From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.7841.1601540826701533432 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 01:27:06 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=gMf5Iz8Z; spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 63.128.21.124, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com) Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601540825; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Wp3R9SoM+HQqFxle6M8ZeTjkJjbItjvb5efst/oIV4U=; b=gMf5Iz8Ziwf2vp9Bwqmv7pG/r26fspcExddJsSqrRnqGQZ15aQUt2jae4wJsZbRf2diURF hFl4/+cWZo26waVMZSQR3APtkRQkUUQZrOVxfC9wzPL2D8j4+UnFBpb6hkhNyxE4vf2BLt vyDsyhh5eXG15/ymURkV7wEjunRo7is= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-192-RfUGHzx3P6aBLLfoIJ3kIA-1; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 04:26:57 -0400 X-MC-Unique: RfUGHzx3P6aBLLfoIJ3kIA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BF051868416; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 08:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-113-110.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.110]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E2F10013C4; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 08:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtFWFRFUk5BTF0gUkU6IFtlZGsyLWFubm91bmNlXSDlm57lpI06IFtlZGsyLWRldmVsXSBUaWFub2NvcmUgY29tbXVuaXR5IHBhZ2Ugb24gd2hvIHdlIGFyZSAtIHBsZWFzZSByZXZpZXc=?= To: "Yao, Jiewen" , Leif Lindholm Cc: gaoliming , "devel@edk2.groups.io" , "Guptha, Soumya K" , "announce@edk2.groups.io" , "Kinney, Michael D" , 'Andrew Fish' References: <16383D375E5994D7.27235@groups.io> <005f01d69476$81768bd0$8463a370$@byosoft.com.cn> <20200928120131.GA5623@vanye> From: "Laszlo Ersek" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 10:26:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=lersek@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 09/30/20 04:11, Yao, Jiewen wrote: > Hi Leif and Liming > I have double checked with Mike Kinney on the role and responsibility of reviewers. > Mike and I reach the consensus below (a short version, detail will be added to the wiki page later): > > 1) Maintainers are the ONLY ones who can approve a patch. > 2) Reviewers CANNOT approve the patch. (*) > 3) A maintainer CANNOT approve his/her own patch. > 4) Maintainers MAY delegate the approval work to reviewers. > > So the final state of the commit message as a minimum must be either: > Reviewed-by: > Or: > Acked-by: > Reviewed-by: This is the best resolution in my opinion. It allows maintainers to delegate the technical review to reviewers, but it requires maintainers to be at least aware of the patch and the review session. Thanks, Laszlo > > All in all, I don’t think it is correct to say "Reviewers can approve the patch. The only additional work from maintainers is to check in the patch". > > Please let us know if you have different thought. > > Thank you > Yao Jiewen > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Leif Lindholm >> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2020 8:02 PM >> To: Yao, Jiewen >> Cc: gaoliming ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Guptha, >> Soumya K ; announce@edk2.groups.io; >> lersek@redhat.com; Kinney, Michael D ; 'Andrew >> Fish' >> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: [edk2-announce] 回复: [edk2-devel] Tianocore >> community page on who we are - please review >> >> Hi Jiewen, >> >> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 03:25:24 +0000, Yao, Jiewen wrote: >>> Thanks Liming. >>> >>> It seems I have some misunderstanding here. >>> >>> According to current process, I feel that only maintainer has right to >> *approve* the patch. >>> The reviewer cannot approve the patch. >>> Do you mean the reviewer can also approve the patch? >> >> My view is that a reviewer has a right to "approve" a patch, but they >> do not have access to actually push the patch. A maintainer is needed >> for that. In instances where a designated maintainer is unavaliable to >> do so, another maintainer would be permitted to push the patch. >> >> In instances where the designated maintainer disagrees with the >> reviewer, the patch should not be pushed. However, the same should be >> true for a patch where two designated maintainers or two designated >> reviewers disagree. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Leif >> >>> According to https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/Who-we- >> are#role-of-a-reviewer, I don’t think "Reviewer takes role 1~4.". (I am confused >> here ... So please do correct me if I am wrong.) >>> ================= >>> Role of a Reviewer >>> Reviewers help maintainers review code, but don't have push access. >>> >>> A designated Package Reviewer: >>> >>> shall be reasonably familiar with the Package (or some modules thereof) >>> >>> will be copied on the patch discussions, >>> >>> and/or provides testing or regression testing for the Package (or some >> modules thereof), in certain platforms and environments. >>> ================ >>> >>> Thank you >>> Yao Jiewen >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: announce@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of >>>> gaoliming >>>> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2020 10:33 AM >>>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Yao, Jiewen ; Guptha, >>>> Soumya K ; announce@edk2.groups.io >>>> Cc: lersek@redhat.com; 'Leif Lindholm (Nuvia address)' ; >>>> Kinney, Michael D ; 'Andrew Fish' >>>> >>>> Subject: [edk2-announce] 回复: [edk2-devel] Tianocore community page on >>>> who we are - please review >>>> >>>> Jiewen: >>>> >>>> Now, we have reviewer and maintainer role. Reviewer takes role 1~4. >>>> Maintainer takes role 1~7. If the people know edk2 process well, they mostly >>>> know edk2 one or more packages (modules). So, they can take Maintainer >> role. >>>> If the people only focus on the technical review, they can take reviewer >>>> role. I would suggest there is at lease one Maintainer for each package. >>>> There are more reviewers for each package. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Soumya: >>>> >>>> Here are my comments. >>>> >>>> Guidelines for a Maintainer. Never let a pending request get older than a >>>> calendar week. This requirement is too strict to the maintainer or reviewer. >>>> The maintainer or reviewer should try to give the response in one week. But, >>>> they may not fully review one patch set in one week, es for the feature or >>>> the complex change. >>>> >>>> Role of a Contributor/developer. We need to highlight the role & >>>> responsibility for the incompatible change. If the contributor proposes the >>>> incompatible change, he needs to coordinate with the impacted platform >>>> maintainer and make the agreement who will follow up to update the >> impacted >>>> platforms before he requests to merge his patch set. The impacted platforms >>>> include all ones in Edk2 and Edk2Platforms. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Last, this page also needs to include release maintainer Definition and >>>> Role. The release maintainer is to create the quarterly stable tag. He takes >>>> the role to collect the feature planning for each stable tag, schedule the >>>> release date, and create the stable tag with the release notes on tag page. >>>> He will also send the announcement of soft feature freeze, hard feature >>>> freeze and the stable tag completement to edk2 community. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Liming >>>> >>>> 发件人: bounce+27952+65655+4905953+8761045@groups.io >>>> 代表 Yao, Jiewen >>>> 发送时间: 2020年9月26日 13:33 >>>> 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io; Yao, Jiewen ; >> Guptha, >>>> Soumya K ; announce@edk2.groups.io >>>> 主题: Re: [edk2-devel] Tianocore community page on who we are - please >>>> review >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Some other thought is about maintainer’s role definition: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The role of a maintainer is to: >>>> >>>> 1. Maintainer assignments to packages and source file name patterns are >>>> provided in the " >>>> >> Maintainers. >>>> txt" file. >>>> 2. Subscribe to the "edk2-bugs" mailing list >>>> https://edk2.groups.io/g/bugs, which >>>> propagates TianoCore Bugzilla >>>> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/ actions via email. Keep a close eye on new >>>> issues reported for their assigned packages. Participate in triaging and >>>> analyzing bugs filed for their assigned packages. >>>> 3. Responsible for reviewing patches and answering questions from >>>> contributors, on the edk2-devel mailing list >>>> https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/. >>>> 4. Responsible for coordinating patch review with co-maintainers and >>>> reviewers of the same package. >>>> 5. Has push / merge access to the merge branch. >>>> 6. Responsible for merging approved patches into the master branch. >>>> 7. Follow the EDK II development >>>> > Development-Pr >>>> ocess> process. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> IMHO, the 1~4 need technical expertise, while 5~7 need process expertise. >>>> >>>> Logically, the can be two separated roles and be done by two different >>>> persons. >>>> >>>> A people who has strong technical expertise might NOT be the best person >> to >>>> do the integration, and vice versa. I hope we can let right person do right >>>> thing in right way. >>>> >>>> For example, to avoid mistake during check in, 5~7 can be done by a role >>>> named “integrator”. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> My dream is that check-in process is just one click button. But it seems we >>>> are still far from it… >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> My two cents. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you >>>> >>>> Yao Jiewen >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: devel@edk2.groups.io >>>> > On Behalf Of Yao, >>>> Jiewen >>>> Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2020 1:09 PM >>>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io ; Guptha, >> Soumya K >>>> >; >>>> announce@edk2.groups.io >>>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Tianocore community page on who we are - please >>>> review >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks Soumya. I think this is a good start. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Recently we are discussing the maintainer’s work in EDKII mailing list, >>>> with title “more development process failure”. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I feel the process mentioned in >>>> https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II- >> Development-Pro >>>> cess is not clear enough to follow, especially for the maintainer who is not >>>> full time working on EDKII. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I wish we can have this opportunity to revisit the “Follow the EDK II >>>> development >>>> > Development-Pr >>>> ocess> process” and make “the process” simpler and clearer. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Then all maintainers can sign to follow one rule. The rule we define and the >>>> rule we agree with. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you >>>> >>>> Yao Jiewen >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: devel@edk2.groups.io >>>> > On Behalf Of >> Soumya >>>> Guptha >>>> Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2020 6:35 AM >>>> To: announce@edk2.groups.io ; >>>> devel@edk2.groups.io >>>> Subject: [edk2-devel] Tianocore community page on who we are - please >> review >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Dear Community members, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have drafted a document “who we are”, explaining Tianocore community >>>> structure, members of the community, their role and the current >> development >>>> process. I have drafted this document with the help of the Tianocore >>>> Stewards. >>>> >>>> We view this as a living document, as our development processes evolve, I >>>> will keep this document updated. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Please review the draft version of the document (link below) and provide >>>> your feedback. Please send it to me, no need to reply all. >>>> >>>> I appreciate your input by Friday, Oct 2. After this, I plan on make it live >>>> on our TianoCore wiki site. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Link: https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/Who-we-are >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Soumya >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Soumya Guptha >>>> TianoCore Community Manager >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>