From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.105486.1680623366312728471 for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 08:49:26 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=fail reason="signature has expired" header.i=@bsdio.com header.s=fm3 header.b=eMFa/FaF; spf=pass (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 64.147.123.24, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77EAA320095E; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 11:49:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Apr 2023 11:49:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdio.com; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1680623364; x=1680709764; bh=04nx9QFh2O1PsYjVNl7124X+KS62dUzEJdj OHUImqbg=; b=eMFa/FaFRcECgIm8ihdOpLr2HVA4VSCaozUnGgSpZSgEJm2P4kj ex7T60cutNQiXMBiukJGszMfAtSmpwt5AUH1KeL4YJXZq1BkH6O0vX5/Qhb/7KQP pqgvZNqi7kKpkspWbperSDvsO0wgQcWmfmvyCNANksM7ZbNNcEFOqJnoVSB3o0TM Ik7/uYECF768S2uPzoiGXEAuXLG88sVet2m34wsKFJDM+dEengxQ2BqoPjRTKWe7 j8W00l4y9hM8oLDzq4QnRTU40EtoJhciuWd4/DWA+AFuZg1ayOVM22ezQ4QVo/DE KHbNpUbFoKDEq2IFZzUa8Gt2/Nve+o0QQXA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1680623364; x=1680709764; bh=04nx9QFh2O1PsYjVNl7124X+KS62dUzEJdj OHUImqbg=; b=R5l76jtuQ4/AZfjsNCMRBUSLTvJOaeBT+iTUhYgK+uu05LEtXuN gRX2/FAwqoWf2PvfZSPdo+j+BlNOfCe7bGayIiA63PhzyyXT49xwQCk31lGmRMlf 1NoVOLsCvvp1dmDRrYpXq3vm6GqTVWfOlFulejq/NslHliJX7G4OPQiIVLGuWu8g i/dr0KUWzWWRk8mDU42khbeufI1eN9jTa0Hym5RMyuN3o2syWAnpVCfj0wV/WixU xJboi6qTgR0UTWcWkfRdHIQ3xhU+0PWWD6uGngxhTcPouINqoYiChlbmJC1RUGRD rb1UIaIozqXU9YYGMuBqNOoQAPcc4EcYq4A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdeiledgleegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvggs vggttggrucevrhgrnhcuoehrvggsvggttggrsegsshguihhordgtohhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeegfeegveduheejgfduffefhfehleehiefghfetvdejvdelhfeukefhhfdv geehveenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hrvggsvggttggrsegsshguihhordgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i5b994698:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 11:49:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 09:49:20 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.1 Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOWbnuWkjTog5Zue5aSNOiBbZWRrMi1kZXZlbF0gW1BBVENIIHYyIDAwLzEzXSBCYXNlVG9vbHMsQ3J5cHRvUGtnLE1kZVBrZyxPdm1mUGtnOiBEZWxldGUgQ0xBTkczNSxDTEFORzM4LEdDQzQ4LEdDQzQ5LCByZW5hbWUgR0NDNSB0byBHQ0MsIHVwZGF0ZSBDTEFOR0RXQVJGLCBkZWxldGUgVlMgMjAwOC0yMDEzLCBFQkM=?= To: gaoliming , 'Pedro Falcato' , devel@edk2.groups.io Cc: 'Oliver Smith-Denny' , 'Guomin Jiang' , 'Xiaoyu Lu' , 'Jian J Wang' , 'Jiewen Yao' , 'Ard Biesheuvel' , 'Jordan Justen' , 'Gerd Hoffmann' , 'Bob Feng' , 'Andrew Fish' , 'Leif Lindholm' , 'Michael D Kinney' References: <20230328173111.759017-1-rebecca@bsdio.com> <02fb01d961dc$88d6acd0$9a840670$@byosoft.com.cn> <92a85636-3875-fd4d-06ff-dab9670370a5@bsdio.com> <000201d96695$331dede0$9959c9a0$@byosoft.com.cn> From: "Rebecca Cran" In-Reply-To: <000201d96695$331dede0$9959c9a0$@byosoft.com.cn> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Okay. I'll rework the patch series to only delete GCC48 and keep GCC49 and GCC5. -- Rebecca Cran On 4/3/23 7:31 PM, gaoliming wrote: > Rebecca: > There are more discussion on GCC49 tool chain. So, I think it is the safe way to keep GCC49 and GCC5 now. We can make the changes for other tool chains first. > > Thanks > Liming >> -----邮件原件----- >> 发件人: Rebecca Cran >> 发送时间: 2023年4月3日 5:51 >> 收件人: Pedro Falcato ; devel@edk2.groups.io >> 抄送: gaoliming ; Oliver Smith-Denny >> ; Guomin Jiang ; Xiaoyu >> Lu ; Jian J Wang ; Jiewen Yao >> ; Ard Biesheuvel ; >> Jordan Justen ; Gerd Hoffmann >> ; Bob Feng ; Andrew Fish >> ; Leif Lindholm ; Michael D >> Kinney >> 主题: Re: 回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 00/13] >> BaseTools,CryptoPkg,MdePkg,OvmfPkg: Delete >> CLANG35,CLANG38,GCC48,GCC49, rename GCC5 to GCC, update >> CLANGDWARF, delete VS 2008-2013, EBC >> >> On 4/2/23 12:38 PM, Pedro Falcato wrote: >>> As expressed off-list on UEFI talkbox, I like GCCNOLTO, but I would >>> rather keep GCC5 as GCC5, for the next future iteration of "lets bump >>> a new toolchain because we need feature X". >> Given we've gone from GCC 5 through 12 with no new toolchains, I'd >> prefer to just have GCC. >> >>> This is unsurprising, plenty of NOLTO build breakage. Since no one >>> seems to use this, could we think about axing this or? >>> >>> Just seems silly to have an extra toolchain (with extra cognitive >>> overhead for anyone looking at tools_def) for s/-flto//g >> Since Liming wants to keep it, let's make all the other changes >> (deleting VS 2008-2013, CLANG35, CLANG38 etc.) and keep GCCNOLTO and >> GCC >> for now. If nobody fixes the problems with GCCNOLTO, maybe we can >> revisit dropping it in a few months? >> >> >> -- >> >> Rebecca Cran > >