From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com (out02.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.232]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web09.1552.1630113374599288171 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 18:16:14 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=NceiiqTp; spf=none, err=SPF record not found (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.232, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Tn+jSkWP+KaP8VtTssjiFK/7IgCpi7JOS/oxbrHaSDk=; b=NceiiqTp7mcWmfyu91CtB5uyeF 0pr7SdWSSzwoaWuIa1Kb+Wl4pD30S8EaosRDHKvaFriS1zNDA+V10+BmSd6XF/sNrWV1MNBeO/QKd eC75EtjZs3vlOFqJiXdoqeV0W3aPZumP19MwBrna5WsqWfjRI0fTz7yGduAL9df3u2LE=; Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]:38476) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mJmx4-00HPVX-Ca; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 19:16:06 -0600 Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.69]:33472) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mJmx2-00Fg6u-IP; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 19:16:05 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488951281116; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 19:16:04 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta5.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta5.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ATgIR-S5XorC; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 19:16:04 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.113] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF53E1280FC0; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 19:16:03 -0600 (MDT) To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: edk2-devel-groups-io , Bob Feng , Liming Gao , Yuwei Chen , Sean Brogan , Sami Mujawar , Leif Lindholm , Ard Biesheuvel References: <169DD8C33F04384D.18298@groups.io> <4be6fd6e-b468-d00e-3665-fb94d169633d@bsdio.com> From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 01:16:02 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-XM-SPF: eid=1mJmx2-00Fg6u-IP;;;mid=;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.69;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=none X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa01.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,NICE_REPLY_A,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01, XMNoVowels,XMSubLong,XM_B_Unicode autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.0 XM_B_Unicode BODY: Testing for specific types of unicode * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa01 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * -0.4 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa01 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;Ard Biesheuvel X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 1328 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 4.5 (0.3%), b_tie_ro: 3.0 (0.2%), parse: 1.40 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 15 (1.1%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.32 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 4.4 (0.3%), tests_pri_-950: 0.95 (0.1%), tests_pri_-900: 0.79 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 161 (12.1%), check_bayes: 147 (11.1%), b_tokenize: 6 (0.4%), b_tok_get_all: 8 (0.6%), b_comp_prob: 2.1 (0.2%), b_tok_touch_all: 129 (9.7%), b_finish: 0.78 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 296 (22.3%), check_dkim_signature: 0.43 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 38 (2.9%), poll_dns_idle: 856 (64.5%), tests_pri_10: 2.8 (0.2%), tests_pri_500: 839 (63.2%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/2] BaseTools: Switch ARM/AARCH64 CI gcc from Linaro to Arm X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US On 8/27/2021 1:31 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 at 23:03, Rebecca Cran wrote: >> I've created a ticket in Bugzilla: >> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3594. >> >> >> -- >> Rebecca Cran >> >> >> On 8/22/21 11:35 PM, Rebecca Cran wrote: >>> Linaro no longer do gcc releases - Arm creates them now. >>> >>> Update the gcc_[arm,aarch64]_linux_ext_dep.yaml files in BaseTools/Bin to >>> switch from Linaro's old release to the latest gcc 10.3-2021.07 release >>> from Arm. >>> >>> The private PR https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1909 failed due to >>> a problem with GCC5_[ARM,AARCH64]_PREFIX. I don't know if there are more >>> changes I need to add, or if it's a problem with the CI system. >>> > > You are changing the compiler from > > arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc > > to > > arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcc > > (and likewise for aarch64) so I am not surprised you are hitting problems. Ah, I see why that's a problem now. The path is constructed in BaseTools/Plugin/LinuxGcc5ToolChain/LinuxGcc5ToolChain.py:             # make GCC5_ARM_PREFIX to align with tools_def.txt             prefix = os.path.join(install_path, "bin", "arm-linux-gnueabihf-") shell_environment.GetEnvironment().set_shell_var("GCC5_ARM_PREFIX", prefix) That explains why it worked on my machine where GCC5_ARM_PREFIX and GCC5_AARCH64_PREFIX are already set. -- Rebecca Cran