From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Fan, Jeff" <jeff.fan@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@ml01.01.org" <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>
Cc: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"Tian, Feng" <feng.tian@intel.com>,
"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Do not wakeup AP if only one processor supported
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:37:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce7067f9-f233-37bf-a4ab-09055b4e1cfd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <542CF652F8836A4AB8DBFAAD40ED192A4A2C568A@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 11/08/16 01:55, Fan, Jeff wrote:
> Laszlo,
>
> Oh. Sorry for the question mark in my last sentence and confusing you. :-) it should be point. It's my typo.
>
> MP PPI and the protocol DO exist even there is only one processor in the system.
>
> Thanks!
> Jeff
Thanks. With that guarantee, the proposed change looks sensible.
I didn't review the patch, but I want to confirm that (with the above
guarantee) I agree with its goal:
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Thanks
Laszlo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Laszlo Ersek
> Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 9:37 PM
> To: Fan, Jeff; edk2-devel@ml01.01.org
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D; Tian, Feng; Gao, Liming
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Do not wakeup AP if only one processor supported
>
> On 11/07/16 01:47, Fan, Jeff wrote:
>> Laszlo,
>>
>> Yes. MP PPI and Protocol still be installed even there is only one processor supported or found?
>
> I'm sorry -- are you confirming that the PPI and the protocol will exist, or are you asking if I would like them to exist?
>
> (I'm confused by the question mark at the end of your second sentence.)
>
> Thanks!
> Laszlo
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
>> Laszlo Ersek
>> Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2016 12:40 AM
>> To: Fan, Jeff; edk2-devel@ml01.01.org
>> Cc: Kinney, Michael D; Tian, Feng; Gao, Liming
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Do not wakeup AP if
>> only one processor supported
>>
>> On 11/04/16 09:18, Jeff Fan wrote:
>>> If MaxLogicalProcessorNumber is only 1, we needn't to wake up APs at
>>> all and needn't to register callback functions.
>>>
>>> It could improve boot performance on single supported system.
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204
>>>
>>> Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/DxeMpLib.c | 7 ++++++
>>> UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>> UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/PeiMpLib.c | 8 +++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> The MP services protocol and PPI that depend on this library will remain available to callers, right?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Laszlo
>>
>>> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/DxeMpLib.c
>>> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/DxeMpLib.c
>>> index b399f1c..eb36d6f 100644
>>> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/DxeMpLib.c
>>> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/DxeMpLib.c
>>> @@ -290,6 +290,13 @@ InitMpGlobalData (
>>>
>>> SaveCpuMpData (CpuMpData);
>>>
>>> + if (CpuMpData->CpuCount == 1) {
>>> + //
>>> + // If only BSP exists, return
>>> + //
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> //
>>> // Avoid APs access invalid buff data which allocated by BootServices,
>>> // so we will allocate reserved data for AP loop code.
>>> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
>>> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
>>> index 56b870e..a0edc55 100644
>>> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
>>> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
>>> @@ -1143,6 +1143,7 @@ MpInitLibInitialize (
>>> } else {
>>> MaxLogicalProcessorNumber = OldCpuMpData->CpuCount;
>>> }
>>> + ASSERT (MaxLogicalProcessorNumber != 0);
>>>
>>> AsmGetAddressMap (&AddressMap);
>>> ApResetVectorSize = AddressMap.RendezvousFunnelSize + sizeof
>>> (MP_CPU_EXCHANGE_INFO); @@ -1209,10 +1210,12 @@ MpInitLibInitialize (
>>> MtrrGetAllMtrrs (&CpuMpData->MtrrTable);
>>>
>>> if (OldCpuMpData == NULL) {
>>> - //
>>> - // Wakeup all APs and calculate the processor count in system
>>> - //
>>> - CollectProcessorCount (CpuMpData);
>>> + if (MaxLogicalProcessorNumber > 1) {
>>> + //
>>> + // Wakeup all APs and calculate the processor count in system
>>> + //
>>> + CollectProcessorCount (CpuMpData);
>>> + }
>>> } else {
>>> //
>>> // APs have been wakeup before, just get the CPU Information @@
>>> -1238,19 +1241,21 @@ MpInitLibInitialize (
>>> sizeof (CPU_VOLATILE_REGISTERS)
>>> );
>>> }
>>> - //
>>> - // Wakeup APs to do some AP initialize sync
>>> - //
>>> - WakeUpAP (CpuMpData, TRUE, 0, ApInitializeSync, CpuMpData);
>>> - //
>>> - // Wait for all APs finished initialization
>>> - //
>>> - while (CpuMpData->FinishedCount < (CpuMpData->CpuCount - 1)) {
>>> - CpuPause ();
>>> - }
>>> - CpuMpData->InitFlag = ApInitDone;
>>> - for (Index = 0; Index < CpuMpData->CpuCount; Index++) {
>>> - SetApState (&CpuMpData->CpuData[Index], CpuStateIdle);
>>> + if (MaxLogicalProcessorNumber > 1) {
>>> + //
>>> + // Wakeup APs to do some AP initialize sync
>>> + //
>>> + WakeUpAP (CpuMpData, TRUE, 0, ApInitializeSync, CpuMpData);
>>> + //
>>> + // Wait for all APs finished initialization
>>> + //
>>> + while (CpuMpData->FinishedCount < (CpuMpData->CpuCount - 1)) {
>>> + CpuPause ();
>>> + }
>>> + CpuMpData->InitFlag = ApInitDone;
>>> + for (Index = 0; Index < CpuMpData->CpuCount; Index++) {
>>> + SetApState (&CpuMpData->CpuData[Index], CpuStateIdle);
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/PeiMpLib.c
>>> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/PeiMpLib.c
>>> index e242d37..1f2fcb8 100644
>>> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/PeiMpLib.c
>>> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/PeiMpLib.c
>>> @@ -321,6 +321,14 @@ InitMpGlobalData (
>>> EFI_STATUS Status;
>>>
>>> SaveCpuMpData (CpuMpData);
>>> +
>>> + if (CpuMpData->CpuCount == 1) {
>>> + //
>>> + // If only BSP exists, return
>>> + //
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> //
>>> // Register an event for EndOfPei
>>> //
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> edk2-devel mailing list
>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-08 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-04 8:18 [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Do not wakeup AP if only one processor supported Jeff Fan
2016-11-04 16:40 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-11-07 0:47 ` Fan, Jeff
2016-11-07 13:37 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-11-08 0:55 ` Fan, Jeff
2016-11-08 13:37 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2016-11-09 7:21 ` Tian, Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ce7067f9-f233-37bf-a4ab-09055b4e1cfd@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox