From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.3176.1585857209292062917 for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 12:53:29 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.231, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jK5u4-0001dV-Ab; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 13:53:28 -0600 Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.67]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jK5tx-0004s2-Gs; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 13:53:27 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50854161AD0; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:53:21 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta3.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta3.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id WiKVdCHx0bDJ; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:53:21 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (muon.bluestop.org [65.103.231.193]) (Authenticated sender: rebecca@bsdio.com) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16BB71618E8; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:53:21 -0600 (MDT) To: devel@edk2.groups.io, michael.d.kinney@intel.com References: <066c8d8c-95bf-8fa7-7dda-a8ac0130c403@bsdio.com> From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 13:53:20 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-XM-SPF: eid=1jK5tx-0004s2-Gs;;;mid=;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.67;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.67 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa03.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_40, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,TooManyTo_001, XMSubLong,XM_B_Unsub autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * -0.0 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40% * [score: 0.2096] * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa03 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 0.5 XM_B_Unsub Unsubscribe in body of email but missing unsubscribe * header X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa03 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;devel@edk2.groups.io, michael.d.kinney@intel.com X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 6360 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 4.5 (0.1%), b_tie_ro: 3.0 (0.0%), parse: 1.28 (0.0%), extract_message_metadata: 19 (0.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.93 (0.0%), tests_pri_-1000: 13 (0.2%), tests_pri_-950: 0.98 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900: 0.78 (0.0%), tests_pri_-90: 59 (0.9%), check_bayes: 58 (0.9%), b_tokenize: 6 (0.1%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (0.1%), b_comp_prob: 2.8 (0.0%), b_tok_touch_all: 38 (0.6%), b_finish: 0.75 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 283 (4.4%), check_dkim_signature: 0.42 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 62 (1.0%), poll_dns_idle: 6016 (94.6%), tests_pri_10: 1.61 (0.0%), tests_pri_500: 5974 (93.9%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Need newer releases/tags added to TianoCore Bugzilla X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Okay, but the edk2-stable202002 release is also missing. -- Rebecca Cran On 4/2/20 1:24 PM, Michael D Kinney wrote: > Rebecca, > > The current use of that field is to identify previous > releases that a bug fix needs to be propagated to. > > We do not know the exact release name for future releases > until we make the release. > > I recommend you use the "Deadline" field to provide > the date the feature must be implemented, reviewed, > and committed in order to make the release that is > targeted. > > In many cases the set of work items for a specific > target release need to have deadlines well before > the soft/hard freeze dates and will not have the > same deadline date. Only providing the target release > name is not enough to properly plan tasks. > > Thanks, > > Mike > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On >> Behalf Of Rebecca Cran >> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 11:52 AM >> To: Kinney, Michael D ; >> devel@edk2.groups.io >> Subject: [edk2-devel] Need newer releases/tags added to >> TianoCore Bugzilla >> >> At least for the Feature Requests, the "Release(s) the >> issue is >> observed" and "Release(s) the issues must be fixed" >> fields are outdated, >> and missing newer tags. >> >> I haven't checked if the other areas such as bug reports >> also need updated. >> >> >> -- >> >> Rebecca Cran >> >> >> >> > > >