falling off into the ether. Does anyone in the community currently use Slack and know of an easy way of archiving conversations publicly? On 11/16/2018 9:56 AM, Zimmer, Vincent wrote: > https://slack.com/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Kevin D Davis > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 9:35 AM > To: stephano ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org > Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration Software > > > > > > > If we get to vote, I’d vote against Google Groups.  Their interface is very geared toward their internal work flow and seems to change on a whim. Thanks,Kevin > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:08 AM -0600, "stephano" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > We are looking to augment our current communication methods (mailing list / IRC) with a modern solution for group collaboration. The goal is to allow folks to communicate effectively without interrupting the current patch review system, as well as enabling any future systems with more robust options. > > Specific features we are looking for include attachments (currently blocked by the list), robust logging, modern chat, and integration with tools like bug trackers and source repositories (APIs, or better yet, pre-rolled plugins). > > Our current contenders are Google Groups and Groups.io. This RFC is in hopes of finding other options to evaluate. > > Cheers, > Stephano > _______________________________________________ > edk2-devel mailing list > edk2-devel@lists.01.org > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > edk2-devel mailing list > edk2-devel@lists.01.org > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel >