From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.31530.1583665964188713460 for ; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 04:12:44 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=B2H1fsrL; spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 207.211.31.120, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1583665963; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ga/+bZlTMWxgUqyE+2pjvbP4AuJkjq8+P6IW0rMH3Wk=; b=B2H1fsrLER83/t06uzeBH0aLkNadXIM/voFCAmpN0a249rtCwDYMs3Ea9VPZ9f3Ae4K05T nUBXGNQCgnbtZwf5vlHK5JFAcegr72hjIL0aPU8VsBUpn8nao682WDTrrESxw4UfcMYj+Z 5NP09Y5VWjD+fyJ5iV03I8aTCzp9DpU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-423-7_lfP0fLODyQ3734Aa-DOQ-1; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 07:12:39 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 7_lfP0fLODyQ3734Aa-DOQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED9F51005509; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 11:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-116-62.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.62]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E1360BF7; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 11:12:35 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] EDK II Maintainers - EDK II CI is now active on edk2/master To: devel@edk2.groups.io, michael.d.kinney@intel.com, Sean Brogan , Bret Barkelew , "Gao, Liming" References: From: "Laszlo Ersek" Cc: "Leif Lindholm (Nuvia address)" , Andrew Fish Message-ID: Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 12:12:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/12/19 03:55, Michael D Kinney wrote: > Please let us know if there are any questions about this > change in the development process. What is the recommended way to report issues with the mergify (not CI) infrastructure? Mergify hasn't been picking up ready-to-merge branches (with CI passed and the "push" label set). https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/427 https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/428 https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/430 I've filed a ticket with github (#592107) and emailed too. But, the github ticket number doesn't seem useful (there is not a "case" that I could overview, or share with others, using the ticket number), and mergify.io don't seem to have generated even a ticket number for me. Both github.com and mergify.io claim to have 100% service level at the moment: - https://www.githubstatus.com/ "All Systems Operational" - https://www.notion.so/Mergify-Status-Page-7803a762235d4ee6bed1f9976d17bd83 "Dashboard Operational", "Engine Operational" In the absence of github / mergify feedback, it would be nice if at least stewards could manually merge such topic branches that have passed CI. Thanks Laszlo