From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com>
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org, jordan.l.justen@intel.com,
ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, julien.grall@arm.com,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] OvmfPkg/XenSupport: remove usage of prefetchable PCI host bridge aperture
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:15:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c97f13ad-b9c0-6716-7c34-9d2e226297a6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190319140319.GJ11621@perard.uk.xensource.com>
On 03/19/19 15:03, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 07:45:56PM +0000, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>> On 14/03/2019 17:41, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 12:40:54PM +0000, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>>>> This aperture doesn't exist in OVMF and trying to use it causes
>>>
>>> I'm trying to understand what you mean by writing "doesn't exist in
>>> OVMF". Are prefetchable BAR not handled by ScanForRootBridges() ?
>>> Or is it the emulation of the config space that isn't correct?
>>> Maybe QEMU should lies about a BAR been prefetchable?
>>
>> The problem here is: hvmloader places BARs initially disregarding
>> prefetchable bit in an arbitrary order because essentially there is only
>> 1 aperture for the host bridge in emulated system under Xen (and KVM as
>> well). In PcatPciRootBridgeParseBars() we construct apertures for high
>> level OVMF code by reading the BAR placement information after
>> hvmloader. It often appears that there are prefetchable and
>> non-prefetchable BARs coexist with each other and make prefetchable and
>> non-prefetchable apertures overlap. This eventually triggers an
>> assertion in high level OVMF code because that shouldn't happen.
>
> Thanks for the explanation. Could you add it to the patch description?
>
>> OVMF for KVM is not using prefetchable BAR at all - see
>> PciHostBridgeGetRootBridges() in which it passes mNonExistAperture dummy
>> object to high level code. I think it's wrong to construct a
>> prefetchable aperture for Xen and this code should be removed as it's
>> done for QEMU-KVM. Do you think this patch needs to do that?
>
> It would be nice to remove the code that isn't useful so feel free to do
> it and/or keep the current patch with the description updated.
Right -- I'd like to add one keyword here, for background: EFI_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_COMBINE_MEM_PMEM. (It's documented in both edk2 [MdePkg/Include/Protocol/PciHostBridgeResourceAllocation.h] and the PI spec [EFI_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_RESOURCE_ALLOCATION_PROTOCOL.GetAllocAttributes()].)
Thanks
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-20 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-06 12:40 [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Xen PCI passthrough fixes Igor Druzhinin
2019-03-06 12:40 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/3] OvmfPkg/XenSupport: remove usage of prefetchable PCI host bridge aperture Igor Druzhinin
2019-03-14 17:41 ` Anthony PERARD
2019-03-14 19:45 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-03-19 14:03 ` Anthony PERARD
2019-03-20 11:15 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
[not found] ` <20190322082650.tk65vju74g4gt7vj@MacBook-Air-de-Roger.local>
2019-03-22 9:06 ` [Xen-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
[not found] ` <20190324035053.xs3yccnpmn5dy6cl@MacBook-Air-de-Roger.local>
2019-03-25 14:32 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-03-06 12:40 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/3] OvmfPkg/XenSupport: use a correct PCI host bridge aperture for BAR64 Igor Druzhinin
2019-03-14 17:44 ` Anthony PERARD
2019-03-06 12:40 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/3] OvmfPkg/XenSupport: turn off address decoding before BAR sizing Igor Druzhinin
2019-03-06 13:22 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-03-06 14:26 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-03-06 17:39 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-03-14 17:55 ` Anthony PERARD
2019-03-14 20:09 ` Igor Druzhinin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c97f13ad-b9c0-6716-7c34-9d2e226297a6@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox