From: "Liran Alon" <liran.alon@oracle.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: nikita.leshchenko@oracle.com, aaron.young@oracle.com,
jordan.l.justen@intel.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 15/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Support sending SCSI request and receive response
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 01:04:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc2f0492-dde2-7e2f-98f4-b494ac6a3e7a@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd33f341-22de-1d78-6ee6-4da006f2b3a8@redhat.com>
On 28/03/2020 0:05, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 03/27/20 14:04, Liran Alon wrote:
>> On 27/03/2020 14:26, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> On 03/25/20 17:10, Liran Alon wrote:
>>>> + Packet->HostAdapterStatus =
>>>> + EFI_EXT_SCSI_STATUS_HOST_ADAPTER_DATA_OVERRUN_UNDERRUN;
>>>> + return EFI_BAD_BUFFER_SIZE;
>>> I think EFI_BAD_BUFFER_SIZE is invalid here. According to the UEFI spec,
>>> EFI_BAD_BUFFER_SIZE means "The SCSI Request Packet was not executed".
>>> But that's not the case here -- we do have a partially completed
>>> transfer.
>> Hmm... According to the documentation above EFI_SCSI_PASS_THRU_PASSTHRU
>> in MdePkg/Include/Protocol/ScsiPassThru.h:
>>
>> @retval EFI_BAD_BUFFER_SIZE The SCSI Request Packet was
>> executed, but the
>> entire DataBuffer could not be
>> transferred.
>> The actual number of bytes
>> transferred is returned
>> in TransferLength. See
>> HostAdapterStatus,
>> TargetStatus, SenseDataLength, and
>> SenseData in
>> that order for additional status
>> information.
>>
>> So I don't know who to believe... It does seem to me that this
>> documentation in the code makes more sense
>> and then my current code is correct. What do you think?
> You are looking at the wrong protocol header file.
Oops. You are right.
> The top of this
> header file bears the comment
>
> SCSI Pass Through protocol as defined in EFI 1.1.
>
> and the UEFI-2.8 spec does not define EFI_SCSI_PASS_THRU_PROTOCOL; it
> only refers to Mantis ticket 845
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mantis.uefi.org/mantis/view.php?id=845__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!M5o2BC3kQvh7gEgQh98Kb7YJeFCM_ajknF8iRXjDer3Ir8hUy6dHOReS12oCRvE$ > with subject
> "EFI_SCSI_PASS_THRU_PROTOCOL replacement".
>
> Instead, please consult EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_PASSTHRU in
> "MdePkg/Include/Protocol/ScsiPassThruExt.h". There, the
> EFI_BAD_BUFFER_SIZE return value conforms to the UEFI 2.8 spec ("The
> SCSI Request Packet was not executed").
Honestly, I'm not sure if this is not a bug in UEFI-2.8 spec and
ScsiPassThruExt.h header file. It doesn't make sense.
In the new header file, there is no way for PassThru() to indicate to
caller that a partial data-transfer have occurred.
Which seems to be a quite standard functionality. Almost all SCSI
devices are able to return information on partial data-transfer completions.
Looking at QEMU's virtio-scsi.c virtio_scsi_command_complete()
implementation, we can see how it handles partial data-transfer completions.
It sets Response->Response to VIRTIO_SCSI_S_OK and Response->Residual
accordingly.
Looking at EDK2 VirtioScsi driver, function ParseResponse(), this will
be handled by updating Packet->InTransferLength and
Packet->OutTransferLength based on Response->Residual,
but then setting Packet->HostAdapterStatus to
EFI_EXT_SCSI_STATUS_HOST_ADAPTER_OK and returning EFI_SUCCESS.
(In contrast to your suggestion for me to return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR in
this case).
The documentation of PassThru in ScsiPassThruExt.h for EFI_SUCCESS
specifies:
@retval EFI_SUCCESS The SCSI Request Packet was sent by the
host. For bi-directional
commands, InTransferLength bytes were
transferred from
InDataBuffer. For write and
bi-directional commands,
OutTransferLength bytes were transferred by
OutDataBuffer.
But it seems to reference the InTransferLength and OutTransferLength
*before* the call to PassThru().
In contrast to old header file, ScsiPassThru.h, which for
EFI_BAD_BUFFER_SIZE specifies explicitly:
@retval EFI_BAD_BUFFER_SIZE The SCSI Request Packet was
executed, but the
entire DataBuffer could not be
transferred.
The actual number of bytes
transferred is returned
in TransferLength. See
HostAdapterStatus,
TargetStatus, SenseDataLength, and
SenseData in
that order for additional status
information.
In addition, looking at EDK2 iSCSI ScsiPassThru driver
(NetworkPkg/IScsiDxe/IScsiExtScsiPassThru.c), one can see it use
EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_SCSI_REQUEST_PACKET
(Which matches the new header file ScsiPassThruExt.h and not the old
ScsiPassThru.h).
If you would have a look at how IScsiOnScsiRspRcvd() handles
SCSI_RSP_PDU_FLAG_BI_READ_OVERFLOW and SCSI_RSP_PDU_FLAG_OVERFLOW bits,
it seems to always
set Status to EFI_BAD_BUFFER_SIZE as I have done. After updating
Packet->InTransferLength / Packet->OutTransferLength.
What do you think? Do you have any further insights? This is quite
confusing to me.
-Liran
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-27 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-25 16:09 [PATCH v2 00/17] OvmfPkg: Support booting from VMware PVSCSI controller Liran Alon
2020-03-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Create empty driver Liran Alon
2020-03-26 14:44 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Install DriverBinding protocol Liran Alon
2020-03-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Report name of driver Liran Alon
2020-03-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Probe PCI devices and look for PvScsi Liran Alon
2020-03-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Install stubbed EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU Liran Alon
2020-03-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Report the number of targets and LUNs Liran Alon
2020-03-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Translate Target & LUN to/from DevicePath Liran Alon
2020-03-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Open PciIo protocol for later use Liran Alon
2020-03-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Backup/Restore PCI attributes on Init/UnInit Liran Alon
2020-03-26 17:04 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Enable MMIO-Space & Bus-Mastering in PCI attributes Liran Alon
2020-03-26 17:12 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-25 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Define device interface structures and constants Liran Alon
2020-03-26 17:19 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-25 16:10 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Reset adapter on init Liran Alon
2020-03-26 18:25 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-25 16:10 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Setup requests and completions rings Liran Alon
2020-03-26 20:51 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-25 16:10 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Introduce DMA communication buffer Liran Alon
2020-03-26 22:17 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-27 0:05 ` Liran Alon
2020-03-27 13:35 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-27 21:31 ` Liran Alon
2020-03-30 11:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-25 16:10 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Support sending SCSI request and receive response Liran Alon
2020-03-27 11:26 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-27 13:04 ` Liran Alon
2020-03-27 13:20 ` Liran Alon
2020-03-27 21:05 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-27 21:05 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-27 22:04 ` Liran Alon [this message]
2020-03-27 22:17 ` Liran Alon
2020-03-28 19:18 ` Liran Alon
2020-03-30 11:23 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-30 11:12 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-30 10:30 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-25 16:10 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Reset device on ExitBootServices() Liran Alon
2020-03-25 16:10 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] OvmfPkg/PvScsiDxe: Enable device 64-bit DMA addresses Liran Alon
2020-03-26 22:29 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc2f0492-dde2-7e2f-98f4-b494ac6a3e7a@oracle.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox