From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 406F4211B5A34 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 05:28:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFB6A36887; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-121-45.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.121.45]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB4F5D73F; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:28:01 +0000 (UTC) To: "Ni, Ray" , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" Cc: "Zimmer, Vincent" , "Wolman, Ayellet" , "Cetola, Stephano" , "Kinney, Michael D" References: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BFF82D7@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BFFB5BF@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:28:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BFFB5BF@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposal to split Pkgs X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:28:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/29/19 14:13, Ni, Ray wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Laszlo >> Ersek >> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 7:12 PM >> To: Ni, Ray ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org >> Cc: Zimmer, Vincent ; Wolman, Ayellet >> ; Cetola, Stephano ; >> Kinney, Michael D >> Subject: Re: [edk2] [RFC] Proposal to split Pkgs >> Regarding the benefits, I agree that we need clearer / finer grained assignments >> between modules / packages and maintainers. I'm unsure if that really requires >> reorganizing the tree (we could just reorganize Maintainers.txt instead -- add >> some pathname patterns), but I agree that reorganizing the tree is one method >> that could work. > I agree adding more information in Maintainers.txt works as well. > Thanks for providing the "pathname pattern" idea. > I may do that in parallel to find more maintainers for MdeModulePkg. > Do you agree to have more than 2 maintainers for MdeModulePkg? I certainly do; I think we should assign maintainers under MdeModulePkg on a module (library instance, driver) basis. Thanks, Laszlo