From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.ksingh@gmail.com>
Cc: jordan.l.justen@intel.com, edk2-devel@ml01.01.org,
Leo Duran <leo.duran@amd.com>,
brijesh.singh@amd.com, Tom Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/5] OvmfPkg/MemcryptSevLib: Add SEV helper library
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:40:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6ec6683-8c20-f874-dda0-500426510dbb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+HCGMaFREiwVM=6GRNpHEzr9a+527rUVQPi1BcqbsquHcsEdQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/07/17 23:36, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com
> <mailto:lersek@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> On 03/07/17 20:14, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com
> <mailto:lersek@redhat.com>> wrote:
> I think SevActive() and SevInitialize() should become part of
> PlatformPei only (if that's possible).
>
> The upcoming PTE massaging functions could become part of the DMA lib
> stuff that you mention (as functions with external linkage), and then
> you could pull the DMA lib into QemuVideoDxe just to make these
> functions available.
>
> Presently the suggested functions don't seem to justify two (or even
> one) new libclass.
>
>
>
> I think I should be able to accomate SevInitialize() and SevActive()
> function inside the PlatformPei. I will drop MemcryptSevLib library in
> next rev.
>
> I will go with your idea for adding PTE massaging function directly
> inside the DMA library and will link that into QemuVideoDxe.
>
> Only part which I have not yet figured out, how to deal with Qemu
> FW_CFG DMA support, I believe some of FW_CFG DMA read and write
> happens fairly early (PEI stage).
That's right, off the top of my head, minimally PlatformPei uses fw_cfg
heavily during PEI.
> The PTE massaging code may need to
> allocate memory and not sure how to allocate dynamic memory in early stages.
> Any pointers ?
You can use MemoryAllocationLib functions for that (such as
AllocatePool() and AllocatePages()). The OVMF DSC files resolve the lib
class for the PEI phase like this:
MemoryAllocationLib|MdePkg/Library/PeiMemoryAllocationLib/PeiMemoryAllocationLib.inf
and the PeiMemoryAllocationLib instance maps those functions to the PEI
services.
A few important things about this:
- AllocatePool() works up to only ~64KB in size, and the allocation is
backed by a new HOB. Generally speaking, the HOB may be moved to a
different spot in memory before entering the DXE phase, so pointers
returned by such AllocatePool() calls (in PEI) are not safe to
dereference in the DXE phase.
- FreePool() does nothing, the allocated memory (the HOB, see above) is
only released when the guest OS starts (and it drops all boot services
data type memory).
- AllocatePages() works as it says on the tin, and the pointer returned
by it is safe to dereference in DXE.
- FreePages() however is again a no-op, it practically leaks the memory,
and only the guest OS will be able to release it (see FreePool() above).
One workaround for this could be to stash the address of the PEI-phase
allocation in a GUID HOB or a PCD, and then let some DXE driver in the
DXE phase release the memory with gBS->FreePages(). I'm not sure though
if this complexity is worth it.
- Note that it is PlatformPei itself that installs the permanent PEI
RAM. Before that happens, PEIMs (including PlatformPei itself) can only
allocate memory from the temporary SEC/PEI heap, which is very very
small, and only AllocatePool() would work at that point (AllocatePages()
wouldn't). However, if you place the AllocatePages() function call after
PublishPeiMemory(), then things should work.
As far as I can see, you added MemcryptSevInitialize() to the end of
InitializePlatform(); allocating pages at that point should be fine.
- During S3 resume, a different (pre-reserved) memory area is used as
permanent PEI RAM, which is quite smaller than the one used during
normal boot. It means that, if you need a lot of memory for setting up
SEV during S3 resume, AllocatePages() might run out of memory, and we
might have to resize the pre-reservation mentioned above.
- If you could reasonably bound the allocation size with a constant, it
might be simplest to use static arrays / variables. Those would be
dropped as soon as the PEI phase was exited. As one quirk however, you
should not rely on such variables being zero-initialized during S3 resume.
Thanks
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-08 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-06 23:27 [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
2017-03-06 23:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/5] OvmfPkg/ResetVector: Set memory encryption when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <3ec1cf2d-952d-97fa-108d-a6c70e613277@amd.com>
2017-03-07 16:34 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 16:35 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-08 18:38 ` Jordan Justen
2017-03-08 18:42 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-06 23:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/5] OvmfPkg/MemcryptSevLib: Add SEV helper library Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 17:06 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-07 19:14 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 22:08 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-07 22:36 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-08 8:40 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2017-03-17 2:02 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-17 10:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-17 14:08 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-08 14:56 ` Duran, Leo
2017-03-08 15:19 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-06 23:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/5] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: Initialize SEV support Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 17:08 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-07 19:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-06 23:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/5] OvmfPkg/BaseIoLibIntrinsic: import BaseIoLibIntrinsic package Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 17:20 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-07 20:06 ` Jordan Justen
2017-03-07 22:18 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-08 15:41 ` Gao, Liming
2017-03-08 16:26 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-09 1:43 ` Gao, Liming
2017-03-08 18:58 ` Jordan Justen
2017-03-09 1:48 ` Gao, Liming
2017-03-09 15:36 ` Duran, Leo
2017-03-09 16:36 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-06 23:28 ` [RFC PATCH v1 5/5] OvmfPkg/BaseIoLibIntrinsic: Unroll String I/O when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <5a66f334-27e1-3b49-150e-c01209ecb2f6@amd.com>
2017-03-07 18:43 ` Brijesh Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d6ec6683-8c20-f874-dda0-500426510dbb@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox