public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: bob.c.feng@intel.com
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>,
	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
	Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch 00/10 V8] Enable multiple process AutoGen
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 15:08:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c6e67a5d-8325-e542-eea2-12d3e69d0e84@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190807042537.11928-1-bob.c.feng@intel.com>

(+ Andrew, Leif, Mike; Liming)

On 08/07/19 06:25, Bob Feng wrote:
> BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1875
>
> In order to improve the build performance, we implemented
> multiple-processes AutoGen. This change will reduce 20% time
> for AutoGen phase.
>
> The design document can be got from:
> https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/files/Designs/2019/0627/Multiple-thread-AutoGen.pdf
>
> This patch serial pass the build of Ovmf, MinKabylake, MinPurley,
> packages under Edk2 repository and intel client and server platforms.
>
> V8:
> 1. Fixed a regression issue that AsbuildInf files are not generated.
> That was introduced by V7.
>
> V7:
> 1. Fixed regression issue for build -m, build modules, build
> libraries. implement this fix in patch 05/10.
>
> 2. Fixed the regression issue for duplicat items in PcdTokenNumber
> file. implement this fix in patch 02/10.
>
> V6:
>
> This version fixed a regression issue on incremental build.
> The change is in patch 04/10
>
> In the autogen sub-process, we need to use
> PlatformInfo.Pcds rather than PlatformInfo.Platform.Pcds
> because we don't want to re-evaluate the Pcds in
> the autogen sub-process.
>
> V5:
> Restructure the patches of V4. Squash 11/11 patch of V4 into V5 4/10,
> 5/10 and 10/10.
>
> The details of the changes are as following:
>
> 1. Update Log queue maxsize as the value of thread number * 10.
> This change is implemented in patch 10/10
>
> 2. Fixed the regression issue that the PCDs from build command line
> are not passed into autogen sub-process correctly.
>
> 3. Fixed the regression issue that the exception raised inside
> autogen sub-process is not well handled, including code exception
> and Ctrl+C keyboard interrupt.
>
> The above 2 changes are implemented in patch 5/10
>
> 4. Fixed the regression issue that multiple builds of the same
> driver/application with FILE_GUID overrides is not handle correctly.
>
> 5. Fixed the regression issue that shared fixed PCD between lib
> and module is not handle correctly, which cause the autogen.c and
> autogen.h are different from orignal.
>
> The above 2 changes are implemented in patch 4/10
>

Thank you for the above explanation!


(1) In my clone of the QEMU repository (master @ v4.1.0-rc4), I advanced
the roms/edk2 submodule to commit 96603b4f02b9 ("BaseTools/PatchCheck:
Disable text conversion in 'git show'", 2019-08-07), and applied your
patches on top. Then I ran

$ nice make -j4 -C roms efi

in the QEMU project root.

This build forces the usage of Python2, due to
<https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1607>.

The build worked fine, Ctrl-S / Ctrl-Q worked fine, and the resultant
firmware binaries all worked fine. All good.


(2) QEMU carries a simpe UEFI application that exposes SMBIOS anchor
addresses, and ACPI RSD PTR addresses, from the UEFI guest to some QEMU
unit tests that run on the host. In the same environment as (1), I
rebuilt this application:

$ nice make -j4 -C tests/uefi-test-tools

This command uses the "-m" switch of "build", internally. It also forces
Python2, due to <https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1607>.

The build completed fine, and I tested the AARCH64 and X64 binaries
(bootable ISO images). They worked fine. Good.


(3) In my normal edk2 clone, I cleaned the tree, applied your patches
(again on top of commit 96603b4f02b9), and started a build:

$ . edksetup.sh
$ nice make -C "$EDK_TOOLS_PATH" -j $(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
$ nice -n 19 build \
    -a IA32 \
    -p OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32.dsc \
    -t GCC48 \
    -b NOOPT \
    -n 4 \
    -D SMM_REQUIRE \
    -D SECURE_BOOT_ENABLE \
    -D NETWORK_TLS_ENABLE \
    -D NETWORK_IP6_ENABLE \
    -D NETWORK_HTTP_BOOT_ENABLE \
    --report-file=.../build.ovmf.32.report \
    --log=.../build.ovmf.32.log \
    --cmd-len=65536 \
    --hash \
    --genfds-multi-thread

This command located Python3:

> WORKSPACE        = .../edk2
> EDK_TOOLS_PATH   = .../edk2/BaseTools
> CONF_PATH        = .../edk2/Conf
> PYTHON_COMMAND   = /usr/bin/python3.6
>
>
> Processing meta-data .
> Architecture(s)  = IA32
> Build target     = NOOPT
> Toolchain        = GCC48

The build launched fine.

After 10-20 seconds into the build, I interrupted it with Ctrl-C:

> build.py...
>  : error 7000: Failed to execute command
>         make tbuild [.../edk2/Build/OvmfIa32/NOOPT_GCC48/IA32/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib]
>
>
> build.py...
>  : error 7000: Failed to execute command
>         make tbuild [.../edk2/Build/OvmfIa32/NOOPT_GCC48/IA32/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDriver1CommandsLib/UefiShellDriver1CommandsLib]
>
>
> build.py...
>  : error 7000: Failed to execute command
>         make tbuild [.../edk2/Build/OvmfIa32/NOOPT_GCC48/IA32/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/OpensslLib]
>
>
> build.py...
>  : error 7000: Failed to execute command
>         make tbuild [.../edk2/Build/OvmfIa32/NOOPT_GCC48/IA32/MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/BaseLib]
>
> - Aborted -
> Build end time: 14:05:56, Aug.08 2019
> Build total time: 00:00:15

As next step, I repeated the same "build" command as above, in order to
continue the interrupted build. Unfortunately, this failed:

> WORKSPACE        = .../edk2
> EDK_TOOLS_PATH   = .../edk2/BaseTools
> CONF_PATH        = .../edk2/Conf
> PYTHON_COMMAND   = /usr/bin/python3.6
>
>
> Processing meta-data
> .Architecture(s)  = IA32
> Build target     = NOOPT
> Toolchain        = GCC48
>
> Active Platform          = .../edk2/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32.dsc
> ..... done!
>
> Fd File Name:OVMF (.../edk2/Build/OvmfIa32/NOOPT_GCC48/FV/OVMF.fd)
>
> Generate Region at Offset 0x0
>    Region Size = 0x40000
>    Region Name = DATA
>
> Generate Region at Offset 0x40000
>    Region Size = 0x1000
>    Region Name = None
>
> Generate Region at Offset 0x41000
>    Region Size = 0x1000
>    Region Name = DATA
>
> Generate Region at Offset 0x42000
>    Region Size = 0x42000
>    Region Name = None
>
> Generate Region at Offset 0x84000
>    Region Size = 0x348000
>    Region Name = FV
>
> Generating FVMAIN_COMPACT FV
>
> Generating PEIFV FV
> ###### ['GenFv', '-a', '.../edk2/Build/OvmfIa32/NOOPT_GCC48/FV/Ffs/PEIFV.inf', '-o', '.../edk2/Build/OvmfIa32/NOOPT_GCC48/FV/PEIFV.Fv', '-i', '.../edk2/Build/OvmfIa32/NOOPT_GCC48/FV/PEIFV.inf']
> Return Value = 2
> GenFv: ERROR 0001: Error opening file
>   .../edk2/Build/OvmfIa32/NOOPT_GCC48/FV/Ffs/52C05B14-0B98-496c-BC3B-04B50211D680PeiCore/52C05B14-0B98-496c-BC3B-04B50211D680.ffs
>
>
>
>
> build.py...
>  : error 7000: Failed to generate FV
>
>
>
> build.py...
>  : error 7000: Failed to execute command
>
>
> - Failed -
> Build end time: 14:06:25, Aug.08 2019
> Build total time: 00:00:06

To be honest, I'm not sure what to ask for, at this point.

- On one hand, this is certainly not ideal. Continuing a manually
interrupted build should preferably work -- that's a form of incremental
build. And, it did work in my v3 testing; see bullet (5) in:

  http://mid.mail-archive.com/4ea3d3fa-2210-3642-2337-db525312d312@redhat.com
  https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/44246

(Is this perhaps a regression from the V6 update, which was related to
incremental builds?)

- On the other hand, this is not necessarily show-stopper, and I'm quite
out of capacity for testing further versions of this full patch set.
Perhaps you can work on this issue incrementally -- bugfixes can be
accepted during the freeze periods.

I don't feel comfortable giving Tested-by or Regression-tested-by in
this state, but I also won't block the patch set from being merged.

Note that this problem appears repeatable, and it reproduces using
Python2 as well. It should be possible for you to reproduce and to
debug.


(4) In this test, I repeated (3), but instead of interrupting the build
with Ctrl-C, I introduced a syntax error to one of the C source files
under OvmfPkg (I simply appended the constant "1" to the end of the
file).

As expected, the build failed (and correctly stopped, too):

> .../edk2/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/SnpReceive.c:186:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before numeric constant
>  1
>  ^
> make: *** [.../edk2/Build/OvmfIa32/NOOPT_GCC48/IA32/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/VirtioNet/OUTPUT/SnpReceive.obj] Error 1
>
>
> build.py...
>  : error 7000: Failed to execute command
>         make tbuild [.../edk2/Build/OvmfIa32/NOOPT_GCC48/IA32/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/VirtioNet]
>
>
> build.py...
>  : error F002: Failed to build module
>         .../edk2/OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/VirtioNet.inf [IA32, GCC48, NOOPT]
>
> - Failed -
> Build end time: 14:29:18, Aug.08 2019
> Build total time: 00:00:38

I undid the syntax error, and repeated the "build" command.

The build resumed fine, and produced a functional OVMF binary. Good.


(5) I also verified that changes to C files, made after the build
completed successfully for the first time, would cause those files to be
re-built, if the "build" command was repeated. So that's OK too.


... All in all, I think the series is mature enough to merge, in order
to expose it to wider testing by the community, with the soft feature
freeze just around the corner. The main functionality seems to work,
there don't seem to be show-stoppers. IMO a BaseTools series doesn't
have to be *perfect* -- as long as it doesn't get in the way of people
doing their work, it should be possible to improve upon, incrementally.
Therefore, from my side, I'm willing to give you a (somewhat reserved)

Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

for the series.

I suggest seeking feedback from the other stewards as well.

To reiterate, the only issue I have found is that the build could not be
resumed after I interrupted it with Ctrl-C, in section (3). If there is
consensus to push the v8 series with that, I would suggest filing a
TianoCore BZ about issue (3) first, and to reference the BZ as a "known
issue" in the commit message of patch#4 or patch#5.

Thanks
Laszlo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-08 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-07  4:25 [Patch 00/10 V8] Enable multiple process AutoGen Bob Feng
2019-08-07  4:25 ` [Patch 01/10 V8] BaseTools: Singleton the object to handle build conf file Bob Feng
2019-08-07  4:25 ` [Patch 02/10 V8] BaseTools: Split WorkspaceAutoGen._InitWorker into multiple functions Bob Feng
2019-08-07  4:25 ` [Patch 03/10 V8] BaseTools: Add functions to get platform scope build options Bob Feng
2019-08-07  4:25 ` [Patch 04/10 V8] BaseTools: Decouple AutoGen Objects Bob Feng
2019-08-22  8:04   ` [edk2-devel] " Gary Lin
2019-08-22  8:15     ` Bob Feng
2019-08-22  8:26       ` Gary Lin
2019-08-07  4:25 ` [Patch 05/10 V8] BaseTools: Enable Multiple Process AutoGen Bob Feng
2019-09-24  1:18   ` [edk2-devel] " dann frazier
2019-09-24  2:25     ` Bob Feng
2019-09-24 12:49       ` dann frazier
2019-08-07  4:25 ` [Patch 06/10 V8] BaseTools: Add shared data for processes Bob Feng
2019-08-07  4:25 ` [Patch 07/10 V8] BaseTools: Add LogAgent to support multiple process Autogen Bob Feng
2019-08-07  4:25 ` [Patch 08/10 V8] BaseTools: Move BuildOption parser out of build.py Bob Feng
2019-08-07  4:25 ` [Patch 09/10 V8] BaseTools: Add the support for python 2 Bob Feng
2019-08-07  4:25 ` [Patch 10/10 V8] BaseTools: Enable block queue log agent Bob Feng
2019-08-08 13:08 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-08-08 13:45   ` [edk2-devel] [Patch 00/10 V8] Enable multiple process AutoGen Leif Lindholm
2019-08-08 15:38     ` Bob Feng
2019-08-08 22:18       ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-08 23:29         ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-09  0:49           ` Liming Gao
2019-08-09  1:37             ` Bob Feng
2019-08-09 12:54               ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-09 13:28                 ` Leif Lindholm
2019-08-09 14:54                   ` Liming Gao
2019-08-09 15:31                     ` Leif Lindholm
2019-08-09 15:09                   ` Bob Feng
2019-08-09 14:42                 ` Bob Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c6e67a5d-8325-e542-eea2-12d3e69d0e84@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox