Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 00/79] Fix a bunch of typos (part 1)

["Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>]

On 12/04/19 02:27, Gao, Liming wrote:
> You can also mention the fork branch with all changes. Then, the reviewer can see all changes. 

That's not good enough: people on the list that do not get a personal CC
of a given patch cannot comment on the patch *through the list*.

Laszlo

> Thanks
> Liming
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Desimone, Nathaniel L
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2019 9:16 AM
>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; philmd@redhat.com; Achin Gupta
>> <achin.gupta@arm.com>; Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>; Anthony Perard
>> <anthony.perard@citrix.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>;
>> Zhang, Chao B <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>; Chiu, Chasel
>> <chasel.chiu@intel.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Wu, Hao A
>> <hao.a.wu@intel.com>; Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Wu, Jiaxin
>> <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Justen, Jordan
>> L <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>; Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>; Laszlo Ersek
>> <lersek@redhat.com>; Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>; Gao, Liming
>> <liming.gao@intel.com>; Rabeda, Maciej <maciej.rabeda@intel.com>; Kinney,
>> Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Fu,
>> Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; Supreeth
>> Venkatesh <supreeth.venkatesh@arm.com>; Lu, XiaoyuX
>> <xiaoyux.lu@intel.com>; Gao, Zhichao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
>> Cc: Antoine Cœur <coeur@gmx.fr>
>> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 00/79] Fix a bunch of typos (part 1)
>>
>> Hi Philippe and Antoine,
>>
>> Thank you very much for doing this work!
>>
>> Please note that the mailing list currently has the braindead behavior only
>> allowing a user to send 40 emails in a 30 minute window. I believe this is done
>> to prevent spamming. Because of this, only patches 0-39 were actually
>> received. Myself and Michael recently ran into this same problem with the
>> Advanced Feature Refactor patch series. We worked around it by sending our
>> emails in batches and waiting 30 minutes between each batch.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nate