Re: 回复: 回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 00/13] BaseTools,CryptoPkg,MdePkg,OvmfPkg: Delete CLANG35,CLANG38,GCC48,GCC49, rename GCC5 to GCC, update CLANGDWARF, delete VS 2008-2013, EBC

["Rebecca Cran" <rebecca@bsdio.com>]

Okay. I'll rework the patch series to only delete GCC48 and keep GCC49 
and GCC5.


-- 

Rebecca Cran


On 4/3/23 7:31 PM, gaoliming wrote:
> Rebecca:
>    There are more discussion on GCC49 tool chain. So, I think it is the safe way to keep GCC49 and GCC5 now. We can make the changes for other tool chains first.
>
> Thanks
> Liming
>> -----邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com>
>> 发送时间: 2023年4月3日 5:51
>> 收件人: Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@gmail.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
>> 抄送: gaoliming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Oliver Smith-Denny
>> <osd@smith-denny.com>; Guomin Jiang <guomin.jiang@intel.com>; Xiaoyu
>> Lu <xiaoyu1.lu@intel.com>; Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Jiewen Yao
>> <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>;
>> Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>; Gerd Hoffmann
>> <kraxel@redhat.com>; Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>; Andrew Fish
>> <afish@apple.com>; Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>; Michael D
>> Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>> 主题: Re: 回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 00/13]
>> BaseTools,CryptoPkg,MdePkg,OvmfPkg: Delete
>> CLANG35,CLANG38,GCC48,GCC49, rename GCC5 to GCC, update
>> CLANGDWARF, delete VS 2008-2013, EBC
>>
>> On 4/2/23 12:38 PM, Pedro Falcato wrote:
>>> As expressed off-list on UEFI talkbox, I like GCCNOLTO, but I would
>>> rather keep GCC5 as GCC5, for the next future iteration of "lets bump
>>> a new toolchain because we need feature X".
>> Given we've gone from GCC 5 through 12 with no new toolchains, I'd
>> prefer to just have GCC.
>>
>>> This is unsurprising, plenty of NOLTO build breakage. Since no one
>>> seems to use this, could we think about axing this or?
>>>
>>> Just seems silly to have an extra toolchain (with extra cognitive
>>> overhead for anyone looking at tools_def) for s/-flto//g
>> Since Liming wants to keep it, let's make all the other changes
>> (deleting VS 2008-2013, CLANG35, CLANG38 etc.) and keep GCCNOLTO and
>> GCC
>> for now. If nobody fixes the problems with GCCNOLTO, maybe we can
>> revisit dropping it in a few months?
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Rebecca Cran
>
>