From: "Usama Arif via groups.io" <usamaarif642=gmail.com@groups.io>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, devel@edk2.groups.io,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, leitao@debian.org,
gourry@gourry.net, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC 1/2] efi/memattr: Use desc_size instead of total size to check for corruption
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:27:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <db7edff7-8a87-41db-9e40-202a498c5e29@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALu+AoS8tb=HgaybDw5OG4A1QbOXHvuidpu0ynmz-nE1nBqzTA@mail.gmail.com>
On 13/01/2025 02:33, Dave Young wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 at 18:54, Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/01/2025 07:21, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 at 17:36, Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 09/01/2025 15:45, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 at 23:00, Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The commit in [1] introduced a check to see if EFI memory attributes
>>>>>> table was corrupted. It assumed that efi.memmap.nr_map remains
>>>>>> constant, but it changes during late boot.
>>>>>> Hence, the check is valid during cold boot, but not in the subsequent
>>>>>> kexec boot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is best explained with an exampled. At cold boot, for a test
>>>>>> machine:
>>>>>> efi.memmap.nr_map=91,
>>>>>> memory_attributes_table->num_entries=48,
>>>>>> desc_size = 48
>>>>>> Hence, the check introduced in [1] where 3x the size of the
>>>>>> entire EFI memory map is a reasonable upper bound for the size of this
>>>>>> table is valid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In late boot __efi_enter_virtual_mode calls 2 functions that updates
>>>>>> efi.memmap.nr_map:
>>>>>> - efi_map_regions which reduces the `count` of map entries
>>>>>> (for e.g. if should_map_region returns false) and which is reflected
>>>>>> in efi.memmap by __efi_memmap_init.
>>>>>> At this point efi.memmap.nr_map becomes 46 in the test machine.
>>>>>> - efi_free_boot_services which also reduces the number of memory regions
>>>>>> available (for e.g. if md->type or md->attribute is not the right value).
>>>>>> At this point efi.memmap.nr_map becomes 9 in the test machine.
>>>>>> Hence when you kexec into a new kernel and pass efi.memmap, the
>>>>>> paramaters that are compared are:
>>>>>> efi.memmap.nr_map=9,
>>>>>> memory_attributes_table->num_entries=48,
>>>>>> desc_size = 48
>>>>>> where the check in [1] is no longer valid with such a low efi.memmap.nr_map
>>>>>> as it was reduced due to efi_map_regions and efi_free_boot_services.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A more appropriate check is to see if the description size reported by
>>>>>> efi and memory attributes table is the same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241031175822.2952471-2-ardb+git@google.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixes: 8fbe4c49c0cc ("efi/memattr: Ignore table if the size is clearly bogus")
>>>>>> Reported-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/firmware/efi/memattr.c | 16 ++++++----------
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The more I think about this, the more I feel that kexec on x86 should
>>>>> simply discard this table, and run with the firmware code RWX (which
>>>>> is not the end of the world).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> By discard this table, do you mean kexec not use e820_table_firmware?
>>>
>>> No, I mean kexec ignores the memory attributes table.
>>>
>>>> Also a very basic question, what do you mean by run with the firmware RWX?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The memory attributes table is an overlay for the EFI memory map that
>>> describes which runtime code regions may be mapped with restricted
>>> permissions. Without this table, everything will be mapped writable as
>>> well as executable, but only in the EFI page tables, which are only
>>> active when an EFI call is in progress.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for explaining!
>>
>> So basically get rid of memattr.c :)
>>
>> Do you mean get rid of it only for kexec, or not do it for any
>> boot (including cold boot)?
>> I do like this idea! I couldn't find this in the git history,
>> but do you know if this was added in the linux kernel just
>> because EFI spec added support for it, or if there was a
>> specific security problem?
>>
>
> Usama, can you try the patch below?
> [ format is wrong due to webmail corruption. But if it works I can
> send a formal patch later ]
>
> $ git diff arch/x86
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> index 846bf49f2508..58dc77c5210e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> @@ -561,6 +561,11 @@ int __init efi_reuse_config(u64 tables, int nr_tables)
>
> if (!efi_guidcmp(guid, SMBIOS_TABLE_GUID))
> ((efi_config_table_64_t *)p)->table = data->smbios;
> +
> + /* Not bother to play with mem attr table across kexec */
> + if (!efi_guidcmp(guid, EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE_GUID))
> + ((efi_config_table_64_t *)p)->table =
> EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR;
> +
> p += sz;
> }
>
This would work, I am guessing it will have a similar effect to what I sent
last week in
https://lore.kernel.org/all/fd63613c-fd26-42de-b5ed-cc734f72eb36@gmail.com/
I think it needs to be wrapped in ifdef CONFIG_X86_64.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#121017): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/121017
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/110517813/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-15 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-08 21:53 [edk2-devel] [RFC 0/2] efi/memattr: Fix memory corruption and warning issues Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-08 21:53 ` [edk2-devel] [RFC 1/2] efi/memattr: Use desc_size instead of total size to check for corruption Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-09 15:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel via groups.io
2025-01-09 16:36 ` Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-10 7:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel via groups.io
2025-01-10 10:53 ` Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-10 17:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel via groups.io
2025-01-13 2:33 ` Dave Young via groups.io
2025-01-13 11:27 ` Usama Arif via groups.io [this message]
2025-01-13 12:00 ` Usama Arif via groups.io
[not found] ` <ed7ad48f-2270-4966-bdba-ccd4592a0fd4@gmail.com>
2025-01-20 10:32 ` Ard Biesheuvel via groups.io
[not found] ` <029cff22-f2e0-4796-9c27-1df056e08f8f@gmail.com>
2025-01-20 11:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel via groups.io
2025-01-08 21:53 ` [edk2-devel] [RFC 2/2] efi/memattr: add efi_mem_attr_table as a reserved region in 820_table_firmware Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-09 16:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel via groups.io
2025-01-09 16:32 ` Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-09 16:47 ` Gregory Price
2025-01-10 7:32 ` Ard Biesheuvel via groups.io
2025-01-10 11:36 ` Breno Leitao
2025-01-10 17:33 ` Ard Biesheuvel via groups.io
2025-01-10 14:31 ` Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-10 15:50 ` Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-10 2:50 ` Dave Young via groups.io
2025-01-10 11:12 ` Usama Arif via groups.io
2025-01-10 11:18 ` Dave Young via groups.io
2025-01-10 11:20 ` Dave Young via groups.io
2025-01-10 11:42 ` Usama Arif via groups.io
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=db7edff7-8a87-41db-9e40-202a498c5e29@gmail.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox