From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web09.9259.1578158267870304393 for ; Sat, 04 Jan 2020 09:17:48 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=L0WB9pio; spf=pass (domain: riseup.net, ip: 198.252.153.129, mailfrom: phlamorim@riseup.net) Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47qpPR2Cm8zDqgt; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 09:17:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1578158267; bh=TT6lTIpidqhpTHgXwvKLXEsnw3w3PiBb8VcJt0oNZ4c=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=L0WB9pio1e36gcPS6w82WiUIFLYTTp71qBC//DrH17Hq+Wse4nQraFzabmtAVWogw TeZWME5y1ZTmVtE6aTFfWxt5dh3uPSgQNCznade8dvlMryMGwzCzKxBz83NkiUGy5D v0ab35zHt4J2BN4apVu23vipc5Vjlavm82pifYVo= X-Riseup-User-ID: E911A493E0637466C872BB8C0315076A61AEA083B0E6B2317DD3B90169174AFA Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47qpPQ3TwBzJrXx; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 09:17:46 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Interpretation of specification To: devel@edk2.groups.io, ekhoruzhenko@absolute.com References: <0daf62c6-f746-9e3c-bc01-e32b11161b6f@riseup.net> <9658.1578081176951253055@groups.io> From: "Paulo Henrique Lacerda de Amorim" Message-ID: Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 14:17:43 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9658.1578081176951253055@groups.io> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------AD4BA51826AF31094A52169D" Content-Language: en-US --------------AD4BA51826AF31094A52169D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I Appreciate you replicated my experiment, and for sure it will be helpful if you can figure out where the payload is wrong. Let me know if i should provide more info. Em 03/01/2020 16:52, Eugene Khoruzhenko escreveu: > Hi Paulo, I finally got to looking into this and I was able to > replicate your experiment. I created the payloads with your scripts > and tried to write the "file_name" one with my firmware code and I get > the error. So the problem may be not with the TestPkg.c but the way > payloads are generated. I'll try to dig deeper and compare with my > code that works OK, and figure it out if you want. > --------------AD4BA51826AF31094A52169D Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I Appreciate you replicated my experiment, and for sure it will be helpful if you can figure out where the payload is wrong.

Let me know if i should provide more info.

Em 03/01/2020 16:52, Eugene Khoruzhenko escreveu:
Hi Paulo, I finally got to looking into this and I was able to replicate your experiment. I created the payloads with your scripts and tried to write the "file_name" one with my firmware code and I get the error. So the problem may be not with the TestPkg.c but the way payloads are generated. I'll try to dig deeper and compare with my code that works OK, and figure it out if you want.
--------------AD4BA51826AF31094A52169D--