From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: "Zimmer, Vincent" <vincent.zimmer@intel.com>,
"Wolman, Ayellet" <ayellet.wolman@intel.com>,
"Cetola, Stephano" <stephano.cetola@intel.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposal to split Pkgs
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:28:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d371cda6-7290-c94a-78b6-5f66803dacb9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BFFB5BF@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 01/29/19 14:13, Ni, Ray wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Laszlo
>> Ersek
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 7:12 PM
>> To: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> Cc: Zimmer, Vincent <vincent.zimmer@intel.com>; Wolman, Ayellet
>> <ayellet.wolman@intel.com>; Cetola, Stephano <stephano.cetola@intel.com>;
>> Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [RFC] Proposal to split Pkgs
>> Regarding the benefits, I agree that we need clearer / finer grained assignments
>> between modules / packages and maintainers. I'm unsure if that really requires
>> reorganizing the tree (we could just reorganize Maintainers.txt instead -- add
>> some pathname patterns), but I agree that reorganizing the tree is one method
>> that could work.
> I agree adding more information in Maintainers.txt works as well.
> Thanks for providing the "pathname pattern" idea.
> I may do that in parallel to find more maintainers for MdeModulePkg.
> Do you agree to have more than 2 maintainers for MdeModulePkg?
I certainly do; I think we should assign maintainers under MdeModulePkg
on a module (library instance, driver) basis.
Thanks,
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-29 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-29 5:59 [RFC] Proposal to split Pkgs Ni, Ray
2019-01-29 11:11 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-01-29 11:39 ` Leif Lindholm
2019-01-29 13:13 ` Ni, Ray
2019-01-29 13:28 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-01-29 14:21 ` Leif Lindholm
2019-01-31 7:12 ` Ni, Ray
2019-01-31 7:51 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-31 8:02 ` Ni, Ray
2019-01-31 13:09 ` Andrew Fish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d371cda6-7290-c94a-78b6-5f66803dacb9@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox