From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web09.412.1616001304053053023 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:15:04 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=hYykio+g; spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 170.10.133.124, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1616001303; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cC+m3IQMZiHn9Oa7r4vVliZh06Zmg8Kr0LVRWQKX3Jc=; b=hYykio+g32uGC/7of5lZUFVieAkVpQgesBFx908f0qb+QKEOVgtqZJ5YlT+oo69yhIkMpX YYNAoKr1/M5srx+daH1mjiORVePJp2r41HpSVxU0m+foKv+gQ3OKBBT9XTfN5vI7DzdDoZ 4qjmGPEaYJQGVQet0XVQZi7ds1f5ESw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-170-eEcJFhQVMEKIURrY2OMP0Q-1; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:14:59 -0400 X-MC-Unique: eEcJFhQVMEKIURrY2OMP0Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55E1894F0B; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 17:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-113-112.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.112]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001C160853; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 17:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [edk2-discuss] Google Summer of Code Interested Student To: "Desimone, Nathaniel L" , "discuss@edk2.groups.io" Cc: "cadenkline9@gmail.com" , edk2-devel-groups-io , "Ard Biesheuvel (TianoCore)" , "Leif Lindholm (Nuvia address)" References: <848a0cdb-accf-5b7c-df59-65a806ea14a7@redhat.com> <166B8219924C8DCE.3757@groups.io> <3d466515-7d65-9abe-3609-d0298c1b245b@redhat.com> From: "Laszlo Ersek" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:14:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=lersek@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/17/21 00:25, Desimone, Nathaniel L wrote: > The UEFI spec doesn't read on this at all, even though it describes > VT100 and VT100+ as separate modes... it doesn't say how they differ. > I agree with you that it seems reasonable for VT100 to keep character > output to strict ASCII only... that way the "+" in VT100+ actually > means something. I've updated the wiki accordingly. > > I'd advocate for the default to be switched to VT_UTF8. I really > don't think you will run into many terminal emulators that don't > implement UTF-8 anymore, XTerm included. Those who want pure ASCII > output can switch to VT100. Hmmm, OK. As long as I can permanently switch my domains, one by one, to VT100, I guess I'll be fine. Thanks! Laszlo