From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.9062.1601546755895222285
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Thu, 01 Oct 2020 03:05:56 -0700
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=VEQ7NsdA;
 spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 216.205.24.124, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1601546755;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=aTYfBFbmne9uLxhG7lqPxELD3cDFxOK3Idyu8/mjEC4=;
	b=VEQ7NsdAiPrPx/OWXmhUd+Oxgd0WH4OjjWYixdDxFwDGbch9KL4hN3u2BkMmevbNjS0oci
	pBFQN2IdRbkny+BeJftAGMfUtBOtFlEKml6o25DA6r5t0g+s3C+4JxzMBUEh7e23sQdxDc
	2lOzGMF25fcUR+qnClOkj5MjWEpwVPQ=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-35-XWABKqx7OkSDFmSdZBP7fw-1; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 06:05:52 -0400
X-MC-Unique: XWABKqx7OkSDFmSdZBP7fw-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7262425EA;
	Thu,  1 Oct 2020 10:05:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-113-110.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.110])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E0D5D9D3;
	Thu,  1 Oct 2020 10:05:46 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/1] ShellPkg/DynamicCommand: add HttpDynamicCommand
To: "Gao, Zhichao" <zhichao.gao@intel.com>,
 Vladimir Olovyannikov <vladimir.olovyannikov@broadcom.com>,
 "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <Samer.El-Haj-Mahmoud@arm.com>,
 Maciej Rabeda <maciej.rabeda@linux.intel.com>,
 "Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>, "Fu, Siyuan" <siyuan.fu@intel.com>,
 "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>, Nd <nd@arm.com>,
 "gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn" <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
References: <c71336d271a32eb555427963a680f356@mail.gmail.com>
 <DM6PR11MB4425518E59BD76E21687D43CF6330@DM6PR11MB4425.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <bb993420-f1fe-8d40-27f3-0234caadedb2@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 12:05:45 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB4425518E59BD76E21687D43CF6330@DM6PR11MB4425.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com;
	auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=lersek@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 09/30/20 03:04, Gao, Zhichao wrote:
> If the maintainers/reviewers don't have response for more than two weeks, you can always push them.

If initial feedback does not appear in *one* week, pinging the
maintainer is justified.

Thanks
Laszlo