From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, philmd@redhat.com
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] SecurityPkg: Fix incorrect return value in documentation
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 00:28:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <da4893ce-89bf-d0de-a3e9-61aac8ce31e6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200204222624.7478-1-philmd@redhat.com>
Hi Phil,
On 02/04/20 23:26, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> The DxeTpmMeasureBootHandler and DxeTpm2MeasureBootHandler handlers
> are SECURITY2_FILE_AUTHENTICATION_HANDLER prototype. This prototype
> can not return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER.
>
> The prototype documentation states it returns EFI_ACCESS_DENIED if:
>
> "The file specified by File and FileBuffer did not authenticate,
> and the platform policy dictates that the DXE Foundation may not
> use File."
>
> Note in practice both functions return EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION:
>
> "The file specified by DevicePath and FileBuffer did not
> authenticate, and the platform policy dictates that the file
> should be placed in the untrusted state. The image has been
> added to the file execution table."
>
> Noticed while reviewing commit 6d57592740cdd0b6868baeef7929d6e6fef.
>
> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
> .../Library/DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib/DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib.c | 2 +-
> SecurityPkg/Library/DxeTpmMeasureBootLib/DxeTpmMeasureBootLib.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/SecurityPkg/Library/DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib/DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib.c b/SecurityPkg/Library/DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib/DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib.c
> index 04b9b0d7fbf3..0c07f65c6835 100644
> --- a/SecurityPkg/Library/DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib/DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib.c
> +++ b/SecurityPkg/Library/DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib/DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib.c
> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ Finish:
> and other exception operations. The File parameter allows for possible logging
> within the SAP of the driver.
>
> - If File is NULL, then EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER is returned.
> + If File is NULL, then EFI_ACCESS_DENIED is returned.
>
> If the file specified by File with an authentication status specified by
> AuthenticationStatus is safe for the DXE Core to use, then EFI_SUCCESS is returned.
I've tried seeing where this code actually returns
EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER, but I can't find it. If File is NULL in
DxeTpm2MeasureBootHandler(), then first we seem to do:
OrigDevicePathNode = DuplicateDevicePath (File);
which I believe will produce a NULL. Then we seem to pass this NULL
around a little bit, so I think there's a fair chance of crashing there.
I wonder if this code should be fixed, to check "File" in the first
place, and then return EFI_ACCESS_DENIED.
There are also some other places in the function that could apparently
return a wide array of error codes -- FvbProtocol->GetPhysicalAddress()
(EFI_UNSUPPORTED?), PeCoffLoaderGetImageInfo(), etc.
I do agree this patch is an improvement, however; at least it says what
*should* be returned. So with that in mind:
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Thanks
Laszlo
> diff --git a/SecurityPkg/Library/DxeTpmMeasureBootLib/DxeTpmMeasureBootLib.c b/SecurityPkg/Library/DxeTpmMeasureBootLib/DxeTpmMeasureBootLib.c
> index 1f2eed29a1df..0dccbb66eb26 100644
> --- a/SecurityPkg/Library/DxeTpmMeasureBootLib/DxeTpmMeasureBootLib.c
> +++ b/SecurityPkg/Library/DxeTpmMeasureBootLib/DxeTpmMeasureBootLib.c
> @@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ Finish:
> and other exception operations. The File parameter allows for possible logging
> within the SAP of the driver.
>
> - If File is NULL, then EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER is returned.
> + If File is NULL, then EFI_ACCESS_DENIED is returned.
>
> If the file specified by File with an authentication status specified by
> AuthenticationStatus is safe for the DXE Core to use, then EFI_SUCCESS is returned.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-04 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-04 22:26 [PATCH 1/1] SecurityPkg: Fix incorrect return value in documentation Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-04 23:28 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-02-05 14:18 ` [edk2-devel] " Wang, Jian J
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=da4893ce-89bf-d0de-a3e9-61aac8ce31e6@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox