From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com (out03.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.233]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web09.25143.1613349805917050566 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 16:43:26 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=bINaUAc6; spf=none, err=SPF record not found (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.233, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=O9sKEjCIZ1JDcmYSiBpAeJWXla0sjRxu6+NhQumN9j4=; b=bINaUAc6N2xeggExowgvodvrd1 J6PQG81a7Ro/jpyB0VbktMA4lYJ77Xgco55kyYHEfuFt+IVpRDv08XrrBOfPLmfvUybZqdc50jAnH zXrgASu32MnOAeMhlaso7LfYld26vI1ayOhiXa4i6FNp7GUpr5H8r+NHb4nqCFmV55Tw=; Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lBRz1-00BSHK-NI; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 17:43:23 -0700 Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.68]) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lBRz0-00Eo6z-UQ; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 17:43:23 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4325008AB; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 17:43:22 -0700 (MST) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta4.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta4.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 92Cf3OnD8ctq; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 17:43:22 -0700 (MST) Received: from [10.0.10.142] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EE1A50088D; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 17:43:22 -0700 (MST) To: devel@edk2.groups.io, michael.d.kinney@intel.com, "rfc@edk2.groups.io" , 'Bret Barkelew' , Laszlo Ersek , "Gao, Liming" References: From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 17:43:21 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-XM-SPF: eid=1lBRz0-00Eo6z-UQ;;;mid=;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.68;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=none X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.68 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,NICE_REPLY_A,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,TooManyTo_001, TooManyTo_002,TooManyTo_003,TooManyTo_004,TooManyTo_005,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.6 TooManyTo_003 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 4x (uncommon) * 0.5 TooManyTo_004 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 5x (uncommon) * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.5 TooManyTo_002 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 3x (uncommon) * 0.4 TooManyTo_005 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 6x (uncommon) * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] * -0.2 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **;devel@edk2.groups.io, michael.d.kinney@intel.com, "rfc@edk2.groups.io" , 'Bret Barkelew' , Laszlo Ersek , "Gao, Liming" X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 334 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.07 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 12 (3.6%), b_tie_ro: 10 (3.1%), parse: 1.36 (0.4%), extract_message_metadata: 6 (1.9%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.88 (0.6%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.3 (1.0%), tests_pri_-950: 1.35 (0.4%), tests_pri_-900: 1.13 (0.3%), tests_pri_-90: 75 (22.5%), check_bayes: 74 (22.0%), b_tokenize: 6 (1.9%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (1.9%), b_comp_prob: 2.4 (0.7%), b_tok_touch_all: 55 (16.4%), b_finish: 0.97 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 219 (65.5%), check_dkim_signature: 0.61 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 49 (14.7%), poll_dns_idle: 42 (12.6%), tests_pri_10: 3.1 (0.9%), tests_pri_500: 8 (2.4%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] UnitTestFrameworkPkg cmocka submodule alternatives X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/19/20 11:58 AM, Michael D Kinney wrote: > Hello, > > There have been a few suggestions to create a mirror of cmocka in TianoCore > org in GitHub. > > I have found a GitHub action that can do a repo sync. > > https://github.com/marketplace/actions/github-repo-sync > > I have created a temporary mirror of cmocka in my personal GitHub area that > uses this GitHub action to sync all branches and all tags once a day. > > https://github.com/mdkinney/mirror-cmocka > > Here is the GitHub workflow file. It must be in the default branch for the > repo using a branch name that is not present in the repo being mirrored. > In this case, I used a branch name of 'repo-sync'. > > https://github.com/mdkinney/mirror-cmocka/blob/repo-sync/.github/workflows/repo-sync.yml > > Please provide feedback on this approach. If we like this approach, then > I suggest we create a new repo in TianoCore called edk2-cmocka that is a > mirror that is synced once a day and we update the cmocka submodule in the > edk2 repo to use edk2-cmocka. I just noticed this never got committed: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/.gitmodules still shows the old URL. -- Rebecca Cran