From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com (out03.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.233]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.35099.1589769001035213349 for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 19:30:01 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=FTuricL9; spf=pass (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.233, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rRWva+1Q3wWaGf87xSRnZZxj2rJ1tBi3N/52nm4w6Uo=; b=FTuricL9GAE7WGRixjmxHOMAcO hR+8ylb9OHRxU92Uy9w1OK7iqnffT1Av7JqwG05xIYmrmMYXggHrlengqcLKpIV+AVtnKJB1nUCiq VOr938m8SwTItpYSxk0IfrtC3Hh/l6bzTsn8qg8lKoljU9KiWpJToHOVIx+mVvio/waw=; Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaVXT-0004RJ-S7; Sun, 17 May 2020 20:29:59 -0600 Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.68]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jaVXT-0001ln-5U; Sun, 17 May 2020 20:29:59 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67255002AB; Sun, 17 May 2020 20:29:58 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta4.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta4.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id SMRmi6PAnPSR; Sun, 17 May 2020 20:29:58 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B38A5002A2; Sun, 17 May 2020 20:29:58 -0600 (MDT) To: rfc@edk2.groups.io, lersek@redhat.com, bret.barkelew@microsoft.com, "Kinney, Michael D" , "devel@edk2.groups.io" References: <8389d6a6-aaf5-3c0e-904f-84f814c9d385@redhat.com> <193b34a1-73ef-a8de-4feb-0d7b829650de@redhat.com> From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 20:29:57 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <193b34a1-73ef-a8de-4feb-0d7b829650de@redhat.com> X-XM-SPF: eid=1jaVXT-0001ln-5U;;;mid=;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.68;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.68 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,TooManyTo_001,TooManyTo_002, TooManyTo_003,TooManyTo_004,TooManyTo_005,XMSubLong,XM_B_Unicode autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5001] * 0.5 TooManyTo_002 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 3x (uncommon) * 0.6 TooManyTo_003 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 4x (uncommon) * 0.5 TooManyTo_004 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 5x (uncommon) * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.4 TooManyTo_005 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 6x (uncommon) * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 XM_B_Unicode BODY: Testing for specific types of unicode * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: ; sa07 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **;rfc@edk2.groups.io, lersek@redhat.com, bret.barkelew@microsoft.com, "Kinney, Michael D" , "devel@edk2.groups.io" X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 407 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 11 (2.6%), b_tie_ro: 9 (2.3%), parse: 1.33 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 15 (3.6%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.02 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 10 (2.5%), tests_pri_-950: 1.27 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.04 (0.3%), tests_pri_-90: 48 (11.7%), check_bayes: 46 (11.4%), b_tokenize: 5 (1.3%), b_tok_get_all: 5 (1.2%), b_comp_prob: 2.1 (0.5%), b_tok_touch_all: 31 (7.5%), b_finish: 0.87 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 309 (75.9%), check_dkim_signature: 0.62 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 24 (5.9%), poll_dns_idle: 22 (5.4%), tests_pri_10: 2.1 (0.5%), tests_pri_500: 6 (1.6%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US On 5/15/20 1:34 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 05/14/20 23:26, Bret Barkelew via groups.io wrote: > >> It’s code management for the Instagram generation > I find this an extremely good characterization! > > And, I find the fact soul-destroying. I was working on a web project recently, and apparently people don't even check email any more! So someone had set up a Slack channel where Github pull requests were posted/linked, and we were supposed to react with thumbs-up, "OK" etc. emoji to indicate we'd seen/reviewed/accepted the request. -- Rebecca Cran