From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=66.187.233.73; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B71C6207E53F8 for ; Thu, 24 May 2018 10:25:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BE8440BC048; Thu, 24 May 2018 17:25:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-121-84.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.121.84]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690512026985; Thu, 24 May 2018 17:25:57 +0000 (UTC) To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: edk2-devel-01 , Jordan Justen References: <20180523202121.8125-1-lersek@redhat.com> <20180523202121.8125-2-lersek@redhat.com> <79485048-7ee5-c3ee-40b6-25f0eeb46ca6@redhat.com> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 19:25:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.7]); Thu, 24 May 2018 17:25:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.7]); Thu, 24 May 2018 17:25:58 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.4' DOMAIN:'int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'lersek@redhat.com' RCPT:'' Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] OvmfPkg: introduce PciCapLib X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 17:25:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/24/18 16:41, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 24 May 2018 at 16:39, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 05/24/18 09:53, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>>> +RETURN_STATUS >>>> +EFIAPI >>>> +PciCapGetInfo ( >>>> + IN PCI_CAP *Cap, >>>> + OUT PCI_CAP_INFO *Info >>>> + ) >>>> +{ >>>> + PCI_CAP *InstanceZero; >>>> + >>> >>> Nit: add >>> >>> ASSERT (Info != NULL); >>> >>> here? >>> >>> I know it seems rather arbitrary to add it here and not anywhere else, >>> but PciCapGetInfo() is part of the API, and dereferencing Info [which >>> may be the result of e.g., a pool allocation] for writing is >>> particularly bad. >> >> >> I will add the ASSERT(). >> >> (I hope I didn't miss any of your comments!) >> > > It's just a nit, feel free to ignore. > > In any case, > > Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel > Thanks! I'll add the ASSERT. Laszlo