From: "Ankur Arora" <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>,
Aaron Young <aaron.young@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v8 08/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: add EjectCpu()
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 12:51:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df838cdc-d2a2-dd69-5ca6-c11a774f97af@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e37922f-afbe-2b41-4eb9-4b3c62d28aa9@redhat.com>
On 2021-02-23 12:36 p.m., Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> superficial comments only; the patch is nearly ready:
>
> On 02/22/21 08:19, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> Add EjectCpu(), which handles the CPU ejection, and provides a holding
>> area for said CPUs. It is called via SmmCpuFeaturesRendezvousExit(),
>> at the tail end of the SMI handling.
>>
>> Also UnplugCpus() now stashes QEMU Selectors of CPUs which need to be
>> ejected in CPU_HOT_EJECT_DATA.QemuSelectorMap. This is used by
>> EjectCpu() to identify CPUs marked for ejection.
>>
>> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
>> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
>> Cc: Aaron Young <aaron.young@oracle.com>
>> Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3132
>> Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>> Address these review comments from v6:
>> (1) s/CpuEject/EjectCpu/g
>> (2) Ensure that the added include is in sorted order.
>> (3) Switch to a cheaper CpuSleep() based loop instead of
>> CpuDeadLoop(). Also add the CpuLib LibraryClass.
>> (4) Remove the nested else clause
>> (5) Use Laszlo's much clearer comment when we try to map multiple
>> QemuSelector to the same ProcessorNum.
>> (6a) Fix indentation of the debug print in the block in (5).
>> (6b,6c,6d) Fix printf types for ProcessorNum, use FMT_APIC_ID for
>> APIC_ID and 0x%Lx for QemuSelector[].
>> () As discussed elsewhere add an DEBUG_INFO print logging the
>> correspondence between ProcessorNum, APIC_ID, QemuSelector.
>> (7a,7b) Use EFI_ALREADY_STARTED instead of EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER and
>> document it in the UnplugCpus() comment block.
>> () As discussed elsewhere, add the import statement for
>> PcdCpuHotEjectDataAddress.
>> (9) Use Laszlo's comment in the PcdGet64(PcdCpuHotEjectDataAddress)
>> description block.
>> (10) Change mCpuHotEjectData init state checks from ASSERT to ones
>> consistent with similar checks for mCpuHotPlugData.
>> (11-14) Get rid of mCpuHotEjectData init loop: moved to a prior
>> patch so it can be done at allocation time.
>> (15) s/SmmCpuFeaturesSmiRendezvousExit/SmmCpuFeaturesRendezvousExit/
>> (16,17) Document the ordering requirements of
>> mCpuHotEjectData->Handler, and mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap.
>>
>> Not addressed:
>> (8) Not removing the EjectCount variable as I'd like to minimize
>> stores/loads to CPU_HOT_EJECT_DATA->Handler and so would like to do this
>> a single time at the end of the iteration. (It is safe to write multiple
>> times to the handler in UnplugCpus() but given the ordering concerns
>> around it, it seems cleaner to not access it unnecessarily.)
>>
>> OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplugSmm.inf | 2 +
>> OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplug.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplugSmm.inf b/OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplugSmm.inf
>> index 04322b0d7855..ebcc7e2ac63a 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplugSmm.inf
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplugSmm.inf
>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ [Packages]
>> [LibraryClasses]
>> BaseLib
>> BaseMemoryLib
>> + CpuLib
>> DebugLib
>> LocalApicLib
>> MmServicesTableLib
>> @@ -54,6 +55,7 @@ [Protocols]
>>
>> [Pcd]
>> gUefiCpuPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCpuHotPlugDataAddress ## CONSUMES
>> + gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCpuHotEjectDataAddress ## CONSUMES
>> gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdQ35SmramAtDefaultSmbase ## CONSUMES
>>
>> [FeaturePcd]
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplug.c b/OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplug.c
>> index f07b5072749a..851e2b28aad9 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplug.c
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplug.c
>> @@ -10,10 +10,12 @@
>> #include <IndustryStandard/Q35MchIch9.h> // ICH9_APM_CNT
>> #include <IndustryStandard/QemuCpuHotplug.h> // QEMU_CPUHP_CMD_GET_PENDING
>> #include <Library/BaseLib.h> // CpuDeadLoop()
>> +#include <Library/CpuLib.h> // CpuSleep()
>> #include <Library/DebugLib.h> // ASSERT()
>> #include <Library/MmServicesTableLib.h> // gMmst
>> #include <Library/PcdLib.h> // PcdGetBool()
>> #include <Library/SafeIntLib.h> // SafeUintnSub()
>> +#include <Pcd/CpuHotEjectData.h> // CPU_HOT_EJECT_DATA
>> #include <Protocol/MmCpuIo.h> // EFI_MM_CPU_IO_PROTOCOL
>> #include <Protocol/SmmCpuService.h> // EFI_SMM_CPU_SERVICE_PROTOCOL
>> #include <Uefi/UefiBaseType.h> // EFI_STATUS
>> @@ -32,11 +34,12 @@ STATIC EFI_MM_CPU_IO_PROTOCOL *mMmCpuIo;
>> //
>> STATIC EFI_SMM_CPU_SERVICE_PROTOCOL *mMmCpuService;
>> //
>> -// This structure is a communication side-channel between the
>> +// These structures serve as communication side-channels between the
>> // EFI_SMM_CPU_SERVICE_PROTOCOL consumer (i.e., this driver) and provider
>> // (i.e., PiSmmCpuDxeSmm).
>> //
>> STATIC CPU_HOT_PLUG_DATA *mCpuHotPlugData;
>> +STATIC CPU_HOT_EJECT_DATA *mCpuHotEjectData;
>> //
>> // SMRAM arrays for fetching the APIC IDs of processors with pending events (of
>> // known event types), for the time of just one MMI.
>> @@ -188,18 +191,72 @@ RevokeNewSlot:
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> + CPU Hot-eject handler, called from SmmCpuFeaturesRendezvousExit()
>> + on each CPU at exit from SMM.
>> +
>> + If, the executing CPU is not being ejected, nothing to be done.
>> + If, the executing CPU is being ejected, wait in a halted loop
>> + until ejected.
>> +
>> + @param[in] ProcessorNum ProcessorNum denotes the CPU exiting SMM,
>> + and will be used as an index into
>> + CPU_HOT_EJECT_DATA->QemuSelectorMap. It is
>> + identical to the processor handle number in
>> + EFI_SMM_CPU_SERVICE_PROTOCOL.
>> +**/
>> +VOID
>> +EFIAPI
>> +EjectCpu (
>> + IN UINTN ProcessorNum
>> + )
>> +{
>> + UINT64 QemuSelector;
>> +
>> + QemuSelector = mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum];
>> + if (QemuSelector == CPU_EJECT_QEMU_SELECTOR_INVALID) {
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + //
>> + // CPU(s) being unplugged get here from SmmCpuFeaturesRendezvousExit()
>> + // after having been cleared to exit the SMI by the BSP and thus have
>> + // no SMM processing remaining.
>> + //
>> + // Given that we cannot allow them to escape to the guest, we pen them
>> + // here until the BSP tells QEMU to unplug them.
>> + //
>> + for (;;) {
>> + DisableInterrupts ();
>> + CpuSleep ();
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> Process to be hot-unplugged CPUs, per QemuCpuhpCollectApicIds().
>>
>> For each such CPU, report the CPU to PiSmmCpuDxeSmm via
>> - EFI_SMM_CPU_SERVICE_PROTOCOL. If the to be hot-unplugged CPU is
>> - unknown, skip it silently.
>> + EFI_SMM_CPU_SERVICE_PROTOCOL and stash the APIC ID for later ejection.
>> + If the to be hot-unplugged CPU is unknown, skip it silently.
>> +
>> + Additonally, if we do stash any APIC IDs, also install a CPU eject handler
>> + which would handle the ejection.
>
> (1) Please update the two APIC ID references above to QEMU CPU selectors
> (the commit message has been updated already, correctly).
>
>
>>
>> @param[in] ToUnplugApicIds The APIC IDs of the CPUs that are about to be
>> hot-unplugged.
>>
>> + @param[in] ToUnplugSelector The QEMU Selectors of the CPUs that are about to
>> + be hot-unplugged.
>> +
>
> (2) Please rename the parameter to "ToUnplugSelectors" (plural), both
> here in the comment and in the actual parameter list.
>
>
>> @param[in] ToUnplugCount The number of filled-in APIC IDs in
>> ToUnplugApicIds.
>>
>> + @retval EFI_ALREADY_STARTED For the ProcessorNum that
>> + EFI_SMM_CPU_SERVICE_PROTOCOL had assigned to
>> + one of the APIC ID in ToUnplugApicIds,
>> + mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap already has
>> + the QemuSelector value stashed. (This should
>> + never happen.)
>> +
>
> (3) Unfortunately I made a typing error in my v6 review where I
> suggested this language: it should say
>
> one of the APIC ID*s* in ToUnplugApicIds
>
> (emphasis only here, in this comment)
>
>
>> @retval EFI_SUCCESS Known APIC IDs have been removed from SMM data
>> structures.
>>
>> @@ -210,23 +267,36 @@ STATIC
>> EFI_STATUS
>> UnplugCpus (
>> IN APIC_ID *ToUnplugApicIds,
>> + IN UINT32 *ToUnplugSelector,
>> IN UINT32 ToUnplugCount
>> )
>> {
>> EFI_STATUS Status;
>> UINT32 ToUnplugIdx;
>> + UINT32 EjectCount;
>> UINTN ProcessorNum;
>>
>> ToUnplugIdx = 0;
>> + EjectCount = 0;
>> while (ToUnplugIdx < ToUnplugCount) {
>> APIC_ID RemoveApicId;
>> + UINT32 QemuSelector;
>>
>> RemoveApicId = ToUnplugApicIds[ToUnplugIdx];
>> + QemuSelector = ToUnplugSelector[ToUnplugIdx];
>>
>> //
>> - // mCpuHotPlugData->ApicId maps ProcessorNum -> ApicId. Use it to find
>> - // the ProcessorNum for the APIC ID to be removed.
>> + // mCpuHotPlugData->ApicId maps ProcessorNum -> ApicId. Use RemoveApicId
>> + // to find the corresponding ProcessorNum for the CPU to be removed.
>> //
>> + // With this we can establish a 3 way mapping:
>> + // APIC_ID -- ProcessorNum -- QemuSelector
>> + //
>> + // We stash the ProcessorNum -> QemuSelector mapping so it can later be
>> + // used for CPU hot-eject in SmmCpuFeaturesRendezvousExit() context (where
>> + // we only have ProcessorNum available.)
>> + //
>> +
>> for (ProcessorNum = 0;
>> ProcessorNum < mCpuHotPlugData->ArrayLength;
>> ProcessorNum++) {
>> @@ -255,11 +325,64 @@ UnplugCpus (
>> return Status;
>> }
>>
>> + if (mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum] !=
>> + CPU_EJECT_QEMU_SELECTOR_INVALID) {
>
> (4) Invalid indentation; in this (controlling expression) context,
> CPU_EJECT_QEMU_SELECTOR_INVALID should line up with "mCpuHotEjectData".
>
>
>> + //
>> + // mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum] is set to
>> + // CPU_EJECT_QEMU_SELECTOR_INVALID when mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap
>> + // is allocated, and once the subject processsor is ejected.
>> + //
>> + // Additionally, mMmCpuService->RemoveProcessor(ProcessorNum) invalidates
>> + // mCpuHotPlugData->ApicId[ProcessorNum], so a given ProcessorNum can
>> + // never match more than one APIC ID and by transitivity, more than one
>> + // QemuSelector in a single invocation of UnplugCpus().
>> + //
>
> (5) good comment, but please make it a tiny bit easier to read: please
> insert two "em dashes", as follows:
>
> // never match more than one APIC ID -- and by transitivity, designate
> // more than one QemuSelector -- in a single invocation of UnplugCpus().
>
> (I've also inserted the verb "designate", because "match" doesn't seem
> to apply in that context.)
>
>
>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: ProcessorNum %Lu maps to QemuSelector 0x%Lx, "
>> + "cannot also map to 0x%Lx\n", __FUNCTION__, (UINT64)ProcessorNum,
>> + (UINT64)mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum], QemuSelector));
>
> (6a) "mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum]" has type UINT64,
> so the cast is superfluous
>
> (6b) we log selectors in all other places in decimal, so please use %Lu
> here, not 0x%Lx, for logging
> "mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum]"
>
> (6c) "QemuSelector" has type UINT32 (correctly), so we need to log it
> with either "0x%x" or "%u". Given my above point about logging selectors
> in decimal everywhere else, please use "%u".
>
> DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: ProcessorNum %Lu maps to QemuSelector %Lu, "
> "cannot also map to %u\n", __FUNCTION__, (UINT64)ProcessorNum,
> mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum], QemuSelector));
>
>
>> +
>> + Status = EFI_ALREADY_STARTED;
>> + return Status;
>> + }
>
> (7) style nit -- this looks better as "return EFI_ALREADY_STARTED".
>
>
>> +
>> + //
>> + // Stash the QemuSelector so we can do the actual ejection later.
>> + //
>> + mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum] = (UINT64)QemuSelector;
>> +
>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: Started hot-unplug on ProcessorNum %Lu, APIC ID "
>> + FMT_APIC_ID ", QemuSelector 0x%Lx\n", __FUNCTION__, (UINT64)ProcessorNum,
>> + RemoveApicId, mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum]));
>
> (8a) In the format string, please replace "QemuSelector 0x%Lx" with
> "QemuSelector %u" -- the main point is the decimal notation
>
> (8b) As a suggestion, I think we should simplify this DEBUG call by
> replacing the "mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum]" argument
> with just "QemuSelector".
>
> DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: Started hot-unplug on ProcessorNum %Lu, APIC ID "
> FMT_APIC_ID ", QemuSelector %u\n", __FUNCTION__, (UINT64)ProcessorNum,
> RemoveApicId, QemuSelector));
>
>
>> +
>> + EjectCount++;
>
> (I'm fine with keeping the "EjectCount" variable.)
>
>
>> ToUnplugIdx++;
>> }
>>
>> + if (EjectCount != 0) {
>> + //
>> + // We have processors to be ejected; install the handler.
>> + //
>> + mCpuHotEjectData->Handler = EjectCpu;
>> +
>> + //
>> + // The BSP, CPUs to be ejected dereference mCpuHotEjectData->Handler, and
>> + // mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[] in SmmCpuFeaturesRendezvousExit().
>> + //
>> + // Assignments to both of these are ordered-before the BSP's SMI exit signal
>> + // which happens via a write to SMM_DISPATCHER_MP_SYNC_DATA->AllCpusInSync.
>> + // Dereferences of both are ordered-after the synchronization via
>> + // "AllCpusInSync".
>> + //
>> + // So we are guaranteed that the Handler would see the assignments above.
>> + // However, add a MemoryFence() here in-lieu of a compiler barrier to
>> + // ensure that the compiler doesn't monkey around with the stores.
>> + //
>> + MemoryFence ();
>> + }
>> +
>
> (9) Per previous discussion (under patch v8 #7), please replace the last
> paragraph of this comment, with a "ReleaseMemoryFence" reference.
Will do. And acking the comments above.
Ankur
>
> The rest looks good.>
> Thanks!
> Laszlo
>
>> //
>> - // We've removed this set of APIC IDs from SMM data structures.
>> + // We've removed this set of APIC IDs from SMM data structures and
>> + // have installed an ejection handler if needed.
>> //
>> return EFI_SUCCESS;
>> }
>> @@ -387,7 +510,7 @@ CpuHotplugMmi (
>> }
>>
>> if (ToUnplugCount > 0) {
>> - Status = UnplugCpus (mToUnplugApicIds, ToUnplugCount);
>> + Status = UnplugCpus (mToUnplugApicIds, mToUnplugSelector, ToUnplugCount);
>> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>> goto Fatal;
>> }
>> @@ -458,9 +581,14 @@ CpuHotplugEntry (
>>
>> //
>> // Our DEPEX on EFI_SMM_CPU_SERVICE_PROTOCOL guarantees that PiSmmCpuDxeSmm
>> - // has pointed PcdCpuHotPlugDataAddress to CPU_HOT_PLUG_DATA in SMRAM.
>> + // has pointed:
>> + // - PcdCpuHotPlugDataAddress to CPU_HOT_PLUG_DATA in SMRAM,
>> + // - PcdCpuHotEjectDataAddress to CPU_HOT_EJECT_DATA in SMRAM, if the
>> + // possible CPU count is greater than 1.
>> //
>> mCpuHotPlugData = (VOID *)(UINTN)PcdGet64 (PcdCpuHotPlugDataAddress);
>> + mCpuHotEjectData = (VOID *)(UINTN)PcdGet64 (PcdCpuHotEjectDataAddress);
>> +
>> if (mCpuHotPlugData == NULL) {
>> Status = EFI_NOT_FOUND;
>> DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: CPU_HOT_PLUG_DATA: %r\n", __FUNCTION__, Status));
>> @@ -472,6 +600,19 @@ CpuHotplugEntry (
>> if (mCpuHotPlugData->ArrayLength == 1) {
>> return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
>> }
>> +
>> + if (mCpuHotEjectData == NULL) {
>> + Status = EFI_NOT_FOUND;
>> + } else if (mCpuHotPlugData->ArrayLength != mCpuHotEjectData->ArrayLength) {
>> + Status = EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
>> + } else {
>> + Status = EFI_SUCCESS;
>> + }
>> + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: CPU_HOT_EJECT_DATA: %r\n", __FUNCTION__, Status));
>> + goto Fatal;
>> + }
>> +
>> //
>> // Allocate the data structures that depend on the possible CPU count.
>> //
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-23 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-22 7:19 [PATCH v8 00/10] support CPU hot-unplug Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: refactor hotplug logic Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 11:49 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: collect hot-unplug events Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 12:27 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 22:03 ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-23 16:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: add Qemu Cpu Status helper Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 12:31 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 22:22 ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: introduce UnplugCpus() Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 12:39 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 22:22 ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: define CPU_HOT_EJECT_DATA Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 13:06 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 22:33 ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] OvmfPkg/SmmCpuFeaturesLib: init CPU ejection state Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 14:19 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-23 7:37 ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] OvmfPkg/SmmCpuFeaturesLib: call CPU hot-eject handler Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 14:53 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-23 7:37 ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-23 16:52 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-23 7:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-23 17:06 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-23 17:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-23 20:46 ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: add EjectCpu() Ankur Arora
2021-02-23 20:36 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-23 20:51 ` Ankur Arora [this message]
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: do actual CPU hot-eject Ankur Arora
2021-02-23 21:39 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-24 3:44 ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-25 19:22 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 7:19 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] OvmfPkg/SmmControl2Dxe: negotiate CPU hot-unplug Ankur Arora
2021-02-23 21:52 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=df838cdc-d2a2-dd69-5ca6-c11a774f97af@oracle.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox