* [PATCH v2 1/1] uefi-sct/SctPkg AdapterInfo SetInformation may return unsupported
@ 2019-09-18 8:48 Tom Zhao
2019-09-19 6:17 ` Eric Jin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tom Zhao @ 2019-09-18 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devel; +Cc: Eric Jin, Supreeth Venkatesh
If AdapterInfo.SetInformation() is unsupported, it will return
EFI_UNSUPPORTED. Do not fail the test in this case.
Cc: Supreeth Venkatesh <supreeth.venkatesh@arm.com>
Cc: Eric Jin <eric.jin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Zhao <tzhao@solarflare.com>
---
Notes:
v2:
- Change commit message to be closer to similar issues.
uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestConformance.c | 4 ++--
uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestFunction.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git
a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestConformance.c
b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestConformance.c
index fb42398e4a97..3dc048db5333 100644
---
a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestConformance.c
+++
b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestConformance.c
@@ -556,8 +556,8 @@ BBTestSetInformationConformanceTestCheckpoint2 (
NULL,
InformationBlockSize
);
- - if ( Status != EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER && Status !=
EFI_WRITE_PROTECTED) {
+
+ if ( Status != EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER && Status !=
EFI_WRITE_PROTECTED && Status != EFI_UNSUPPORTED) {
AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
} else {
AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
diff --git
a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestFunction.c
b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestFunction.c
index 334bb9edc493..4b054b0ef7d8 100644
---
a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestFunction.c
+++
b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestFunction.c
@@ -372,11 +372,11 @@ BBTestSetInformationFunctionTestCheckpoint1 (
InformationBlockSize1
);
- if (Status == EFI_SUCCESS || Status == EFI_WRITE_PROTECTED)
- AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED; + if (Status ==
EFI_SUCCESS || Status == EFI_WRITE_PROTECTED || Status == EFI_UNSUPPORTED)
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
else
- AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED; - +
AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+
StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
StandardLib,
AssertionType,
--
2.21.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] uefi-sct/SctPkg AdapterInfo SetInformation may return unsupported
2019-09-18 8:48 [PATCH v2 1/1] uefi-sct/SctPkg AdapterInfo SetInformation may return unsupported Tom Zhao
@ 2019-09-19 6:17 ` Eric Jin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Jin @ 2019-09-19 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Zhao, devel@edk2.groups.io; +Cc: Supreeth Venkatesh, Liu, XianhuiX
EFI_UNSUPPORTED The InformationType is not known.
The description is described as above in UEFI Spec.
In this case, the test gets the InformationType from EFI_ADAPTER_GET_INFO(), so the SetInformationfunction return EFI_UNSUPPORTED doesn't make sense. The reason is not covered by spec at least.
How about to do some basic check in device or return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR.
And the test could add EFI_DEVICE_ERROR into acceptable return code.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Zhao <tzhao@solarflare.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 4:48 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Jin, Eric <eric.jin@intel.com>; Supreeth Venkatesh <supreeth.venkatesh@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] uefi-sct/SctPkg AdapterInfo SetInformation may return unsupported
If AdapterInfo.SetInformation() is unsupported, it will return EFI_UNSUPPORTED. Do not fail the test in this case.
Cc: Supreeth Venkatesh <supreeth.venkatesh@arm.com>
Cc: Eric Jin <eric.jin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Zhao <tzhao@solarflare.com>
---
Notes:
v2:
- Change commit message to be closer to similar issues.
uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestConformance.c | 4 ++--
uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestFunction.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git
a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestConformance.c
b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestConformance.c
index fb42398e4a97..3dc048db5333 100644
---
a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestConformance.c
+++
b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestConformance.c
@@ -556,8 +556,8 @@ BBTestSetInformationConformanceTestCheckpoint2 (
NULL,
InformationBlockSize
);
- - if ( Status != EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER && Status !=
EFI_WRITE_PROTECTED) {
+
+ if ( Status != EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER && Status !=
EFI_WRITE_PROTECTED && Status != EFI_UNSUPPORTED) {
AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
} else {
AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED; diff --git a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestFunction.c
b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestFunction.c
index 334bb9edc493..4b054b0ef7d8 100644
---
a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestFunction.c
+++
b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/IHV/Protocol/AdapterInfo/BlackBoxTest/AdapterInfoBBTestFunction.c
@@ -372,11 +372,11 @@ BBTestSetInformationFunctionTestCheckpoint1 (
InformationBlockSize1
);
- if (Status == EFI_SUCCESS || Status == EFI_WRITE_PROTECTED)
- AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED; + if (Status ==
EFI_SUCCESS || Status == EFI_WRITE_PROTECTED || Status == EFI_UNSUPPORTED)
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
else
- AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED; - +
AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+
StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
StandardLib,
AssertionType,
--
2.21.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-19 6:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-09-18 8:48 [PATCH v2 1/1] uefi-sct/SctPkg AdapterInfo SetInformation may return unsupported Tom Zhao
2019-09-19 6:17 ` Eric Jin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox