From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A71C922364892 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 05:10:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB2CE4D4B6; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-120-185.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.185]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4124F5C582; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:15:59 +0000 (UTC) To: "Gao, Liming" , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" References: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E1B9F76@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:15:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E1B9F76@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove X86 .asm and .S assembly files in EDK2 X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:10:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/31/18 12:06, Gao, Liming wrote: > Edk2 has used nasm assembly file for all tool chains. So, IA32 and > X64 .asm and .S assembly files can be removed if their nasm files are > ready. It can save the maintain effort and avoid the confuse. > > > > If you have any comments on this change, please let me know. My comment is that I greatly welcome the removal of .S and .asm files :) Thanks! Laszlo