public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Usama Arif via groups.io" <usamaarif642=gmail.com@groups.io>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, devel@edk2.groups.io,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, leitao@debian.org,
	gourry@gourry.net, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC 1/2] efi/memattr: Use desc_size instead of total size to check for corruption
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:27:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <db7edff7-8a87-41db-9e40-202a498c5e29@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALu+AoS8tb=HgaybDw5OG4A1QbOXHvuidpu0ynmz-nE1nBqzTA@mail.gmail.com>



On 13/01/2025 02:33, Dave Young wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 at 18:54, Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/01/2025 07:21, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 at 17:36, Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 09/01/2025 15:45, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 at 23:00, Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The commit in [1] introduced a check to see if EFI memory attributes
>>>>>> table was corrupted. It assumed that efi.memmap.nr_map remains
>>>>>> constant, but it changes during late boot.
>>>>>> Hence, the check is valid during cold boot, but not in the subsequent
>>>>>> kexec boot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is best explained with an exampled. At cold boot, for a test
>>>>>> machine:
>>>>>> efi.memmap.nr_map=91,
>>>>>> memory_attributes_table->num_entries=48,
>>>>>> desc_size = 48
>>>>>> Hence, the check introduced in [1] where 3x the size of the
>>>>>> entire EFI memory map is a reasonable upper bound for the size of this
>>>>>> table is valid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In late boot __efi_enter_virtual_mode calls 2 functions that updates
>>>>>> efi.memmap.nr_map:
>>>>>> - efi_map_regions which reduces the `count` of map entries
>>>>>>   (for e.g. if should_map_region returns false) and which is reflected
>>>>>>   in efi.memmap by __efi_memmap_init.
>>>>>>   At this point efi.memmap.nr_map becomes 46 in the test machine.
>>>>>> - efi_free_boot_services which also reduces the number of memory regions
>>>>>>   available (for e.g. if md->type or md->attribute is not the right value).
>>>>>>   At this point efi.memmap.nr_map becomes 9 in the test machine.
>>>>>> Hence when you kexec into a new kernel and pass efi.memmap, the
>>>>>> paramaters that are compared are:
>>>>>> efi.memmap.nr_map=9,
>>>>>> memory_attributes_table->num_entries=48,
>>>>>> desc_size = 48
>>>>>> where the check in [1] is no longer valid with such a low efi.memmap.nr_map
>>>>>> as it was reduced due to efi_map_regions and efi_free_boot_services.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A more appropriate check is to see if the description size reported by
>>>>>> efi and memory attributes table is the same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241031175822.2952471-2-ardb+git@google.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixes: 8fbe4c49c0cc ("efi/memattr: Ignore table if the size is clearly bogus")
>>>>>> Reported-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  drivers/firmware/efi/memattr.c | 16 ++++++----------
>>>>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The more I think about this, the more I feel that kexec on x86 should
>>>>> simply discard this table, and run with the firmware code RWX (which
>>>>> is not the end of the world).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> By discard this table, do you mean kexec not use e820_table_firmware?
>>>
>>> No, I mean kexec ignores the memory attributes table.
>>>
>>>> Also a very basic question, what do you mean by run with the firmware RWX?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The memory attributes table is an overlay for the EFI memory map that
>>> describes which runtime code regions may be mapped with restricted
>>> permissions. Without this table, everything will be mapped writable as
>>> well as executable, but only in the EFI page tables, which are only
>>> active when an EFI call is in progress.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for explaining!
>>
>> So basically get rid of memattr.c :)
>>
>> Do you mean get rid of it only for kexec, or not do it for any
>> boot (including cold boot)?
>> I do like this idea! I couldn't find this in the git history,
>> but do you know if this was added in the linux kernel just
>> because EFI spec added support for it, or if there was a
>> specific security problem?
>>
> 
> Usama, can you try the patch below?
> [ format is wrong due to webmail corruption.  But if it works I can
> send a formal patch later ]
> 
> $ git diff arch/x86
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> index 846bf49f2508..58dc77c5210e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> @@ -561,6 +561,11 @@ int __init efi_reuse_config(u64 tables, int nr_tables)
> 
>                 if (!efi_guidcmp(guid, SMBIOS_TABLE_GUID))
>                         ((efi_config_table_64_t *)p)->table = data->smbios;
> +
> +               /* Not bother to play with mem attr table across kexec */
> +               if (!efi_guidcmp(guid, EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE_GUID))
> +                       ((efi_config_table_64_t *)p)->table =
> EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR;
> +
>                 p += sz;
>         }
> 

This would work, I am guessing it will have a similar effect to what I sent
last week in 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/fd63613c-fd26-42de-b5ed-cc734f72eb36@gmail.com/

I think it needs to be wrapped in ifdef CONFIG_X86_64.



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#121017): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/121017
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/110517813/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-15 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-08 21:53 [edk2-devel] [RFC 0/2] efi/memattr: Fix memory corruption and warning issues Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-08 21:53 ` [edk2-devel] [RFC 1/2] efi/memattr: Use desc_size instead of total size to check for corruption Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-09 15:45   ` Ard Biesheuvel via groups.io
2025-01-09 16:36     ` Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-10  7:21       ` Ard Biesheuvel via groups.io
2025-01-10 10:53         ` Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-10 17:25           ` Ard Biesheuvel via groups.io
2025-01-13  2:33           ` Dave Young via groups.io
2025-01-13 11:27             ` Usama Arif via groups.io [this message]
2025-01-13 12:00               ` Usama Arif via groups.io
     [not found]                 ` <ed7ad48f-2270-4966-bdba-ccd4592a0fd4@gmail.com>
2025-01-20 10:32                   ` Ard Biesheuvel via groups.io
     [not found]                     ` <029cff22-f2e0-4796-9c27-1df056e08f8f@gmail.com>
2025-01-20 11:29                       ` Ard Biesheuvel via groups.io
2025-01-08 21:53 ` [edk2-devel] [RFC 2/2] efi/memattr: add efi_mem_attr_table as a reserved region in 820_table_firmware Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-09 16:15   ` Ard Biesheuvel via groups.io
2025-01-09 16:32     ` Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-09 16:47       ` Gregory Price
2025-01-10  7:32       ` Ard Biesheuvel via groups.io
2025-01-10 11:36         ` Breno Leitao
2025-01-10 17:33           ` Ard Biesheuvel via groups.io
2025-01-10 14:31         ` Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-10 15:50           ` Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-10  2:50   ` Dave Young via groups.io
2025-01-10 11:12     ` Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-10 11:18       ` Dave Young via groups.io
2025-01-10 11:20         ` Dave Young via groups.io
2025-01-10 11:42           ` Usama Arif via groups.io

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=db7edff7-8a87-41db-9e40-202a498c5e29@gmail.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox