From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.15155.1586960410741462083 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 07:20:10 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.231, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jOitd-0000yI-4m; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 08:20:09 -0600 Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.69]) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jOitc-0006Ar-Gh; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 08:20:09 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428F312807FC; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 08:20:08 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta5.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta5.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id tDMN4cgllHr5; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 08:20:08 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00B3F12804FC; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 08:20:07 -0600 (MDT) To: Laszlo Ersek , devel@edk2.groups.io, Anthony Perard , Julien Grall , Ard Biesheuvel References: From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 08:20:06 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-XM-SPF: eid=1jOitc-0006Ar-Gh;;;mid=;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.69;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,TooManyTo_001,TooManyTo_002, TooManyTo_003,TooManyTo_004,XMGappySubj_01,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5014] * 0.5 TooManyTo_004 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 5x (uncommon) * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.5 TooManyTo_002 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 3x (uncommon) * 0.6 TooManyTo_003 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 4x (uncommon) * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.5 XMGappySubj_01 Very gappy subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **;Laszlo Ersek , devel@edk2.groups.io, Anthony Perard , Julien Grall , Ard Biesheuvel X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 401 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 12 (2.9%), b_tie_ro: 10 (2.5%), parse: 1.25 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 5 (1.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.22 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.2 (0.8%), tests_pri_-950: 1.56 (0.4%), tests_pri_-900: 1.22 (0.3%), tests_pri_-90: 83 (20.6%), check_bayes: 81 (20.2%), b_tokenize: 7 (1.8%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (1.4%), b_comp_prob: 1.76 (0.4%), b_tok_touch_all: 63 (15.8%), b_finish: 0.92 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 283 (70.5%), check_dkim_signature: 0.55 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 24 (6.1%), poll_dns_idle: 18 (4.5%), tests_pri_10: 2.3 (0.6%), tests_pri_500: 7 (1.7%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: OvmfPkg XenPkg: X64 DEBUG GCC5 -DDEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT=TRUE build is broken X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US On 4/15/2020 8:04 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > I figure you attempted the DEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT build because without it > you get no debug output at all (due to the default > PlatformDebugLibIoPort resolution, which produces no logs on Xen). I just attempted the DEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT build because that's how I do the other DEBUG OVMF builds and was running the following basic build script to make sure my bhyve changes weren't breaking things. build -p OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc -a X64 -t GCC5 -b RELEASE build -p OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc -a X64 -t GCC5 -b DEBUG -DDEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT=TRUE build -p OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc -a X64 -t GCC5 -b NOOPT build -p OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32.dsc -a IA32 -t GCC5 -b RELEASE build -p OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32.dsc -a IA32 -t GCC5 -b DEBUG -DDEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT=TRUE build -p OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32.dsc -a IA32 -t GCC5 -b NOOPT build -p OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc -a IA32 -a X64 -t GCC5 -b RELEASE build -p OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc -a IA32 -a X64 -t GCC5 -b DEBUG -DDEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT=TRUE build -p OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc -a IA32 -a X64 -t GCC5 -b NOOPT build -p OvmfPkg/OvmfXen.dsc -a X64 -t GCC5 -b RELEASE build -p OvmfPkg/OvmfXen.dsc -a X64 -t GCC5 -b DEBUG -DDEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT=TRUE build -p OvmfPkg/OvmfXen.dsc -a X64 -t GCC5 -b NOOPT build -p BhyvePkg/BhyvePkgX64.dsc -a X64 -t GCC5 -b RELEASE build -p BhyvePkg/BhyvePkgX64.dsc -a X64 -t GCC5 -b DEBUG -DDEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT=TRUE build -p BhyvePkg/BhyvePkgX64.dsc -a X64 -t GCC5 -b NOOPT -- Rebecca Cran