From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Olovyannikov <vladimir.olovyannikov@broadcom.com>,
devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>,
Maciej Rabeda <maciej.rabeda@linux.intel.com>,
Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>, Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>,
Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>, Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>,
Nd <nd@arm.com>,
Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <Samer.El-Haj-Mahmoud@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/1] ShellPkg/DynamicCommand: add HttpDynamicCommand
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:32:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7d9c705-c213-2f41-cd37-56da435be905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200909184904.11129-1-vladimir.olovyannikov@broadcom.com>
On 09/09/20 20:49, Vladimir Olovyannikov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Olovyannikov <vladimir.olovyannikov@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
> Cc: Maciej Rabeda <maciej.rabeda@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
> Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> Cc: Nd <nd@arm.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Cc: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <Samer.El-Haj-Mahmoud@arm.com>
>
> This patchset introduces an http client utilizing EDK2 HTTP protocol, to
> allow fast image downloading from http/https servers.
> HTTP download speed is usually faster than tftp.
> The client is based on the same approach as tftp dynamic command, and
> uses the same UEFI Shell command line parameters. This makes it easy
> integrating http into existing UEFI Shell scripts.
> Note that to enable HTTP download, feature Pcd
> gEfiNetworkPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdAllowHttpConnections must be set to TRUE.
>
> BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2860
>
> PATCH v11 changes:
> Address comments from Laszlo:
> - use TimeBaseLib.h header to get rid of duplicated constants;
> - explicitly return UINT32 in EfiTimeToEpoch().
to be clear, I explicitly *disagree* with returning UINT32 from
EfiTimeToEpoch().
I'm not "demanding" (or even suggesting) that you update the
EfiTimeToEpoch() implementation in this patch to return UINTN, but I'd
like to be very clear that, IMO, for EfiTimeToEpoch() to suffer from a
year 2106 problem on 64-bit systems too, is bad design. So please don't
list the UINT32 return type as my suggestion -- that's the exact
opposite of what I'd actually suggest.
Zhichao: are you ready to merge this patch? If so, please let me know;
I'll test it then.
Thanks
Laszlo
>
>
> Vladimir Olovyannikov (1):
> ShellPkg/DynamicCommand: add HttpDynamicCommand
>
> ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dec | 1 +
> ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc | 5 +
> .../HttpDynamicCommand/HttpApp.inf | 58 +
> .../HttpDynamicCommand/HttpDynamicCommand.inf | 63 +
> .../DynamicCommand/HttpDynamicCommand/Http.h | 91 +
> ShellPkg/Include/Guid/ShellLibHiiGuid.h | 5 +
> .../DynamicCommand/HttpDynamicCommand/Http.c | 1823 +++++++++++++++++
> .../HttpDynamicCommand/HttpApp.c | 61 +
> .../HttpDynamicCommand/HttpDynamicCommand.c | 137 ++
> .../HttpDynamicCommand/Http.uni | 117 ++
> 10 files changed, 2361 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 ShellPkg/DynamicCommand/HttpDynamicCommand/HttpApp.inf
> create mode 100644 ShellPkg/DynamicCommand/HttpDynamicCommand/HttpDynamicCommand.inf
> create mode 100644 ShellPkg/DynamicCommand/HttpDynamicCommand/Http.h
> create mode 100644 ShellPkg/DynamicCommand/HttpDynamicCommand/Http.c
> create mode 100644 ShellPkg/DynamicCommand/HttpDynamicCommand/HttpApp.c
> create mode 100644 ShellPkg/DynamicCommand/HttpDynamicCommand/HttpDynamicCommand.c
> create mode 100644 ShellPkg/DynamicCommand/HttpDynamicCommand/Http.uni
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-10 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-09 18:49 [PATCH v11 0/1] ShellPkg/DynamicCommand: add HttpDynamicCommand Vladimir Olovyannikov
2020-09-09 18:49 ` [PATCH v11 1/1] " Vladimir Olovyannikov
2020-09-10 6:32 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-09-10 20:33 ` [PATCH v11 0/1] " Vladimir Olovyannikov
2020-09-11 7:19 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-09-11 17:04 ` Vladimir Olovyannikov
2020-09-14 0:51 ` Gao, Zhichao
2020-09-14 4:37 ` Vladimir Olovyannikov
2020-09-14 8:19 ` Gao, Zhichao
2020-09-14 18:54 ` Vladimir Olovyannikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7d9c705-c213-2f41-cd37-56da435be905@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox