From: "Kun Qin" <kuqin12@gmail.com>
To: "Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] MdeModulePkg: MemoryProfileInfo: Updated MessageLength calculation
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 14:29:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dec9ac57-eb9a-07ac-951f-191a5ac24c5f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN8PR11MB36660372B4EB87EF3C4CE1F8CA349@BN8PR11MB3666.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Hao,
Thanks for pointing out the missing place. Will update this accordingly.
This patch series needs a PI spec update, I thought I should mark all
changes with BZ#### before the spec update is taken. But I can drop them
for the next patch version.
Regards,
Kun
On 06/11/2021 00:46, Wu, Hao A wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kun Qin <kuqin12@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 9:43 AM
>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
>> Cc: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH v1 3/5] MdeModulePkg: MemoryProfileInfo: Updated
>> MessageLength calculation
>>
>> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3398
>>
>> This change replaced the calculation of communication buffer size from
>> explicitly adding the size of each member with the OFFSET macro function.
>> This will make the structure field defition change transparent to consumers.
>
>
> I think there is one missing place in function GetSmramProfileData():
>
> MinimalSizeNeeded = sizeof (EFI_GUID) +
> sizeof (UINTN) +
> MAX (sizeof (SMRAM_PROFILE_PARAMETER_GET_PROFILE_INFO),
> MAX (sizeof (SMRAM_PROFILE_PARAMETER_GET_PROFILE_DATA_BY_OFFSET),
> sizeof (SMRAM_PROFILE_PARAMETER_RECORDING_STATE)));
>
> More inline comments below:
>
>
>>
>> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
>> Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kun Qin <kuqin12@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> MdeModulePkg/Application/MemoryProfileInfo/MemoryProfileInfo.c | 20
>> +++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/MdeModulePkg/Application/MemoryProfileInfo/MemoryProfileInfo.c
>> b/MdeModulePkg/Application/MemoryProfileInfo/MemoryProfileInfo.c
>> index 191c31068545..39ed8b2e0484 100644
>> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Application/MemoryProfileInfo/MemoryProfileInfo.c
>> +++
>> b/MdeModulePkg/Application/MemoryProfileInfo/MemoryProfileInfo.c
>> @@ -1190,7 +1190,9 @@ GetSmramProfileData (
>> CommRecordingState->Header.ReturnStatus = (UINT64)-1;
>> CommRecordingState->RecordingState =
>> MEMORY_PROFILE_RECORDING_DISABLE;
>>
>> - CommSize = sizeof (EFI_GUID) + sizeof (UINTN) + CommHeader-
>>> MessageLength;
>> + // BZ3398: Make MessageLength the same size in
>> EFI_MM_COMMUNICATE_HEADER for both IA32 and X64.
>> + // The CommHeader->MessageLength contains a definitive value, thus
>> UINTN cast is safe here.
>
>
> Please help to drop the explicit mention of BZ3398 in the comment.
> How about using:
> //
> // The CommHeader->MessageLength contains a definitive value, thus UINTN cast is safe here.
> //
>
> There are 4 more similar cases below.
>
> Best Regards,
> Hao Wu
>
>
>> + CommSize = OFFSET_OF(EFI_SMM_COMMUNICATE_HEADER, Data) +
>> + (UINTN)CommHeader->MessageLength;
>> Status = SmmCommunication->Communicate (SmmCommunication,
>> CommBuffer, &CommSize);
>> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>> DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "SmramProfile: SmmCommunication - %r\n",
>> Status)); @@ -1213,7 +1215,9 @@ GetSmramProfileData (
>> CommRecordingState->Header.ReturnStatus = (UINT64)-1;
>> CommRecordingState->RecordingState =
>> MEMORY_PROFILE_RECORDING_DISABLE;
>>
>> - CommSize = sizeof (EFI_GUID) + sizeof (UINTN) + CommHeader-
>>> MessageLength;
>> + // BZ3398: Make MessageLength the same size in
>> EFI_MM_COMMUNICATE_HEADER for both IA32 and X64.
>> + // The CommHeader->MessageLength contains a definitive value, thus
>> UINTN cast is safe here.
>> + CommSize = OFFSET_OF(EFI_SMM_COMMUNICATE_HEADER, Data) +
>> + (UINTN)CommHeader->MessageLength;
>> SmmCommunication->Communicate (SmmCommunication, CommBuffer,
>> &CommSize);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1230,7 +1234,9 @@ GetSmramProfileData (
>> CommGetProfileInfo->Header.ReturnStatus = (UINT64)-1;
>> CommGetProfileInfo->ProfileSize = 0;
>>
>> - CommSize = sizeof (EFI_GUID) + sizeof (UINTN) + CommHeader-
>>> MessageLength;
>> + // BZ3398: Make MessageLength the same size in
>> EFI_MM_COMMUNICATE_HEADER for both IA32 and X64.
>> + // The CommHeader->MessageLength contains a definitive value, thus
>> UINTN cast is safe here.
>> + CommSize = OFFSET_OF(EFI_SMM_COMMUNICATE_HEADER, Data) +
>> + (UINTN)CommHeader->MessageLength;
>> Status = SmmCommunication->Communicate (SmmCommunication,
>> CommBuffer, &CommSize);
>> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>>
>> @@ -1261,7 +1267,9 @@ GetSmramProfileData (
>> CommGetProfileData->Header.DataLength = sizeof
>> (*CommGetProfileData);
>> CommGetProfileData->Header.ReturnStatus = (UINT64)-1;
>>
>> - CommSize = sizeof (EFI_GUID) + sizeof (UINTN) + CommHeader-
>>> MessageLength;
>> + // BZ3398: Make MessageLength the same size in
>> EFI_MM_COMMUNICATE_HEADER for both IA32 and X64.
>> + // The CommHeader->MessageLength contains a definitive value, thus
>> UINTN cast is safe here.
>> + CommSize = OFFSET_OF(EFI_SMM_COMMUNICATE_HEADER, Data) +
>> + (UINTN)CommHeader->MessageLength;
>> Buffer = (UINT8 *) CommHeader + CommSize;
>> Size -= CommSize;
>>
>> @@ -1320,7 +1328,9 @@ GetSmramProfileData (
>> CommRecordingState->Header.ReturnStatus = (UINT64)-1;
>> CommRecordingState->RecordingState =
>> MEMORY_PROFILE_RECORDING_ENABLE;
>>
>> - CommSize = sizeof (EFI_GUID) + sizeof (UINTN) + CommHeader-
>>> MessageLength;
>> + // BZ3398: Make MessageLength the same size in
>> EFI_MM_COMMUNICATE_HEADER for both IA32 and X64.
>> + // The CommHeader->MessageLength contains a definitive value, thus
>> UINTN cast is safe here.
>> + CommSize = OFFSET_OF(EFI_SMM_COMMUNICATE_HEADER, Data) +
>> + (UINTN)CommHeader->MessageLength;
>> SmmCommunication->Communicate (SmmCommunication, CommBuffer,
>> &CommSize);
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.31.1.windows.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-11 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-10 1:42 [PATCH v1 0/5] EDK2 Code First: PI Specification: Update EFI_MM_COMMUNICATE_HEADER Kun Qin
2021-06-10 1:42 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] EDK2 Code First: PI Specification: EFI_MM_COMMUNICATE_HEADER Update Kun Qin
2021-06-11 7:46 ` [edk2-devel] " Wu, Hao A
2021-06-15 20:51 ` Kun Qin
2021-06-16 1:15 ` Wu, Hao A
2021-06-24 0:53 ` Kun Qin
2021-06-24 3:26 ` [EXTERNAL] " Bret Barkelew
2021-06-28 6:18 ` Wu, Hao A
2021-06-10 1:42 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] MdeModulePkg: PiSmmIpl: Update MessageLength calculation for MmCommunicate Kun Qin
2021-06-11 7:46 ` Wu, Hao A
2021-06-10 1:42 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] MdeModulePkg: MemoryProfileInfo: Updated MessageLength calculation Kun Qin
2021-06-11 7:46 ` Wu, Hao A
2021-06-11 21:29 ` Kun Qin [this message]
2021-06-14 23:20 ` [edk2-devel] " Wu, Hao A
2021-06-10 1:42 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] MdeModulePkg: SmiHandlerProfileInfo: " Kun Qin
2021-06-11 7:47 ` Wu, Hao A
2021-06-10 1:42 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] MdePkg: MmCommunication: Extend MessageLength field size to UINT64 Kun Qin
2021-06-16 7:02 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 0/5] EDK2 Code First: PI Specification: Update EFI_MM_COMMUNICATE_HEADER Marvin Häuser
2021-06-16 20:58 ` Kun Qin
2021-06-18 9:37 ` Marvin Häuser
2021-06-22 15:34 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-06-23 6:54 ` Marvin Häuser
2021-06-23 15:26 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-06-24 0:24 ` Kun Qin
2021-06-24 8:00 ` Marvin Häuser
2021-06-24 15:25 ` Michael D Kinney
2021-06-25 18:47 ` Kun Qin
2021-06-28 14:57 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-06-28 15:43 ` Marvin Häuser
2021-06-29 6:49 ` [EXTERNAL] " Bret Barkelew
2021-06-29 8:58 ` Marvin Häuser
2021-06-29 15:59 ` Bret Barkelew
2021-06-29 17:28 ` Michael D Kinney
2021-06-29 23:10 ` Kun Qin
2021-06-30 1:07 ` Michael D Kinney
2021-06-30 7:56 ` Kun Qin
2021-06-29 17:22 ` Michael D Kinney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dec9ac57-eb9a-07ac-951f-191a5ac24c5f@gmail.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox