From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] OvmfPkg/IndustryStandard: define macros for QEMU's CPU hotplug registers
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:12:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dcb22fb4-40db-0174-3b1f-8160e370ecfe@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78640e55-de54-2c02-98d8-2fbdc7922a73@redhat.com>
On 10/24/19 12:29 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 10/23/19 14:05, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Hi Laszlo,
>>
>> On 10/23/19 12:15 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> In v1.5.0, QEMU's "pc" (i440fx) board gained a "CPU present bitmap"
>>> register block. In v2.0.0, this was extended to the "q35" board.
>>>
>>> In v2.7.0, a new (read/write) register interface was laid over the "CPU
>>> present bitmap", with an option for the guest to switch the register
>>> block
>>> to the new (a.k.a. modern) interface.
>>
>> This historical information is helpful to understand when these QEMU
>> models started to diverge from the original chipset datasheet.
>>
>>> Both interfaces are documented in "docs/specs/acpi_cpu_hotplug.txt" in
>>> the
>>> QEMU tree.
>>>
>>> Add macros for a minimal subset of the modern interface, just so we can
>>> count the possible CPUs (as opposed to boot CPUs) in a later patch in
>>> this
>>> series.
>>>
>>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>>> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
>>> Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1515
>>> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Notes:
>>> v2:
>>> - use QEMU's existent CPU hotplug register block, rather than a new
>>> named file in fw_cfg [Igor]
>>>
>>> OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/I440FxPiix4.h | 5 +++
>>> OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Q35MchIch9.h | 2 +
>>> OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/QemuCpuHotplug.h | 43
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/I440FxPiix4.h
>>> b/OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/I440FxPiix4.h
>>> index e7d7fde14c65..3973ff0a95b4 100644
>>> --- a/OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/I440FxPiix4.h
>>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/I440FxPiix4.h
>>> @@ -44,6 +44,11 @@
>>> BIT10 | BIT9 | BIT8 | BIT7 | BIT6)
>>> #define PIIX4_PMREGMISC 0x80
>>> #define PIIX4_PMREGMISC_PMIOSE BIT0
>>> +//
>>> +// IO ports
>>> +//
>>> +#define PIIX4_CPU_HOTPLUG_BASE 0xAF00
>>
>> OK
>>
>>> +
>>> #endif
>>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Q35MchIch9.h
>>> b/OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Q35MchIch9.h
>>> index 391cb4622226..2ac16f19c62e 100644
>>> --- a/OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Q35MchIch9.h
>>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Q35MchIch9.h
>>> @@ -104,10 +104,12 @@
>>> // IO ports
>>> //
>>> #define ICH9_APM_CNT 0xB2
>>> #define ICH9_APM_STS 0xB3
>>> +#define ICH9_CPU_HOTPLUG_BASE 0x0CD8
>>
>> OK
>>
>>> +
>>> //
>>> // IO ports relative to PMBASE
>>> //
>>> #define ICH9_PMBASE_OFS_SMI_EN 0x30
>>> #define ICH9_SMI_EN_APMC_EN BIT5
>>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/QemuCpuHotplug.h
>>> b/OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/QemuCpuHotplug.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..cf0745610f2c
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/QemuCpuHotplug.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
>>> +/** @file
>>> + Macros for accessing QEMU's CPU hotplug register block.
>>> +
>>> + Copyright (C) 2019, Red Hat, Inc.
>>> +
>>> + SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
>>> +
>>> + @par Specification Reference:
>>> +
>>> + - "docs/specs/acpi_cpu_hotplug.txt" in the QEMU source tree.
>>> +
>>> + The original (now "legacy") CPU hotplug interface appeared in
>>> QEMU v1.5.0.
>>> + The new ("modern") hotplug interface appeared in QEMU v2.7.0.
>>> +
>>> + The macros in this header file map to the minimal subset of the
>>> modern
>>> + interface that OVMF needs.
>>> +**/
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef QEMU_CPU_HOTPLUG_H_
>>> +#define QEMU_CPU_HOTPLUG_H_
>>> +
>>> +#include <Base.h>
>>> +
>>> +//
>>> +// Each register offset is:
>>> +// - relative to the board-dependent IO base address of the register
>>> block,
>>> +// - named QEMU_CPUHP_(R|W|RW)_*, according to the possible access
>>> modes of the
>>> +// register,
>>> +// - followed by distinguished bitmasks or values in the register.
>>> +//
>>> +#define QEMU_CPUHP_R_CMD_DATA2 0x0
>>
>> I don't understand this one. Read register 0x0 is marked "reserved"
>> in the spec, and CMD_DATA are registers [0x8 .. 0xb].
>
> The documentation (spec) is being cleaned up, and also extended. Please
> see the following QEMU patch set (warning: long discussion):
>
> [qemu-devel] [RFC 0/3] acpi: cphp: add CPHP_GET_CPU_ID_CMD command to
> cpu hotplug MMIO interface
>
> http://mid.mail-archive.com/20191009132252.17860-1-imammedo@redhat.com
>
> In that qemu RFC series, the first two patches are of primary interest
> here, for this edk2 / OvmfPkg patch set. The first two patches will not
> extend the modern interface, they will just document it better (clean up
> the documentation for the existent behavior).
OK I read it, but it is still RFC, so this patch shouldn't get merged
until the QEMU counterpart get merged, right?
> If you look at the next patch in this series, you'll see that the
> OvmfPkg/PlatformPei code uses QEMU_CPUHP_R_CMD_DATA2 considering *both*
> situations, that is,
> - when the offset range [0..3] is marked as reserved for reading,
> - and when it is specified as Command Data 2 (by the last patch in the
> QEMU RFC series).
>
> Therefore, we could call this register
>
> QEMU_CPUHP_R_RESERVED_0
>
> for now, but very soon we'd have to rename it to the above-proposed
>
> QEMU_CPUHP_R_CMD_DATA2
>
> anyway. Again, the code considers both cases.
>
> (In fact, the code in the next patch considers *four* cases:
> - hotplug register block absent,
> - hotplug register block present, but only legacy mode is supported,
> - hotplug register block present, modern mode available, but offset 0 is
> still reserved for reading,
> - hotplug register block present, modern mode available, offset 0
> defined as Cmd Data 2.)
Understood.
This patch is fine then.
Since the QEMU spec is RFC and not merged, I'm worried it might
change. I'd rather review this patch again once the QEMU spec
update is accepted/merged.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
>>
>>> +
>>> +#define QEMU_CPUHP_R_CPU_STAT 0x4
>>> +#define QEMU_CPUHP_STAT_ENABLED BIT0
>>
>> OK
>>
>>> +
>>> +#define QEMU_CPUHP_RW_CMD_DATA 0x8
>>
>> Here the spec says "DWORD access" but the implementation use
>> "BYTE access" (see AcpiCpuHotplug_ops in hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.c).
>> I understand this as "there are 4 consecutive BYTE register).
>
> You are looking at the legacy mode of the register block (documented
> near the top of the "docs/specs/acpi_cpu_hotplug.txt" file).
>
> The operations for modern mode are in "hw/acpi/cpu.c", object
> "cpu_hotplug_ops".
>
>
>> Not this patch problem although.
>>
>>> +
>>> +#define QEMU_CPUHP_W_CPU_SEL 0x0
>>
>> Another "DWORD access". OK.
>>
>>> +
>>> +#define QEMU_CPUHP_W_CMD 0x5
>>> +#define QEMU_CPUHP_CMD_GET_PENDING 0x0
>>
>> 'PENDING' is more meaningful than "CPU device with
>> inserting/removing events". OK
>
> Thanks!
> Laszlo
>
>>
>>> +
>>> +#endif // QEMU_CPU_HOTPLUG_H_
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-24 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-22 22:15 [PATCH v2 0/3] OvmfPkg: distinguish boot CPU count from possible CPU count Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-22 22:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] OvmfPkg/OvmfXen.dsc: remove PcdCpu* dynamic defaults Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-24 14:18 ` Anthony PERARD
2019-10-22 22:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] OvmfPkg/IndustryStandard: define macros for QEMU's CPU hotplug registers Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-23 12:05 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-24 10:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-24 15:12 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2019-10-25 8:21 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-01-24 11:40 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-01-29 14:43 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-01-29 17:30 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-22 22:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: rewrite MaxCpuCountInitialization() for CPU hotplug Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-24 14:27 ` Anthony PERARD
2019-10-24 15:28 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-24 15:33 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-25 8:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-25 9:17 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-23 8:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] OvmfPkg: distinguish boot CPU count from possible CPU count Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dcb22fb4-40db-0174-3b1f-8160e370ecfe@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox