From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f66.google.com (mail-wm1-f66.google.com [209.85.128.66]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.52036.1585579834540416389 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 07:50:35 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@akeo-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=x/TvsJzS; spf=none, err=permanent DNS error (domain: akeo.ie, ip: 209.85.128.66, mailfrom: pete@akeo.ie) Received: by mail-wm1-f66.google.com with SMTP id r16so2402469wmg.5 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 07:50:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akeo-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=w6pGkhffvHo1hAnxUkWRsn/Lte2p7k7XZJoqG4PQHbw=; b=x/TvsJzShzUqkYmqwU5Fs7MDrZCKCBj7Ae+OP85UL99q88ysy9ZSIllEDbeDEXgg/Q 9ch3j2iqmBq0kQy6rnxrOEAlF2EA5FxTtX9NTDN35+jq7YfJN7hCz1lAUk9kCt/cNVMI wwL/8IRRX371MhomZ602vF4WwWa5aWMeW57tmERKuRBJi5oVCIPT6cHTalxpR4e2JXrn aH2J3smgEAnGhwHasb3r1WaEbBeWreCSMRfHiQqurLlf7Ne8Bg52Q6cT6NDUJtQ8xulQ Zo8MWxDYBTzjmxMM1dc9s/OfInZZzlep8vKsO9Ut9ZFpQn6EYr7N+/lVCXebuFIYyB2Y uoHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=w6pGkhffvHo1hAnxUkWRsn/Lte2p7k7XZJoqG4PQHbw=; b=UhU8BKjBzTNlYLrY/AZmS5YrOHyAGHMLZA2+JRgTQfsO9XyaisDGri4NQYGJhoWAH7 eNJpZCfKDsJa3X3dRMFLA9Z41aIdz+EN4sx6+CN1Mz6n9JFUAxcLFbxrxQHPyj01BvYT 8BAzwK2rhX0HnpmsajszBLBFSJkIuOhwUf5KA4r+JG4kFKlsNp7SoiOQP2/62GyF+4zJ YtJPm56Qi3u/tUa86YlLmC4Z46X9rjVb89Gv5KoQmq4Vg2tB8DgU+DK3WqS41g5cidSS QoPl5FrFEfMWr6OB/qTE8wjE6l7+1Id2H+wmDVXG21Ye/jku4Ed0CIWCvrBPBtFPAo4a MSJA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1CmmxHmF1qgEIvpqp0xRzdQHXp9WVp2pCiybtqgPIf4eESdBTl s0JcF4pnqN2aqvnAwjB+D02sZg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvpCyQbNczB4hmiCPdoZ4g4+bZjQ576zIFUtoqeDew9+f0dRIs3H4KWZHEIZJbm0104LL/n2w== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:e3c2:: with SMTP id a185mr12869508wmh.64.1585579833094; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 07:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [10.0.0.122] ([84.203.45.232]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v8sm22188103wrp.84.2020.03.30.07.50.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 07:50:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] EmbeddedPkg/AcpiLib: add GICC table init macro for ACPI 6.3 To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: edk2-devel-groups-io , Leif Lindholm References: <20200327130117.11304-1-pete@akeo.ie> <6fb85ee0-1894-8a6b-73d0-2a7adc0799ab@akeo.ie> <20ba12ef-ae50-d40e-cc98-14482aafa486@akeo.ie> <413d1143-a4da-198a-841e-a4e96c3fd63e@akeo.ie> From: "Pete Batard" Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:50:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2020.03.30 15:42, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 16:39, Pete Batard wrote: >> >> On 2020.03.30 15:34, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> > ... >>> Again, I am happy to merge this patch. The argument is about whether >>> we need to upgrade RPi4 to 6.3 >>> >> >> Last time I checked, quite a few of the people who contributed code to >> the platform were of the opinion that we did. >> > > Then they are cordially invited to argue their position, preferably > using arguments. > >> I will re-send an e-mail to the group, off-list, so that you get an idea >> of what the current stance is on that topic, and then decide whether >> your want to uphold your current position. >> > > Sure. I'd prefer on-list to be honest, but if you feel it needs to be > off-list, that is also fine. > I personally wouldn't mind on-list, but I'm not sure I want to catapult all the members of the ad-hoc group we gathered off-list into a sudden public discussion. At any rate, provided that you happen to change your position, I'd expect other people who agree with your current view to chime in on-list, if they strongly disagree with a proposal that upgrades the platform to ACPI 6.3, and then we can discuss further. Regards, /Pete