public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: jejb@linux.ibm.com, devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: dovmurik@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Dov.Murik1@il.ibm.com,
	ashish.kalra@amd.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com, tobin@ibm.com,
	david.kaplan@amd.com, jon.grimm@amd.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
	frankeh@us.ibm.com,
	"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] OvmfPkg/AmdSev: add Grub Firmware Volume Package
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:58:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7ac7744-e369-3047-4f58-676d13b5a4e0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b7899fa-fa52-7652-2d2a-d4ec67ece34d@redhat.com>

On 11/24/20 15:54, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 11/24/20 09:23, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 11/24/20 07:38, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 22:08 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>
>>>> In [a](5) I requested the removal of everything in this INF file that
>>>> was not required for the desired semantics (i.e., for unconditionally
>>>> booting the builtin GRUB binary).
>>>>
>>>> So again I'm unsure if you missed my feedback, or thought it was not
>>>> important. (I didn't get a request for clarification either.)
>>>>  
>>>> Keeping INF files minimal is relevant for future contributions. We
>>>> frequently need to determine the set of modules that depend on a
>>>> particular PCD. If some INF files list PCDs unjustifiedly, then the
>>>> affected module set may appear larger than it really is.
>>>>
>>>> This applies to all sections of the INF file, not just [Pcd].
>>>
>>> I did try stripping quite a lot, but then it wouldn't boot.  It seems
>>> that the PCI devices are needed for grub to find the encrypted volume,
>>> so I put most of it back again.  Is there some way of identifying
>>> superfluous pieces so I can detect if I put too much back?
>>
>> I suggest proceeding element by element in the INF file (and matching
>> that, in the header / C files) -- remove one element per patch. Then you
>> can either build+test it as you go, or create a series of micro-patches
>> up-front, and if it doesn't boot, bisect it. Finally, squash the
>> removals that are justifiable into this patch (for posting), and drop
>> the rest.
>>
>> It's unfortunately trial and error to some extent; however, given that
>> each step removes 1 element (PCD, Protocol, GUID, lib class, and finally
>> Package), and the number of elements summed over the INF file sections
>> is finite, this process is guaranteed to terminate.
> 
> Looking briefly over the file "OvmfPkg/Library/PlatformBootManagerLibGrub/PlatformBootManagerLibGrub.inf", I suggest removing:
> 
> - [Packages]: whatever proves unnecessary in the end,
> 
> - [LibraryClasses]: ditto,

Perhaps I can make that recommendation / request more detailed too:


* drop:

- UefiRuntimeServicesTableLib: no use of "gRT"

- ReportStatusCodeLib: commit 0a0566d5edad is not relevant, because we justifiedly removed TryRunningQemuKernel()

- XenPlatformLib: as discussed before; substitute FALSE for each XenDetected() call, and compress the resultant code


* keep:

- BaseLib: for CpuDeadLoop()

- MemoryAllocationLib: for FreePool()

- UefiBootServicesTableLib: for gBS->xxx()

- BaseMemoryLib: for CompareMem()

- DebugLib: for DEBUG() and ASSERT()

- PcdLib: for PcdGet16 (PcdOvmfHostBridgePciDevId)

- UefiBootManagerLib: for APIs central to the functionality of PlatformBootManagerLibGrub

- BootLogoLib: for BootLogoEnableLogo()

- DevicePathLib: for a bunch of device path manipulation

- PciLib: mainly for the functions called in PciAcpiInitialization()

- UefiLib: for EfiEventGroupSignal() etc

- PlatformBmPrintScLib: for PlatformBmPrintScRegisterHandler() -- this is responsible for printing the boot option processing steps to the UEFI console

- Tcg2PhysicalPresenceLib: for Tcg2PhysicalPresenceLibProcessRequest() -- we preserve TPM support


Then leaving the trimming of [Packages] to the end makes sense -- after trimming everything else, try to remove each package DEC in isolation, and see if the lib instance continues to build.

Thanks!
Laszlo



> 
> - [Pcd]: PcdOvmfFlashVariablesEnable, PcdPlatformBootTimeOut,
> 
> - [Pcd]: PcdUartDefaultBaudRate, PcdUartDefaultDataBits, PcdUartDefaultParity, PcdUartDefaultStopBits; together with "gXenConsoleDevicePath", "gXenPlatformConsole", XenDetected() / XenPlatformLib,
> 
> - [Pcd.IA32, Pcd.X64]: PcdFSBClock,
> 
> - [Protocols]: gEfiDecompressProtocolGuid, gEfiS3SaveStateProtocolGuid,
> 
> - [Guids]: gEfiGlobalVariableGuid,
> 
> Keep these:
> 
> - [Protocols]: gEfiPciRootBridgeIoProtocolGuid, gEfiDxeSmmReadyToLockProtocolGuid, gEfiLoadedImageProtocolGuid, gEfiFirmwareVolume2ProtocolGuid,
> 
> - [Guids]: gEfiEndOfDxeEventGroupGuid, gRootBridgesConnectedEventGroupGuid, gUefiShellFileGuid, gGrubFileGuid.
> 
> Thanks!
> Laszlo
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-24 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-20 18:45 [PATCH v2 0/6] SEV Encrypted Boot for Ovmf James Bottomley
2020-11-20 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] OvmfPkg/Amdsev: Base commit to build encrypted boot specific OVMF James Bottomley
2020-11-23 18:01   ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-11-23 23:25     ` James Bottomley
2020-11-23 23:43       ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-11-20 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] OvmfPkg/AmdSev: add Grub Firmware Volume Package James Bottomley
2020-11-23 21:08   ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-11-24  6:38     ` James Bottomley
2020-11-24  8:23       ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-11-24 14:54         ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-11-24 15:58           ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-11-24 16:22             ` [edk2-devel] " James Bottomley
2020-11-24 23:22               ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-11-24 23:42                 ` James Bottomley
2020-11-25  1:27                   ` James Bottomley
2020-11-25 14:01                     ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-11-25 16:02                       ` James Bottomley
2020-11-25 17:09                         ` James Bottomley
2020-11-25 18:17                           ` James Bottomley
2020-11-25 19:20                             ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-11-25 20:11                               ` James Bottomley
2020-11-25 18:35                           ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-11-25 19:08                             ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-11-25 19:14                               ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-11-20 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] OvmfPkg: convert ES Reset Block structure to be guided James Bottomley
2020-11-23 22:16   ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-11-24 14:57     ` Lendacky, Thomas
2020-11-24 19:07       ` James Bottomley
2020-11-24 23:19         ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-11-24 19:05     ` James Bottomley
2020-11-24 23:15       ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-11-20 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] OvmfPkg: create a SEV secret area in the AmdSev memfd James Bottomley
2020-11-23 22:28   ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-11-20 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] OvmfPkg/AmdSev: assign and protect the Sev Secret area James Bottomley
2020-11-23 22:38   ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-11-20 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] OvmfPkg/AmdSev: Expose the Sev Secret area using a configuration table James Bottomley
2020-11-23 22:56   ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d7ac7744-e369-3047-4f58-676d13b5a4e0@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox