From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.6663.1573034200936087071
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Wed, 06 Nov 2019 01:56:41 -0800
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Q3ASfdMA;
 spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 207.211.31.120, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1573034200;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=ggdBZa5VWBUohJac3aG9Nqj4uGeM+2eoxQzbrFX1UEQ=;
	b=Q3ASfdMAiZ806yULPd8sVxP3rouoaxnDYGtLY5/3eib38Hn5HTmn1Xhik9CdzbdU52QGLO
	X9zgPr+Up9PkY3OhokXYXMneQ2ebf2hVoxhOQggJlWe+AGCrJtt+7jce1YkrgEAog/GnjS
	kkDppHlUxlLM9A6pfi5ax8zfnwo9V8w=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-9-QpgSYsaLOjeFtg_gWum8Vg-1; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 04:56:38 -0500
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82D85107ACC3;
	Wed,  6 Nov 2019 09:56:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-116-193.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.193])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD84600CC;
	Wed,  6 Nov 2019 09:56:36 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
To: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com>, devel@edk2.groups.io
References: <72ce1d71-2a65-a6c0-1dd8-7628429c5a3c@redhat.com>
 <27337.1572995980617823578@groups.io>
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <e2432d98-714f-b44f-6cd6-b432c2d75f40@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:56:35 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <27337.1572995980617823578@groups.io>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11
X-MC-Unique: QpgSYsaLOjeFtg_gWum8Vg-1
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 11/06/19 00:19, Jeff Brasen wrote:
> Wouldn't having a variable that we create and delete on every boot put un=
necessary stress on the SPI-NOR that the variable store lives on?

Yes, it most likely would.

[...]

Thanks
Laszlo