From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, thomas.lendacky@amd.com
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>,
Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>, Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>,
"Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 04/44] OvmfPkg/ResetVector: Add support for a 32-bit SEV check
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:42:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbce9d65-5144-7a06-2f0b-9f6dad6eaeea@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54ebf48fe05c20a1181a3dc90496e4835912ebf2.1568922728.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
On 09/19/19 21:52, Lendacky, Thomas wrote:
> From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>
> BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2198
>
> During BSP startup, the reset vector code will issue a CPUID instruction
> while in 32-bit mode. When running as an SEV-ES guest, this will trigger
> a #VC exception.
(1) In the assembly source code, please annotate both CPUID instructions
under CheckSevFeature, such as
; raises #VC when in an SEV-ES guest
>
> Add exception handling support to the early reset vector code to catch
> these exceptions. Also, since the guest is in 32-bit mode at this point,
> writes to the GHCB will be encrypted and thus not able to be read by the
> hypervisor, so use the GHCB CPUID request/response protocol to obtain the
> requested CPUID function values and provide these to the guest.
>
> The exception handling support is active during the SEV check and uses the
> OVMF temporary RAM space for a stack. After the SEV check is complete, the
> exception handling support is removed and the stack pointer cleared.
>
> Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> ---
> OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.inf | 2 +
> OvmfPkg/ResetVector/Ia32/PageTables64.asm | 177 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.nasmb | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.inf b/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.inf
> index b0ddfa5832a2..960b47cd0797 100644
> --- a/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.inf
> +++ b/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.inf
> @@ -35,3 +35,5 @@ [BuildOptions]
> [Pcd]
> gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfSecPageTablesBase
> gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfSecPageTablesSize
> + gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfSecPeiTempRamBase
> + gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfSecPeiTempRamSize
> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/Ia32/PageTables64.asm b/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/Ia32/PageTables64.asm
> index abad009f20f5..40f7814c1134 100644
> --- a/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/Ia32/PageTables64.asm
> +++ b/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/Ia32/PageTables64.asm
> @@ -33,10 +33,21 @@ BITS 32
>
> ; Check if Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) feature is enabled
> ;
> -; If SEV is enabled then EAX will be at least 32
> +; Modified: EAX, EBX, ECX, EDX, ESP
> +;
> +; If SEV is enabled then EAX will be at least 32.
> ; If SEV is disabled then EAX will be zero.
> ;
> CheckSevFeature:
> + ;
> + ; Set up exception handlers to check for SEV-ES
> + ; Load temporary RAM stack based on PCDs
> + ; Establish exception handlers
> + ;
> + mov esp, SEV_TOP_OF_STACK
(2) Can we %define SEV_TOP_OF_STACK in this file, or does it have to be
in "ResetVector.nasmb"?
(3) Do we have an estimate how much stack we need? This would be a
constraint on PcdOvmfSecPeiTempRamSize. The limit would be nice to
document (perhaps in a comment somewhere).
> + mov eax, ADDR_OF(Idtr)
> + lidt [cs:eax]
> +
> ; Check if we have a valid (0x8000_001F) CPUID leaf
> mov eax, 0x80000000
> cpuid
> @@ -73,6 +84,15 @@ NoSev:
> xor eax, eax
>
> SevExit:
> + ;
> + ; Clear exception handlers and stack
> + ;
> + push eax
> + mov eax, ADDR_OF(IdtrClear)
> + lidt [cs:eax]
> + pop eax
> + mov esp, 0
> +
I'm not sure the resultant IDT and ESP contents are the same as before
(pre-patch), but I guess these values should be OK too.
> OneTimeCallRet CheckSevFeature
>
> ;
> @@ -146,3 +166,158 @@ pageTableEntriesLoop:
> mov cr3, eax
>
> OneTimeCallRet SetCr3ForPageTables64
> +
> +SevEsIdtCommon:
> + hlt
> + jmp SevEsIdtCommon
> + iret
> +
> +SevEsIdtVmmComm:
> + ;
> + ; If we're here, then we are an SEV-ES guest and this
> + ; was triggered by a CPUID instruction
> + ;
> + pop ecx ; Error code
> + cmp ecx, 0x72 ; Be sure it was CPUID
> + jne SevEsIdtCommon
(4) Can you steal the DebugLog / PrintStringSi code from
"OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe/VbeShim.asm", and print a simple message to the
QEMU debug port, whenever you jump to SevEsIdtCommon?
This is basically an ASSERT(). It should have a message, if possible.
(I'm not sure if the OUT instruction will work with SEV-ES at this
stage, i.e. in 32-bit mode.)
> +
> + ;
> + ; Set up local variable room on the stack
> + ; CPUID function : + 28
> + ; CPUID register : + 24
> + ; GHCB MSR (EAX) : + 20
> + ; GHCB MSR (EDX) : + 16
> + ; CPUID result (EDX) : + 12
> + ; CPUID result (ECX) : + 8
> + ; CPUID result (EBX) : + 4
> + ; CPUID result (EAX) : + 0
> + sub esp, 32
(5) Can we %define macros for these offsets? (Including the size
constant 32.)
> +
> + ; Save CPUID function and initial register request
> + mov [esp + 28], eax
> + xor eax, eax
> + mov [esp + 24], eax
(6) The comment "CPUID register" (at offset 24), and the other comment
"initial register", are pretty confusing. Can you please document:
- the mapping: 0->EAX, ... 3->EDX,
- and the fact that the dword at [esp + 24] is the loop variable?
> +
> + ; Save current GHCB MSR value
> + mov ecx, 0xc0010130
> + rdmsr
> + mov [esp + 20], eax
> + mov [esp + 16], edx
> +
> +NextReg:
> + ;
> + ; Setup GHCB MSR
> + ; GHCB_MSR[63:32] = CPUID function
> + ; GHCB_MSR[31:30] = CPUID register
> + ; GHCB_MSR[11:0] = CPUID request protocol
> + ;
> + mov eax, [esp + 24]
> + cmp eax, 4
> + jge VmmDone
> +
> + shl eax, 30
> + or eax, 0x004
(7) Please %define GHCBInfoCpuIdRequest or something similar for the
value 4.
> + mov edx, [esp + 28]
> + mov ecx, 0xc0010130
> + wrmsr
> +
> + ; Issue VMGEXIT (rep; vmmcall)
> + db 0xf3
> + db 0x0f
> + db 0x01
> + db 0xd9
(8) Can you please file an RFE at <https://bugzilla.nasm.us/>, for
supporting this instruction, and add the link here, as a comment? I've
been fighting an uphill battle against DB-encoded instructions in edk2
assembly code.
> +
> + ;
> + ; Read GHCB MSR
> + ; GHCB_MSR[63:32] = CPUID register value
> + ; GHCB_MSR[31:30] = CPUID register
> + ; GHCB_MSR[11:0] = CPUID response protocol
> + ;
> + mov ecx, 0xc0010130
> + rdmsr
> + mov ecx, eax
> + and ecx, 0xfff
> + cmp ecx, 0x005
(9) Please %define GHCBInfoCpuIdResponse for value 5.
> + jne SevEsIdtCommon
(10) Please see (4). The message could be, "no GHCBInfoCpuIdResponse
received", or similar.
> +
> + ; Save returned value
> + shr eax, 30
> + and eax, 0x3
(11) Do we need the AND after the SHR? I think the new high order bits
from the SHR should be zero.
> + shl eax, 2
> + mov ecx, esp
> + add ecx, eax
> + mov [ecx], edx
(12) The beauty of the lean and mean x86 instruction set:
mov [esp + eax * 4], edx
(I tested just this one instruction with nasm + ndisasm; the encoding is
0x89, 0x14, 0x84.)
> +
> + ; Next register
> + inc word [esp + 24]
> +
> + jmp NextReg
> +
> +VmmDone:
> + ;
> + ; At this point we have all CPUID register values. Restore the GHCB MSR,
> + ; set the return register values and return.
> + ;
> + mov eax, [esp + 20]
> + mov edx, [esp + 16]
> + mov ecx, 0xc0010130
> + wrmsr
> +
> + mov eax, [esp + 0]
> + mov ebx, [esp + 4]
> + mov ecx, [esp + 8]
> + mov edx, [esp + 12]
> +
> + add esp, 32
(13) Please see (5).
> + add word [esp], 2 ; Skip over the CPUID instruction
OK, this seems safe. CPUID has only one encoding (0x0F, 0xA2), and we
checked SW_EXITCODE = 0x72 at the top.
> + iret
> +
> +ALIGN 2
> +
> +Idtr:
> + dw IDT_END - IDT_BASE - 1 ; Limit
> + dd ADDR_OF(IDT_BASE) ; Base
> +
> +IdtrClear:
> + dw 0 ; Limit
> + dd 0 ; Base
> +
> +ALIGN 16
> +
> +;
> +; The Interrupt Descriptor Table (IDT)
> +; This will be used to determine if SEV-ES is enabled. Upon execution
> +; of the CPUID instruction, a VMM Communication Exception will occur.
> +; This will tell us if SEV-ES is enabled. We can use the current value
> +; of the GHCB MSR to determine the SEV attributes.
> +;
> +IDT_BASE:
> +;
> +; Vectors 0 - 28
> +;
> +%rep 29
> + dw (ADDR_OF(SevEsIdtCommon) & 0xffff) ; Offset low bits 15..0
> + dw 0x10 ; Selector
> + db 0 ; Reserved
> + db 0x8E ; Gate Type (IA32_IDT_GATE_TYPE_INTERRUPT_32)
> + dw (ADDR_OF(SevEsIdtCommon) >> 16) ; Offset high bits 31..16
> +%endrep
> +;
> +; Vector 29 (VMM Communication Exception)
> +;
> + dw (ADDR_OF(SevEsIdtVmmComm) & 0xffff) ; Offset low bits 15..0
> + dw 0x10 ; Selector
> + db 0 ; Reserved
> + db 0x8E ; Gate Type (IA32_IDT_GATE_TYPE_INTERRUPT_32)
> + dw (ADDR_OF(SevEsIdtVmmComm) >> 16) ; Offset high bits 31..16
> +;
> +; Vectors 30 - 31
> +;
> +%rep 2
> + dw (ADDR_OF(SevEsIdtCommon) & 0xffff) ; Offset low bits 15..0
> + dw 0x10 ; Selector
> + db 0 ; Reserved
> + db 0x8E ; Gate Type (IA32_IDT_GATE_TYPE_INTERRUPT_32)
> + dw (ADDR_OF(SevEsIdtCommon) >> 16) ; Offset high bits 31..16
> +%endrep
> +IDT_END:
(14) Above, we have two explicit jumps to SevEsIdtCommon, and I've asked
for meaningful assertion messages there.
For the uninteresting exception vectors 0-28 and 30-31, can we use a
handler that is not directly SevEsIdtCommon, but logs a message, and
then jumps to SevEsIdtCommon? (It could even be implemented as a
"prefix" of SevEsIdtCommon, and then no jump would be required.)
> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.nasmb b/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.nasmb
> index 75cfe16654b1..3b213cd05ab2 100644
> --- a/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.nasmb
> +++ b/OvmfPkg/ResetVector/ResetVector.nasmb
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
>
> %define PT_ADDR(Offset) (FixedPcdGet32 (PcdOvmfSecPageTablesBase) + (Offset))
> %include "Ia32/Flat32ToFlat64.asm"
> + %define SEV_TOP_OF_STACK (FixedPcdGet32 (PcdOvmfSecPeiTempRamBase) + FixedPcdGet32 (PcdOvmfSecPeiTempRamSize))
> %include "Ia32/PageTables64.asm"
> %endif
>
>
(I've commented on this under (2).)
Thanks!
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-24 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 106+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-19 19:52 [RFC PATCH v2 00/44] SEV-ES guest support Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/44] MdePkg: Create PCDs to be used in support of SEV-ES Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/44] OvmfPkg/MemEncryptSevLib: Add an SEV-ES guest indicator function Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-24 11:53 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/44] OvmfPkg: Add support to perform SEV-ES initialization Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-24 11:59 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-24 14:43 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/44] OvmfPkg/ResetVector: Add support for a 32-bit SEV check Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-24 13:42 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-09-24 13:50 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-24 18:57 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-25 14:45 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-30 19:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-30 19:55 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/44] MdePkg: Add the MSR definition for the GHCB register Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/44] OvmfPkg: Create a GHCB page for use during Sec phase Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-25 8:09 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-25 17:36 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/44] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: Reserve GHCB-related areas if S3 is supported Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-25 8:27 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-25 17:52 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/44] OvmfPkg: Create GHCB pages for use during Pei and Dxe phase Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-26 8:00 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-26 14:00 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-30 18:52 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-30 19:49 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-30 19:12 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-30 19:51 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-10-02 10:23 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-02 14:43 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-10-02 15:55 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/44] MdeModulePkg/DxeIplPeim: Support GHCB pages when creating page tables Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/44] OvmfPkg: A per-CPU variable area for #VC usage Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-26 8:17 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-26 14:46 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-30 19:15 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-30 19:52 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-10-02 11:51 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-02 16:06 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-10-03 9:06 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/44] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: Move early GDT into ram when SEV-ES is enabled Lendacky, Thomas
2019-10-02 12:05 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-02 16:10 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/44] MdePkg: Add a structure definition for the GHCB Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/44] MdePkg/BaseLib: Add support for the VMGEXIT instruction Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/44] UefiCpuPkg: Implement library support for VMGEXIT Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/44] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandler: Add base support for the #VC exception Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/44] OvmfPkg/MemEncryptSevLib: Make MemEncryptSevLib available during SEC Lendacky, Thomas
2019-10-02 12:24 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-02 12:30 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-02 16:16 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/44] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandler: Add #VC exception handling for Sec phase Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/44] OvmfPkg/Sec: Enable cache early to speed up booting Lendacky, Thomas
2019-10-02 12:31 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/44] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandler: Add support for IOIO_PROT NAE events Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/44] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandler: Support string IO " Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/44] MdePkg: Add support for the XGETBV instruction Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/44] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandler: Add support for CPUID NAE events Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/44] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandler: Add support for MSR_PROT " Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/44] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandler: Add support for NPF NAE events (MMIO) Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/44] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandler: Add support for WBINVD NAE events Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/44] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandler: Add support for RDTSC " Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/44] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandler: Add support for RDPMC " Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/44] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandler: Add support for INVD " Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/44] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandler: Add support for VMMCALL " Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/44] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandler: Add support for RDTSCP " Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/44] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandler: Add support for MONITOR/MONITORX " Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 32/44] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandler: Add support for MWAIT/MWAITX " Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 33/44] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandler: Add support for DR7 Read/Write " Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 34/44] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Update CPU MP data with a flag to indicate if SEV-ES is active Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 36/44] UefiCpuPkg: Add a 16-bit protected mode code segment descriptor Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 35/44] MdeModulePkg: Reserve " Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-19 19:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 37/44] OvmfPkg: Add support for SEV-ES AP reset vector re-directing Lendacky, Thomas
2019-10-02 14:54 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-02 17:33 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-10-03 9:09 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-19 19:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 38/44] UefiCpuPkg: Allow AP booting under SEV-ES Lendacky, Thomas
2019-10-02 15:15 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-02 15:26 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-02 18:07 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-10-03 10:12 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-03 10:32 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-03 15:12 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-10-10 23:17 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-10-10 23:56 ` Andrew Fish
2019-10-11 8:56 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-12 6:42 ` Andrew Fish
2019-10-12 7:46 ` Liming Gao
2019-10-12 18:50 ` Andrew Fish
2019-10-14 13:11 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-14 19:11 ` Andrew Fish
2019-10-02 17:58 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-10-03 9:21 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-19 19:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 40/44] MdePkg: Add a finalization function to the CPU protocol Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-20 13:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 39/44] OvmfPkg: Move the GHCB allocations into reserved memory Lendacky, Thomas
2019-10-02 14:38 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-20 13:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 42/44] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Prepare SEV-ES guest APs for OS use Lendacky, Thomas
2019-12-12 8:24 ` Ni, Ray
2019-12-13 16:35 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-20 13:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 41/44] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Add MP finalization interface to MpInitLib Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-20 13:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 43/44] UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe: Provide an DXE MP finalization routine to support SEV-ES Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-20 13:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 44/44] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Perform the CPU protocol finalization support Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-20 19:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/44] SEV-ES guest support Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-24 1:55 ` [edk2-devel] " Dong, Eric
2019-09-24 14:31 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-09-25 22:31 ` Ni, Ray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dbce9d65-5144-7a06-2f0b-9f6dad6eaeea@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox