public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ankur Arora" <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>,
	Aaron Young <aaron.young@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v8 08/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: add EjectCpu()
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 12:51:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <df838cdc-d2a2-dd69-5ca6-c11a774f97af@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e37922f-afbe-2b41-4eb9-4b3c62d28aa9@redhat.com>

On 2021-02-23 12:36 p.m., Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> superficial comments only; the patch is nearly ready:
> 
> On 02/22/21 08:19, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> Add EjectCpu(), which handles the CPU ejection, and provides a holding
>> area for said CPUs. It is called via SmmCpuFeaturesRendezvousExit(),
>> at the tail end of the SMI handling.
>>
>> Also UnplugCpus() now stashes QEMU Selectors of CPUs which need to be
>> ejected in CPU_HOT_EJECT_DATA.QemuSelectorMap. This is used by
>> EjectCpu() to identify CPUs marked for ejection.
>>
>> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
>> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
>> Cc: Aaron Young <aaron.young@oracle.com>
>> Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3132
>> Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>>      Address these review comments from v6:
>>       (1) s/CpuEject/EjectCpu/g
>>       (2) Ensure that the added include is in sorted order.
>>       (3) Switch to a cheaper CpuSleep() based loop instead of
>>        CpuDeadLoop().  Also add the CpuLib LibraryClass.
>>       (4) Remove the nested else clause
>>       (5) Use Laszlo's much clearer comment when we try to map multiple
>>        QemuSelector to the same ProcessorNum.
>>       (6a) Fix indentation of the debug print in the block in (5).
>>       (6b,6c,6d) Fix printf types for ProcessorNum, use FMT_APIC_ID for
>>        APIC_ID and 0x%Lx for QemuSelector[].
>>       () As discussed elsewhere add an DEBUG_INFO print logging the
>>        correspondence between ProcessorNum, APIC_ID, QemuSelector.
>>       (7a,7b) Use EFI_ALREADY_STARTED instead of EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER and
>>        document it in the UnplugCpus() comment block.
>>       ()  As discussed elsewhere, add the import statement for
>>        PcdCpuHotEjectDataAddress.
>>       (9) Use Laszlo's comment in the PcdGet64(PcdCpuHotEjectDataAddress)
>>        description block.
>>       (10) Change mCpuHotEjectData init state checks from ASSERT to ones
>>        consistent with similar checks for mCpuHotPlugData.
>>       (11-14) Get rid of mCpuHotEjectData init loop: moved to a prior
>>        patch so it can be done at allocation time.
>>       (15) s/SmmCpuFeaturesSmiRendezvousExit/SmmCpuFeaturesRendezvousExit/
>>       (16,17) Document the ordering requirements of
>>        mCpuHotEjectData->Handler, and mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap.
>>
>>      Not addressed:
>>       (8) Not removing the EjectCount variable as I'd like to minimize
>>        stores/loads to CPU_HOT_EJECT_DATA->Handler and so would like to do this
>>        a single time at the end of the iteration.  (It is safe to write multiple
>>        times to the handler in UnplugCpus() but given the ordering concerns
>>        around it, it seems cleaner to not access it unnecessarily.)
>>
>>   OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplugSmm.inf |   2 +
>>   OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplug.c      | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   2 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplugSmm.inf b/OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplugSmm.inf
>> index 04322b0d7855..ebcc7e2ac63a 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplugSmm.inf
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplugSmm.inf
>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ [Packages]
>>   [LibraryClasses]
>>     BaseLib
>>     BaseMemoryLib
>> +  CpuLib
>>     DebugLib
>>     LocalApicLib
>>     MmServicesTableLib
>> @@ -54,6 +55,7 @@ [Protocols]
>>
>>   [Pcd]
>>     gUefiCpuPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCpuHotPlugDataAddress                ## CONSUMES
>> +  gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCpuHotEjectDataAddress              ## CONSUMES
>>     gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdQ35SmramAtDefaultSmbase             ## CONSUMES
>>
>>   [FeaturePcd]
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplug.c b/OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplug.c
>> index f07b5072749a..851e2b28aad9 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplug.c
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm/CpuHotplug.c
>> @@ -10,10 +10,12 @@
>>   #include <IndustryStandard/Q35MchIch9.h>     // ICH9_APM_CNT
>>   #include <IndustryStandard/QemuCpuHotplug.h> // QEMU_CPUHP_CMD_GET_PENDING
>>   #include <Library/BaseLib.h>                 // CpuDeadLoop()
>> +#include <Library/CpuLib.h>                  // CpuSleep()
>>   #include <Library/DebugLib.h>                // ASSERT()
>>   #include <Library/MmServicesTableLib.h>      // gMmst
>>   #include <Library/PcdLib.h>                  // PcdGetBool()
>>   #include <Library/SafeIntLib.h>              // SafeUintnSub()
>> +#include <Pcd/CpuHotEjectData.h>             // CPU_HOT_EJECT_DATA
>>   #include <Protocol/MmCpuIo.h>                // EFI_MM_CPU_IO_PROTOCOL
>>   #include <Protocol/SmmCpuService.h>          // EFI_SMM_CPU_SERVICE_PROTOCOL
>>   #include <Uefi/UefiBaseType.h>               // EFI_STATUS
>> @@ -32,11 +34,12 @@ STATIC EFI_MM_CPU_IO_PROTOCOL *mMmCpuIo;
>>   //
>>   STATIC EFI_SMM_CPU_SERVICE_PROTOCOL *mMmCpuService;
>>   //
>> -// This structure is a communication side-channel between the
>> +// These structures serve as communication side-channels between the
>>   // EFI_SMM_CPU_SERVICE_PROTOCOL consumer (i.e., this driver) and provider
>>   // (i.e., PiSmmCpuDxeSmm).
>>   //
>>   STATIC CPU_HOT_PLUG_DATA *mCpuHotPlugData;
>> +STATIC CPU_HOT_EJECT_DATA *mCpuHotEjectData;
>>   //
>>   // SMRAM arrays for fetching the APIC IDs of processors with pending events (of
>>   // known event types), for the time of just one MMI.
>> @@ -188,18 +191,72 @@ RevokeNewSlot:
>>   }
>>
>>   /**
>> +  CPU Hot-eject handler, called from SmmCpuFeaturesRendezvousExit()
>> +  on each CPU at exit from SMM.
>> +
>> +  If, the executing CPU is not being ejected, nothing to be done.
>> +  If, the executing CPU is being ejected, wait in a halted loop
>> +  until ejected.
>> +
>> +  @param[in] ProcessorNum      ProcessorNum denotes the CPU exiting SMM,
>> +                               and will be used as an index into
>> +                               CPU_HOT_EJECT_DATA->QemuSelectorMap. It is
>> +                               identical to the processor handle number in
>> +                               EFI_SMM_CPU_SERVICE_PROTOCOL.
>> +**/
>> +VOID
>> +EFIAPI
>> +EjectCpu (
>> +  IN UINTN ProcessorNum
>> +  )
>> +{
>> +  UINT64 QemuSelector;
>> +
>> +  QemuSelector = mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum];
>> +  if (QemuSelector == CPU_EJECT_QEMU_SELECTOR_INVALID) {
>> +    return;
>> +  }
>> +
>> +  //
>> +  // CPU(s) being unplugged get here from SmmCpuFeaturesRendezvousExit()
>> +  // after having been cleared to exit the SMI by the BSP and thus have
>> +  // no SMM processing remaining.
>> +  //
>> +  // Given that we cannot allow them to escape to the guest, we pen them
>> +  // here until the BSP tells QEMU to unplug them.
>> +  //
>> +  for (;;) {
>> +    DisableInterrupts ();
>> +    CpuSleep ();
>> +  }
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>>     Process to be hot-unplugged CPUs, per QemuCpuhpCollectApicIds().
>>
>>     For each such CPU, report the CPU to PiSmmCpuDxeSmm via
>> -  EFI_SMM_CPU_SERVICE_PROTOCOL. If the to be hot-unplugged CPU is
>> -  unknown, skip it silently.
>> +  EFI_SMM_CPU_SERVICE_PROTOCOL and stash the APIC ID for later ejection.
>> +  If the to be hot-unplugged CPU is unknown, skip it silently.
>> +
>> +  Additonally, if we do stash any APIC IDs, also install a CPU eject handler
>> +  which would handle the ejection.
> 
> (1) Please update the two APIC ID references above to QEMU CPU selectors
> (the commit message has been updated already, correctly).
> 
> 
>>
>>     @param[in] ToUnplugApicIds    The APIC IDs of the CPUs that are about to be
>>                                   hot-unplugged.
>>
>> +  @param[in] ToUnplugSelector   The QEMU Selectors of the CPUs that are about to
>> +                                be hot-unplugged.
>> +
> 
> (2) Please rename the parameter to "ToUnplugSelectors" (plural), both
> here in the comment and in the actual parameter list.
> 
> 
>>     @param[in] ToUnplugCount      The number of filled-in APIC IDs in
>>                                   ToUnplugApicIds.
>>
>> +  @retval EFI_ALREADY_STARTED   For the ProcessorNum that
>> +                                EFI_SMM_CPU_SERVICE_PROTOCOL had assigned to
>> +                                one of the APIC ID in ToUnplugApicIds,
>> +                                mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap already has
>> +                                the QemuSelector value stashed. (This should
>> +                                never happen.)
>> +
> 
> (3) Unfortunately I made a typing error in my v6 review where I
> suggested this language: it should say
> 
>    one of the APIC ID*s* in ToUnplugApicIds
> 
> (emphasis only here, in this comment)
> 
> 
>>     @retval EFI_SUCCESS           Known APIC IDs have been removed from SMM data
>>                                   structures.
>>
>> @@ -210,23 +267,36 @@ STATIC
>>   EFI_STATUS
>>   UnplugCpus (
>>     IN APIC_ID                      *ToUnplugApicIds,
>> +  IN UINT32                       *ToUnplugSelector,
>>     IN UINT32                       ToUnplugCount
>>     )
>>   {
>>     EFI_STATUS Status;
>>     UINT32     ToUnplugIdx;
>> +  UINT32     EjectCount;
>>     UINTN      ProcessorNum;
>>
>>     ToUnplugIdx = 0;
>> +  EjectCount = 0;
>>     while (ToUnplugIdx < ToUnplugCount) {
>>       APIC_ID    RemoveApicId;
>> +    UINT32     QemuSelector;
>>
>>       RemoveApicId = ToUnplugApicIds[ToUnplugIdx];
>> +    QemuSelector = ToUnplugSelector[ToUnplugIdx];
>>
>>       //
>> -    // mCpuHotPlugData->ApicId maps ProcessorNum -> ApicId. Use it to find
>> -    // the ProcessorNum for the APIC ID to be removed.
>> +    // mCpuHotPlugData->ApicId maps ProcessorNum -> ApicId. Use RemoveApicId
>> +    // to find the corresponding ProcessorNum for the CPU to be removed.
>>       //
>> +    // With this we can establish a 3 way mapping:
>> +    //    APIC_ID -- ProcessorNum -- QemuSelector
>> +    //
>> +    // We stash the ProcessorNum -> QemuSelector mapping so it can later be
>> +    // used for CPU hot-eject in SmmCpuFeaturesRendezvousExit() context (where
>> +    // we only have ProcessorNum available.)
>> +    //
>> +
>>       for (ProcessorNum = 0;
>>            ProcessorNum < mCpuHotPlugData->ArrayLength;
>>            ProcessorNum++) {
>> @@ -255,11 +325,64 @@ UnplugCpus (
>>         return Status;
>>       }
>>
>> +    if (mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum] !=
>> +          CPU_EJECT_QEMU_SELECTOR_INVALID) {
> 
> (4) Invalid indentation; in this (controlling expression) context,
> CPU_EJECT_QEMU_SELECTOR_INVALID should line up with "mCpuHotEjectData".
> 
> 
>> +      //
>> +      // mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum] is set to
>> +      // CPU_EJECT_QEMU_SELECTOR_INVALID when mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap
>> +      // is allocated, and once the subject processsor is ejected.
>> +      //
>> +      // Additionally, mMmCpuService->RemoveProcessor(ProcessorNum) invalidates
>> +      // mCpuHotPlugData->ApicId[ProcessorNum], so a given ProcessorNum can
>> +      // never match more than one APIC ID and by transitivity, more than one
>> +      // QemuSelector in a single invocation of UnplugCpus().
>> +      //
> 
> (5) good comment, but please make it a tiny bit easier to read: please
> insert two "em dashes", as follows:
> 
>        // never match more than one APIC ID -- and by transitivity, designate
>        // more than one QemuSelector -- in a single invocation of UnplugCpus().
> 
> (I've also inserted the verb "designate", because "match" doesn't seem
> to apply in that context.)
> 
> 
>> +      DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: ProcessorNum %Lu maps to QemuSelector 0x%Lx, "
>> +        "cannot also map to 0x%Lx\n", __FUNCTION__, (UINT64)ProcessorNum,
>> +        (UINT64)mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum], QemuSelector));
> 
> (6a) "mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum]" has type UINT64,
> so the cast is superfluous
> 
> (6b) we log selectors in all other places in decimal, so please use %Lu
> here, not 0x%Lx, for logging
> "mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum]"
> 
> (6c) "QemuSelector" has type UINT32 (correctly), so we need to log it
> with either "0x%x" or "%u". Given my above point about logging selectors
> in decimal everywhere else, please use "%u".
> 
>        DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: ProcessorNum %Lu maps to QemuSelector %Lu, "
>          "cannot also map to %u\n", __FUNCTION__, (UINT64)ProcessorNum,
>          mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum], QemuSelector));
> 
> 
>> +
>> +      Status = EFI_ALREADY_STARTED;
>> +      return Status;
>> +    }
> 
> (7) style nit -- this looks better as "return EFI_ALREADY_STARTED".
> 
> 
>> +
>> +    //
>> +    // Stash the QemuSelector so we can do the actual ejection later.
>> +    //
>> +    mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum] = (UINT64)QemuSelector;
>> +
>> +    DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: Started hot-unplug on ProcessorNum %Lu, APIC ID "
>> +      FMT_APIC_ID ", QemuSelector 0x%Lx\n", __FUNCTION__, (UINT64)ProcessorNum,
>> +      RemoveApicId, mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum]));
> 
> (8a) In the format string, please replace "QemuSelector 0x%Lx" with
> "QemuSelector %u" -- the main point is the decimal notation
> 
> (8b) As a suggestion, I think we should simplify this DEBUG call by
> replacing the "mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[ProcessorNum]" argument
> with just "QemuSelector".
> 
>      DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: Started hot-unplug on ProcessorNum %Lu, APIC ID "
>        FMT_APIC_ID ", QemuSelector %u\n", __FUNCTION__, (UINT64)ProcessorNum,
>        RemoveApicId, QemuSelector));
> 
> 
>> +
>> +    EjectCount++;
> 
> (I'm fine with keeping the "EjectCount" variable.)
> 
> 
>>       ToUnplugIdx++;
>>     }
>>
>> +  if (EjectCount != 0) {
>> +    //
>> +    // We have processors to be ejected; install the handler.
>> +    //
>> +    mCpuHotEjectData->Handler = EjectCpu;
>> +
>> +    //
>> +    // The BSP, CPUs to be ejected dereference mCpuHotEjectData->Handler, and
>> +    // mCpuHotEjectData->QemuSelectorMap[] in SmmCpuFeaturesRendezvousExit().
>> +    //
>> +    // Assignments to both of these are ordered-before the BSP's SMI exit signal
>> +    // which happens via a write to SMM_DISPATCHER_MP_SYNC_DATA->AllCpusInSync.
>> +    // Dereferences of both are ordered-after the synchronization via
>> +    // "AllCpusInSync".
>> +    //
>> +    // So we are guaranteed that the Handler would see the assignments above.
>> +    // However, add a MemoryFence() here in-lieu of a compiler barrier to
>> +    // ensure that the compiler doesn't monkey around with the stores.
>> +    //
>> +    MemoryFence ();
>> +  }
>> +
> 
> (9) Per previous discussion (under patch v8 #7), please replace the last
> paragraph of this comment, with a "ReleaseMemoryFence" reference.

Will do. And acking the comments above.

Ankur

> 
> The rest looks good.> 
> Thanks!
> Laszlo
> 
>>     //
>> -  // We've removed this set of APIC IDs from SMM data structures.
>> +  // We've removed this set of APIC IDs from SMM data structures and
>> +  // have installed an ejection handler if needed.
>>     //
>>     return EFI_SUCCESS;
>>   }
>> @@ -387,7 +510,7 @@ CpuHotplugMmi (
>>     }
>>
>>     if (ToUnplugCount > 0) {
>> -    Status = UnplugCpus (mToUnplugApicIds, ToUnplugCount);
>> +    Status = UnplugCpus (mToUnplugApicIds, mToUnplugSelector, ToUnplugCount);
>>       if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>>         goto Fatal;
>>       }
>> @@ -458,9 +581,14 @@ CpuHotplugEntry (
>>
>>     //
>>     // Our DEPEX on EFI_SMM_CPU_SERVICE_PROTOCOL guarantees that PiSmmCpuDxeSmm
>> -  // has pointed PcdCpuHotPlugDataAddress to CPU_HOT_PLUG_DATA in SMRAM.
>> +  // has pointed:
>> +  // - PcdCpuHotPlugDataAddress to CPU_HOT_PLUG_DATA in SMRAM,
>> +  // - PcdCpuHotEjectDataAddress to CPU_HOT_EJECT_DATA in SMRAM, if the
>> +  //   possible CPU count is greater than 1.
>>     //
>>     mCpuHotPlugData = (VOID *)(UINTN)PcdGet64 (PcdCpuHotPlugDataAddress);
>> +  mCpuHotEjectData = (VOID *)(UINTN)PcdGet64 (PcdCpuHotEjectDataAddress);
>> +
>>     if (mCpuHotPlugData == NULL) {
>>       Status = EFI_NOT_FOUND;
>>       DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: CPU_HOT_PLUG_DATA: %r\n", __FUNCTION__, Status));
>> @@ -472,6 +600,19 @@ CpuHotplugEntry (
>>     if (mCpuHotPlugData->ArrayLength == 1) {
>>       return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
>>     }
>> +
>> +  if (mCpuHotEjectData == NULL) {
>> +    Status = EFI_NOT_FOUND;
>> +  } else if (mCpuHotPlugData->ArrayLength != mCpuHotEjectData->ArrayLength) {
>> +    Status = EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
>> +  } else {
>> +    Status = EFI_SUCCESS;
>> +  }
>> +  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>> +    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: CPU_HOT_EJECT_DATA: %r\n", __FUNCTION__, Status));
>> +    goto Fatal;
>> +  }
>> +
>>     //
>>     // Allocate the data structures that depend on the possible CPU count.
>>     //
>>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-23 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-22  7:19 [PATCH v8 00/10] support CPU hot-unplug Ankur Arora
2021-02-22  7:19 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: refactor hotplug logic Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 11:49   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22  7:19 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: collect hot-unplug events Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 12:27   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 22:03     ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-23 16:44       ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22  7:19 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: add Qemu Cpu Status helper Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 12:31   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 22:22     ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-22  7:19 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: introduce UnplugCpus() Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 12:39   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 22:22     ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-22  7:19 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: define CPU_HOT_EJECT_DATA Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 13:06   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22 22:33     ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-22  7:19 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] OvmfPkg/SmmCpuFeaturesLib: init CPU ejection state Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 14:19   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-23  7:37     ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-22  7:19 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] OvmfPkg/SmmCpuFeaturesLib: call CPU hot-eject handler Ankur Arora
2021-02-22 14:53   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-23  7:37     ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-23 16:52       ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-23  7:45     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-23 17:06       ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-23 17:18         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-23 20:46           ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-22  7:19 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: add EjectCpu() Ankur Arora
2021-02-23 20:36   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-23 20:51     ` Ankur Arora [this message]
2021-02-22  7:19 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: do actual CPU hot-eject Ankur Arora
2021-02-23 21:39   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-24  3:44     ` Ankur Arora
2021-02-25 19:22       ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-02-22  7:19 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] OvmfPkg/SmmControl2Dxe: negotiate CPU hot-unplug Ankur Arora
2021-02-23 21:52   ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=df838cdc-d2a2-dd69-5ca6-c11a774f97af@oracle.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox